BLOCKADE AND RIOT: How Soros & Gates-Backed Activists Are Already Training For A Contested Election

Free DC is an activist organization preparing for potential election-related protests, claiming they are ready to enforce election results if necessary. Their plans include recruiting activists for training sessions focused on protest scenarios.

Training Sessions: Free DC is organizing a training event scheduled for September 26 to discuss "election enforcement" and role-play protest scenarios.

Contingency Plans: Organizers have outlined strategies for protests including intersection blockades, marches to the Capitol, and coordinated withdrawals from work or school if primary results are contested.

Support and Funding: The organization has backing from major groups such as the Open Society Policy Center, Melinda French Gates’ Pivotal Ventures, and the Pritzker Family Foundation. This support aids their operations and outreach.

Past Preparations: Free DC has previously planned nonviolent actions in response to election disputes but did not activate them during recent events. They have also trained volunteers as part of an election protection initiative.

Wider Connections: Free DC collaborates with organizations like Future Currents, which conducts scenario exercises to help groups manage political crises. This includes strategic planning for future governance situations.

Requirements for Participation: The training requires previous non-cooperation training and participant screening to ensure safety, but details about the training content and instructors remain undisclosed.

Free DC's preparations for the midterms illustrate a proactive approach to potential election disputes, supported by influential donors. However, questions remain about the authority and evidence required for their proposed actions against contested election results. 

https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/blockade-and-riot-how-soros-and-gates?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=3382126&post_id=216519592&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Note To The Rest Of The Country: Please Don’t Vote Like California

California has experienced a decrease in population recently, marking the first time in history that the state's numbers have contracted. Despite this trend, government expansion continues, highlighting potential missteps in voter decision-making. The article critiques California's state governance and offers a warning to the rest of the country regarding voting behaviors.

1. Population Decline: California's population peaked at 39.53 million in 2019 but fell to 39.03 million by 2022, with no anticipated growth for three years starting in 2027.

2. Government Growth: Despite the population decline, California's state workforce grew by 4% from 2019 to 2024, adding around 20,000 employees. This period saw significant increases in management and supervisory positions.

3. Spending Increases: State spending has escalated dramatically, increasing by $100 billion since the 2019-20 fiscal year. The per capita spending has surpassed $8,800, with compensation costs rising notably.

4. Political Dynamics: The editorial suggests that California’s dominant political party exhibits a preference for an expansive government over civil society. The governance model in California serves as a cautionary example for other states considering similar progressive policies.

5. Impact on Economy: Although California remains the most populous and economically powerful state, the article notes a decline in attractiveness for innovators, workers, and investors due to regulatory and bureaucratic constraints.

6. National Implications: The editorial positions California as a model of problematic governance that other Democratic-led states may seek to emulate. It emphasizes the need for voters nationwide to take heed and make more discerning choices at the ballot box.

California's ongoing population decline and government expansion reflect significant issues in governance and voter decision-making. The editorial warns other states to avoid California's path by voting thoughtfully and pushing back against leftist policies that could jeopardize their future. The midterm elections are seen as an opportunity for voters to steer the nation away from the perceived threats posed by California's experience. 

https://issuesinsights.com/2026/10/21/note-to-the-rest-of-the-country-please-dont-vote-like-california/

Accountability Is All That Matters Now

Recent document releases have shed light on serious atrocities committed during the Covid response by public health authorities. The author, who has written extensively on this topic for the Brownstone Journal, feels there is little left to add, citing previous works that have addressed these issues.

1. The author has published multiple articles examining the negative aspects of the Covid response, questioning the meaning of "Never again" in this context.

2. Past writing has included concerns about the breach of the Nuremberg Code regarding informed consent in public health practices.

3. While the author feels that further writing may be redundant, they acknowledge a growing awareness among others about these issues.

4. Accountability for these actions is emphasized as crucial, arguing that similar abuses can occur again without it.

5. The author compares potential accountability measures to historical events like Watergate and the Nazi Doctors’ Trial, advocating for significant legal consequences.

