US PRESS CORPS ONLINE

It's becoming increasingly difficult to discern fact from fiction, and unfortunately the media has a strong bias. They spin stories to make conservatives look bad and will go to great lengths to avoid reporting on the good that comes from conservative policies. There are a few shining lights in the media landscape-brave conservative outlets that report the truth and offer a different perspective. We must support conservative outlets like this one and ensure that our voices are heard.

Friday, May 15, 2026

Don’t Be Locked Down

The possibility of a new wave of lockdowns due to emerging health concerns, with a focus on heightened fears stemming from cases like Hantavirus on a cruise ship. The Brownstone Institute warns that powerful figures are eager to impose restrictions using any pretext available, urging public resistance against this trend.

• Fear of New Lockdowns: Recent reports of Hantavirus cases have revived fears of lockdowns, reminiscent of the COVID-19 experience. The media's portrayal has triggered discussions on universal contact tracing and health precautions.

• Political Commentary: Some public figures advocate for more severe lockdowns, highlighting a reluctance to learn from past consequences of such measures. Critics argue that lockdowns primarily disrupt commerce and daily life without demonstrable benefits.

• Precedent of Control: Analysis suggests that the past pandemic experience set a precedent for imposing control through lockdowns. Despite the socio-economic drawbacks witnessed previously, there remains an inclination among some elites to repeat these measures in future health crises.

• Social Resistance: A notable portion of the population has expressed opposition to renewed lockdowns, catalyzed by social media discussions. However, there are concerns about a loss of freedom and the potential for new coercive measures against dissenters.

• Institutional Response: The Brownstone Institute emphasizes its role as a defender of individual rights and rational discourse amid ongoing debates about public health strategies. The organization has produced an extensive body of work analyzing pandemic responses and advocating for freedom.

• Impact of Previous Lockdowns: The fallout from past lockdowns includes significant economic challenges, increased national debt, and declining workforce participation. The call to avoid similar restrictions in the future remains unheeded by many decision-makers.

• Controversy in Public Health Messaging: The discourse surrounding various health crises is influenced by alarmist media narratives. This often shifts focus away from pressing health issues prevalent in society and fuels further panic rather than informed responses.

• Ongoing Threats: The article identifies that certain entities, including those involved with the World Health Organization, are prepared to reintroduce stringent measures, including vaccine mandates, under the guise of public safety. A digital ID system is highlighted as a potential tool for enforcing compliance.

• The Role of Brownstone Institute: Founded to promote clarity and rationality, the Brownstone Institute seeks support to continue its influential work against unnecessary lockdowns and authoritarian practices related to public health. This includes fostering dialogue and mobilizing resistance among communities.

The content serves as a warning against the potential resurgence of lockdowns and the implications for individual freedoms. The Brownstone Institute calls for public support to safeguard against future impositions, aiming to keep the lessons learned from past experiences at the forefront of societal response to new health threats. This dialogue emphasizes the importance of vigilance in preserving personal liberties in the face of institutional power.

https://brownstone.org/articles/dont-be-locked-down/

Nuclear Buildout Accelerates With Goldman Now Including SMRs Into Forecast

Goldman's report on nuclear power indicates a significant expansion in nuclear energy, highlighting both large reactors and small modular reactors (SMRs). This development is accompanied by concerns regarding potential uranium supply deficits.

• Nuclear Power Expansion: The progress in nuclear reactor construction is gaining traction. For instance, Canada’s Bruce Power is collaborating with SaskPower to evaluate large reactor technologies, while Duke Energy’s Robinson plant in South Carolina has received approval for extended operation until 2050.

• U. S. Regulatory Approvals: The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has renewed licenses for several reactors, allowing operation for up to 80 years. This includes the St. Lucie plant in Florida, ensuring long-term nuclear energy generation.

• Small Modular Reactors Included: Goldman's analyst Brian Lee has integrated SMRs into uranium supply forecasts, predicting nearly 46 GW of SMR deployments by 2045. This could increase uranium demand significantly.

• Uranium Pricing Trends: Uranium prices have stabilized, with spot prices around $80 per pound and term prices near $90 per pound, despite the expected cumulative supply shortage of 2.3 billion pounds from 2025 to 2045.

• Investment Needs: The report indicates a need for around $170 billion to secure the domestic nuclear fuel supply chain in the U. S., covering mining, milling, and enrichment.

