Daniel Greenfield, the definition of peace is explored, highlighting the distinction between peace and the mere absence of war. The article argues that true peace comes from confronting evil.
• Peace vs. War: Greenfield asserts that real peace is not just the absence of war. Instead, it requires the absence of evil, as evil perpetuates conflict.
• Historical Context: The article references ongoing conflicts, particularly with Iran, and critiques previous U. S. administrations for their approaches to peace, indicating that appeasement leads to continued aggression.
• Illusions of Peace: The writer emphasizes that calls for peace should address the existence of evil rather than ignore it. Weakness in facing evil is seen as a form of serving that evil.
• Examples of Communism and Historical Leaders: The text draws parallels between current Islamist threats and historical totalitarian regimes like communism and figures such as Hitler.
• Strength Against Evil: Greenfield concludes that peace comes through strength in confronting evil, suggesting that merely wishing for peace without action against evil is ineffective.
The article argues that without confronting evil, calls for peace do not lead to genuine safety or resolution; instead, they may encourage further violence. The need for strength and moral clarity in the face of such challenges is emphasized.
https://www.frontpagemag.com/peace-comes-from-an-absence-of-evil-not-an-absence-of-war/
No comments:
Post a Comment