6. There is skepticism toward the public health system's ability to self-correct, suggesting that meaningful accountability must come through the justice system.

The author insists that without substantial accountability for the actions taken during the Covid response, such violations will continue to pose a threat to humanity. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/accountability-is-all-that-matters-now/

COVID Coverup: FDA Suppressing Evidence of Vaccine’s Risks for Children

 In 2022, safety officers from the FDA began examining reports of adverse effects and deaths in children following COVID-19 vaccinations. Initial findings suggested a link between the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna and several adolescent deaths. Despite this, as of December 2023, the FDA has not issued any warnings regarding these potential risks.

1. Initial Findings and Recommendations:

Safety officers found evidence suggesting that some adolescents died from the COVID vaccines, specifically due to fatal myocarditis.

Dr. Meghna Alimchandani, the leading safety officer, recommended that vaccine labels be updated to reflect these risks, but no action has been taken.

2. Political and Institutional Barriers:

Both Trump’s and Biden’s administrations demonstrated reluctance to address the findings publicly, with concerns that it would complicate the narrative about vaccine safety.

The pharmaceutical industry and media outlets, including the New York Times, have also been criticized for downplaying the risks associated with the COVID vaccines.

3. The Role of VAERS:

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has received over a million reports of injuries post-vaccination.

Officials like CDC Director Rochelle Walensky downplayed the significance of these reports, stating they do not prove causation.

4. Scientific Reports of Vaccine Risks:

Findings in peer-reviewed studies pointed to cases of myocarditis and other serious conditions in vaccinated children.

A citizen petition led by former FDA advisor Kim Witczak requested updates to vaccine warnings, mostly denied by the FDA.

5. Internal FDA Investigations:

New evidence came to light indicating that internal investigations about vaccine safety risks were ignored.

Dr. Tracy Beth Høeg discovered that FDA staff had compiled autopsy reports detailing deaths linked to vaccinations.

6. Media Coverage and Its Impact:

The New York Times has been accused of distorting information regarding FDA findings on vaccine risks, which has shaped public perception about the safety of vaccines.

Critics argue that the media's rush to protect vaccine narratives has overshadowed significant safety findings.

7. Continued Advocacy and Investigation:

Senator Ron Johnson and others are pushing for continued investigations into the FDA's handling of vaccine risk information, aiming for transparency in communication about vaccine dangers.

Experts express concern about the lack of informed consent for parents regarding potential risks associated with COVID vaccines for children.

There is ongoing controversy about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines for children, primarily concerning the FDA's handling of adverse effect reports and the media’s portrayal of vaccine safety. As calls for transparency grow, it remains crucial for parents to be informed about all available data regarding vaccine risks to make informed decisions for their children’s health.

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2026/10/20/covid_coverup_fda_suppressing_evidence_of_vaccines_risks_for_children_1212710.html

The French Revolution of the 21st Century: From the Guillotine to the Suicide Vest

Itxu Díaz explores the modern implications of the French Revolution, particularly through the lens of recent riots and protests in Paris. It draws parallels between the historical events of the Revolution and current issues facing France, suggesting a persistent undercurrent of violence and division in French society.

1. Historical Context of the Guillotine:

During the French Revolution, the guillotine became synonymous with the pursuit of equality, initially intended for aristocrats and later used on commoners.

The revolutionaries embraced the guillotine, which transformed executions into a spectacle, asserting that individuality was a threat to equality.

2. Ceremonial Aspects:

The execution ceremonies surrounding the guillotine changed traditional practices, replacing them with ritualistic bloodletting that symbolized the power of the revolutionary government.

3. Cultural Impact:

The Revolution’s aftermath was marked by the emergence of new ideologies like secularism and rationalism, leading to significant cultural shifts in France, including the extermination of Christians.

4. Modern Reflection on Violence:

Díaz argues that France has never fully recovered from the Terror, suggesting modern acts of violence, especially by Islamist groups, parallel the earlier revolutionary violence.