As nuclear power builds momentum, particularly through SMRs, significant uranium supply challenges are foreseen. Addressing these supply constraints is crucial to meet the growing demand for nuclear energy in the coming decades.

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/nuclear-buildout-accelerates-goldman-now-including-smrs-forecast

The Climate Myth that Sought to Change Our Way of Life

For over thirty years, climate policy has been influenced by the belief that growing populations and economies would consistently put more pressure on the environment. Recently, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) announced a noteworthy development regarding this assumption.

1. IPCC Announcement: On May 5, 2026, the IPCC deemed the extreme climate scenario known as RCP 8.5 as "unlikely. " This scenario had been a major basis for climate discussions and driven many policies, taxes, and restrictions.

2. Criticism of RCP 8.5: Critics point out that this scenario was unrealistic from the beginning, as it depended on a projection of 13 billion people globally, which demographers argued against.

3. Shift in Demographics: The main factor affecting climate policy is now demographic changes, rather than technological advancements. Fertility rates are declining worldwide, with many countries, including India and the United States, reporting below-replacement levels.

4. Population Projections: If the global fertility rate stabilizes at around 1.5 children per woman, the world population may peak at about 8.5 billion and then decline. This contrasts sharply with earlier predictions of continuous growth.

5. Reassessing Climate Policy: Current climate policies focused on controlling the economy to prevent environmental damage do not align with the demographic trend of population decline. Education and economic empowerment are significant drivers for stabilizing population and improving environmental conditions.

The changing global demographics indicate that the assumptions driving climate policy must be re-evaluated. Recognizing the reality of a population decline can reshape how we think about climate actions and economic growth. Current environmental strategies should adapt accordingly to reflect this new understanding.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/05/the_climate_myth_that_sought_to_change_our_way_of_life.html

Democrats Tell Pollsters They’d Happily Ditch Black Districts To Get More Power

Recent discussions reveal that some Democrats are willing to eliminate black-majority congressional districts through redistricting to gain more political power, despite previously denouncing such moves as racist.

1. Polling Insights: A Politico poll indicates that many Democrats prioritize political advantage over maintaining race-based districting. A significant portion of those polled would sacrifice black voting power to counter Republican efforts.

2. Supreme Court's Ruling: The recent Supreme Court decision on the Voting Rights Act clarified that Section 2 prohibits intentional racial discrimination without mandating race-based gerrymandering. This change may encourage states like Louisiana, Tennessee, and Florida to redistrict.

3. Virginia's Setback: Democrats faced a setback in Virginia where the state Supreme Court struck down a proposed redistricting plan favoring Democrats as unconstitutional.

4. Contradictions in Messaging: Democrat leaders, like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and former Vice President Kamala Harris, have criticized the Supreme Court ruling while their constituents express willingness to abandon majority-minority districts if it benefits the party politically.

5. Goals of Redistricting: The primary goal for both Democratic leaders and voters appears to be the retention of party power, regardless of previous stances on race-based representation.

The political landscape is evolving as Democrats weigh the implications of redistricting decisions against the backdrop of power dynamics. This shift highlights a potential inconsistency between public statements about representation and the underlying motivations driven by political advantage.

https://thefederalist.com/2026/05/14/democrats-tell-pollsters-theyd-happily-ditch-black-districts-to-get-more-power/

Nonprofit Crackdown: Feds target the liberal dark money infrastructure

Recent efforts by the Trump administration and lawmakers are focusing on the regulations and financial transparency of politically active nonprofit organizations, particularly those associated with progressive or liberal movements in the United States. These investigations mainly scrutinize the anonymity and tax-exempt status of several influential nonprofit groups, aiming to uncover possible violations in campaign finance laws and political ethics.

• Investigation Overview

Government agencies, including the House Oversight Committee, the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the IRS, are probing into various nonprofit organizations that allegedly operate as part of a "dark money" network supporting left-leaning political activities.

• Focus on the Sixteen Thirty Fund

The House Oversight Committee has issued a subpoena to the Sixteen Thirty Fund, a major nonprofit managed by Arabella Advisors. The investigation looks into the Chorus program, which allegedly employs social media influencers to promote political messages favoring Democrats without adhering to federal campaign finance disclosure laws.

