Monday, February 23, 2026

 

Lindsey Graham’s Pattern of Controlled Opposition

By Staff Writer

He’s long been a gatekeeper figure someone positioned inside the Republican apparatus to appear loyal to populist causes while neutralizing real threats to the uniparty structure. We saw it.

• Russiagate: Graham stalled the Senate Judiciary Committee’s subpoena power for months, ensuring the Obama era intelligence actors weren’t exposed.

• Ukraine Impeachment era: He made loud noises defending Trump, yet refused to use committee power to force testimony or document declassification.

• Foreign Policy: He consistently pushes neoconservative interventionist positions identical to the Clinton/Biden wing signaling allegiance to the military industrial status quo.

The Forgotten Truth: How America’s History Was Rewritten and Sold Back to Us

 


By Staff Writer

In 2026, Americans live inside a curated story. It’s a story written not by historians committed to truth, but by institutions that obsess over control. For over a century, our textbooks, our documentaries, and our nightly news have conspired sometimes quietly, sometimes brazenly to define national memory in a way that keeps the public obedient and the powerful untouchable.

The illusion worked for decades. It began to unravel when millions watched the media lie not subtly, but shamelessly about events happening right in front of them.

First came Russiagate, the phantom scandal that weaponized paranoia to kneecap a presidency. Then came the “mostly peaceful” protests that left cities in flames. The same media class that once swore truth was sacred began manipulating language with contemptuous precision. They censored dissenters who questioned lock downs, defamed parents who opposed gender indoctrination in schools, and silenced anyone challenging the church of climate orthodoxy.

Most Americans thought the deception was new. It isn’t. It’s the continuation of a long tradition the domestication of the human mind by those who claim to enlighten it.

Every empire rewrites its past. The American ruling class is no different; it simply learned to do it with style.

Take the Civil War: we are taught that the North fought merely to end slavery and the South merely to defend it a moral parable so simple that it dissolves complexity itself. The truth is tangled. Northern financiers enriched themselves on Southern cotton even as they funded abolitionist rhetoric. Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and jailed journalists. Far from a war between good and evil, it was a collision of competing economic systems one industrial, one agrarian both guilty of exploiting human beings.

Or look at the Revolutionary War. High school textbooks frame it as a spontaneous uprising for freedom. But who financed it? And what did freedom really mean to the elite landowners drafting the Constitution while ordinary men bled on the battlefields? Few students are told that the Founding Fathers were themselves divided some fiercely opposed the banking system that would later enslave the country through debt, others quietly desired it.

And yet, ask these questions aloud and you’re branded revisionist, as though revising inaccurate history were a sin rather than a duty.

Into this landscape steps the curator class figures like Ken Burns and the academic historians who orbit him. Polite, eloquent, and institutionally adored, Burns has become the high priest of a secular religion: American Exceptionalism seasoned with modern liberal guilt.

Every frame of his documentaries is lacquered with inevitability as though history moves by moral gravity toward the present power structure. His projects are immersive, emotional, and undeniably beautiful. But beauty is not truth. In many cases, it’s camouflage.

The Burns model of storytelling depends on omission: the unrecorded motives behind policy decisions, the quietly orchestrated economic pressures, the silenced counter-narratives. What’s left in is what reinforces the mythology, what’s left out could shatter it.

Our collective ignorance is not accidental, it’s engineered. When history is rewritten to erase the manipulations, atrocities, and betrayals of past elites, people forget how power operates. They lose the ability to recognize the same tactics in the present.

Ask yourself:

Who funds the university history departments that decide what’s acceptable scholarship?

Who owns the publishing houses that determine which historians become household names?

Who benefits when Americans are taught that the nation was always destined to become what it is now?

The answers, unsurprisingly, circle back to the same tight network of financial, political, and media elites who control today’s narratives in real time. They built careers turning myth into identity.

That’s why a group of independent researchers, documentary filmmakers, and historians are now taking matters into their own hands. Their goal is simple: restore reality.

By analyzing primary documents never shown to the public, re-examining the financial and geopolitical forces behind famous events, and applying transparent research methods, this project seeks to liberate history from its corporate editors. The initiative will produce multimedia documentaries, investigative series, and open-source archives allowing anyone to verify the findings firsthand.

No intermediaries. No gatekeepers. No experts paid by foundations with agendas.

Just evidence raw and unfiltered.

Because a people severed from their true past are easily manipulated. They will fight over semantics while their economy is hollowed out, their currency devalued, their privacy auctioned to Silicon Valley, and their children indoctrinated into emotional chaos.

History, when falsified, becomes a weapon.

But when told truthfully, it becomes the antidote a map back to reality.

The great deception of our time is not that history is forgotten, but that it has been replaced by a narrative economy an industry that packages illusion as enlightenment.

The age of passive consumption is over. Americans have begun to ask not only what happened, but who benefits from the story we’re told about what happened.

When that question becomes common knowledge, the empire of lies will collapse under its own contradictions.