The French government's response to these acts often attributes them to mental illness, obscuring the underlying issues of ethnic and religious tensions.

5. Political Landscape:

French leaders, such as Hollande and Macron, are criticized for failing to address or acknowledge the realities of a changing demographic and political landscape in France.

As the country faces protests and riots, there’s an implication that these actions are orchestrated by radical elements bent on disrupting governance.

6. Future of France:

The article concludes with a dire warning about the continuing challenges France faces and suggests that only a return to Christian values can save the nation.

Díaz paints a picture of France as a nation grappling with the shadows of its revolutionary past while facing new forms of conflict and social upheaval. He raises concerns about the role of governmental leadership and the historical lessons that seem to remain unheeded. As France witnesses a resurgence of violence, particularly from Islamist factions, the piece underscores the urgent need for a renewed focus on unity and shared values to rebuild the nation. 

https://spectator.org/the-french-revolution-of-the-21st-century-from-the-guillotine-to-the-suicide-vest/

Husband of Democratic Party Chair Charged with Stealing $20 Million from Federal Education Grants

Michael Perik, husband of Liz Beretta-Perik, the Chair of the Rhode Island Democratic Party, was indicted for allegedly stealing $20 million through a fraudulent education grant scheme linked to Ohio’s Eastern Gateway Community College. The indictment has significant implications for both Perik and the college involved.

Perik was indicted for theft, fraud, bribery, and money laundering, among other charges.

He is alleged to have operated through educational consulting companies that diverted federal and state financial aid, including Pell grants.

The indictment highlights that the scheme included falsifying records and retaining aid for ineligible students.

Along with Perik, two others, Nicole Rowe Colclasure and Michael Geoghegan, were also indicted.

State Auditor Keith Faber expressed concern that public resources meant for disadvantaged students were misappropriated.

The alleged fraudulent activities occurred between January 2017 and March 2022, resulting in millions in wrongful payments.

U.S. Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent condemned the scheme, affirming the government's commitment to tackling fraud in education.

Perik has made substantial political donations, totaling nearly $50,000 to the Rhode Island Democratic state committee and over $75,000 to individual politicians, including Governor Dan McKee.

In response to the charges, Perik's attorney described the indictment as "political retribution" and insisted Perik acted within the law.

The case against Michael Perik raises serious questions about accountability in the management of educational funds intended to support students. As the legal process unfolds, the implications for Perik and the broader community continue to develop, with Perik's attorney denying wrongdoing and claiming the charges are politically motivated. 

https://www.westernjournal.com/husband-democratic-party-chair-charged-stealing-20-million-federal-education-grants/

Taxpayer Funded NGOs and Translators Are Busing Somali Voters to the Polls in Maine

Reports indicate that in Lewiston, Maine, taxpayer-funded NGOs are reportedly transporting Somali voters to polling places and providing translators during early voting. This raises questions about election integrity and potential partisan influences.

Busing of Somali Voters: NGOs are observed busing groups of Somali voters to the polls in Lewiston, assisted by translators paid by taxpayer funds.

Voting Behavior Speculation: There is speculation regarding which party these voters are likely supporting, with implications that it may benefit Democrats due to the demographic makeup of the community.

NGO Involvement and Election Conduct: Critics argue that the NGOs' actions might violate electioneering rules by unduly influencing the voting process.

Quid Pro Quo Allegations: There are claims that the arrangement between certain Somalis and Democrats suggests an exchange of votes for financial support or benefits from social services.

Media Reaction: Instances of critics downplaying these concerns as "conspiracy theories" are noted, despite growing evidence and observations during the voting process. This raises questions about media accountability in reporting such events.

The situation in Lewiston presents significant concerns over potential electoral manipulation and the role of NGOs in influencing voter behavior. The practices being reported could impact the overall electoral integrity, prompting a need for further scrutiny and transparency in the voting process. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/10/report-taxpayer-funded-ngos-translators-are-busing-somali/