• Chorus Program Allegations

Reports indicate that the Chorus program pays influencers up to $8,000 monthly to advocate for Democratic positions while requiring them to remain silent about their funding. This has raised concerns about ethical practices in political campaigning.

• Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) Scrutiny

The DOJ has also investigated the SPLC, which has been indicted for supposedly channeling over $3 million to individuals linked with extremist groups using a network of shell companies. This has sparked controversy regarding the organization’s influence and claims about monitoring hate groups.

• Foreign Influence Concerns

Investigators are examining links between certain nonprofits and foreign entities, particularly a network associated with Neville Roy Singham, who allegedly has connections with the Chinese Communist Party. Lawmakers are calling for the IRS to investigate these groups for possible violations of tax-exempt laws.

• Responses from Nonprofits

The entities involved, including the Sixteen Thirty Fund and SPLC, have defended their operations, insisting that they comply with existing laws and asserting the legitimacy of their missions. Critics, however, argue that these organizations exploit their tax-exempt statuses to conduct partisan political activities without transparency.

• Legislative Actions and Calls for Accountability

Republican lawmakers are pushing the executive branch to actively evaluate the operations of these nonprofits. Some prominent Republican figures contend that these organizations engage in activities that infringe upon U. S. political processes, violating laws designed to maintain transparency in political funding.

The ongoing investigations into the nonprofit sector's political funding have raised significant questions about financial transparency and the ethical implications of tax-exempt status for organizations involved in political advocacy. With major scrutiny on groups like the Sixteen Thirty Fund and the SPLC, the outcomes of these inquiries could lead to substantial changes in the regulation of nonprofit political activities in the United States.

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/nonprofit-crackdown-feds-target-liberal-dark-money-infrastructure

Unbridled Spending: Billions for Medicaid Expansion Congress Never Approved

The Biden administration's efforts to increase federal funding for Medicaid home healthcare faced challenges in Congress but ultimately resulted in significant spending growth. This summary highlights the key developments in Medicaid home healthcare spending, the implications for nursing home use, and issues of fraud and oversight.

1. Funding Growth Despite Legislative Challenges:

• In March 2021, the Biden administration proposed $400 billion over eight years to enhance home and community-based care under Medicaid. Congress did not approve the initial funding requests but state Medicaid agencies managed to expand the program. Spending rose from $24 billion in 2019 to $46.4 billion by 2024, nearly reaching President Biden's desired amount.

2. Increased Home Care Spending:

• Despite the intended aim of reducing nursing home dependency, Medicaid spending on nursing facilities actually increased by nearly $5 billion during the same period, reaching $46.3 billion, indicating more reliance on institutional care in addition to expanded home care services.

3. Fraud and Oversight Issues:

• The rapid growth of the home care program raised concerns about fraud, with many accusations involving false billing for services that were either never rendered or overstated. The Department of Justice has been involved in prosecuting multiple fraudulent schemes as states expanded their home care programs without adequate oversight.

4. State-Level Funding Mechanisms:

• When federal approval stalled, states utilized existing programs and waivers to access additional funds. For example, New York's Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program became the largest line item in Medicaid home care spending, allowing beneficiaries to employ family members as caregivers. Other states, like Texas and Alabama, also saw significant increases in funding.

5. Demographics and Demand for Services:

• Despite the growth in funding for home care, waiting lists for services have continued to grow, signaling an increasing demand that outpaces the expansion of available services.

6. Trends in Nursing Home Usage:

• The number of unique Medicaid nursing home users declined from 1.57 million in 2019 to 1.29 million in 2023, primarily due to the pandemic's impact on admissions. However, numbers began to rise again post-pandemic, alongside increasing nursing home costs.

7. Rising Costs and Spending Patterns:

• States significantly increased reimbursement rates for both home and nursing home care, straining Medicaid budgets. The average cost per resident in nursing homes increased by 28%, reflecting a trend of elevated spending without a clear reduction in the demand for nursing home placement.

The substantial increase in Medicaid funding for home healthcare reflects a shift towards community-based care, yet challenges such as fraud, oversight issues, and continued reliance on nursing facilities persist. Moving forward, balancing adequate funding while ensuring effective oversight and addressing the growing need for home care services will be critical.

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2026/05/14/unbridled_spending_billions_for_medicaid_program_congress_never_approved_1182576.html