And perhaps, for the first time in generations, we will finally meet the real America not as she was imagined, but as she truly is.

Kari Lake is Breaking Through Regime Censorship, Delivering President Trump’s Message with USAGM

Kari Lake, head of the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM), discussed her efforts to reform the agency and the criticism she faces from the media. This interview outlines her initiatives to combat corruption within the agency, reduce its size, and ensure the media’s alignment with American values.

1. Reforming USAGM:

• Lake is leading changes at USAGM, aiming to reduce its workforce by 85%, in line with President Trump's goal to shrink government bureaucracy.

• She asserts that advancements in technology mean fewer employees are needed for effective operations.

2. Combatting Corruption:

• Lake highlights the agency’s past output of sometimes anti-American news and emphasizes the need for content funded by taxpayers to be in line with their expectations.

• She aims to root out corruption, waste, and the influence of globalist agendas within USAGM.

3. Challenges and Criticism:

• Lake faces aggressive pushback from left-leaning media outlets that claim her reforms damage USAGM’s ability to broadcast effectively and communicate U. S. policy worldwide.

• Reports from outlets like The Atlantic and Washington Post accuse her of mismanagement and hindering freedom of expression, particularly regarding news related to Iran.

4. Allegations of Restricting Information Access:

• Some media narratives suggest that Lake is blocking services that could provide information to the Iranian public during protests against their regime.

• Disputes have arisen over funding for virtual private network (VPN) services intended to facilitate internet access in Iran, with Lake asserting that her expedited funding plan would be more effective than traditional methods.

5. Lake’s Stance on Funding and Collaboration:

• She advocates for faster access to resources for Iranian citizens, criticizing complicated funding routes that delay assistance.

• Lake maintains she is collaborating with the State Department to support information dissemination amidst challenges posed by the Iranian government.

6. Transparency Issues:

• Emphasizing the need for oversight, Lake has criticized the opaque operations of organizations funded by USAGM, such as the Open Technology Fund (OTF).

• She compared OTF’s operations to a "slush fund", underscoring irregularities in financial transparency and accountability.

Kari Lake's efforts to reform the USAGM focus on reducing corruption, aligning the agency's messaging with American values, and delivering timely information to international audiences. Despite facing significant criticism from various media organizations and political figures, she remains committed to these goals and aims to transition the agency’s functions to the State Department in the future. The ongoing disputes over funding and operational transparency reflect broader tensions within government journalism and media communication strategies. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/02/exclusive-interview-kari-lake-is-breaking-through-regime/

CIA Admits There Was Political Bias In Obama-Era Intelligence

The CIA has officially recognized that some intelligence reports from the Obama administration were biased politically. This acknowledgment comes after an internal review revealed that nineteen intelligence products did not meet standards of objectivity.

• Director's Statement: CIA Director John Ratcliffe announced the retraction or revision of nineteen intelligence products, citing a failure to maintain impartiality.

• Review Findings: The President's Intelligence Advisory Board (PIAB) found that these reports were influenced by political considerations and insufficient analytic tradecraft.

• Response to Criticism: Ratcliffe emphasized that there is no room for bias in analyses to ensure transparency and accountability within the CIA.

• Historical Context: The flawed reports were produced during Barack Obama’s presidency, coinciding with notable events like the Russian collusion claims.

• Political Reactions:

• Democrats' Perspective: Senator Mark Warner expressed concern that such retractions could undermine trust in the intelligence community and warned against political interference in intelligence assessments.

• Republicans' Support: Senator Tom Cotton welcomed the retractions, criticizing previous administrations for blending politics with intelligence analysis.

The CIA's admission of political bias in certain reports raises serious questions about the integrity of intelligence during the Obama administration. It highlights the need for the agency to adhere strictly to impartiality to maintain public confidence in its work. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/cia-admits-there-was-political-bias-obama-era-intelligence

Trump 2.0's Grand Strategy Against China Is Slowly But Surely Coming Together

Trump and his team, known as Trump 2.0, are devising a strategic plan to contain China without escalating to war. Their actions abroad should be interpreted as moves toward this objective.

1. Containment Strategy: Trump 2.0 aims to pressure China economically and politically, encouraging a trade deal that shifts China's economy toward domestic consumption.

2. Avoiding Conflict: The plan seeks to avoid a direct conflict similar to Japan's in WWII, opting for a gradual approach that restrains China’s access to markets and resources.

3. Economic Leverage: U. S. trade deals with the EU and India may limit China's market access, using tariffs as a threat if necessary.

4. Resource Control: U. S. operations in Venezuela, pressure on Iran, and efforts to influence energy producers like Nigeria are aimed at cutting China's resource supply.

5. Russia's Role: Russia faces a choice between aligning more closely with China or seeking a deal with the U. S., which may impact China's resource access and affect U. S.-China relations.

6. Risk of War: If Trump 2.0 can't negotiate with Russia, tensions with China could escalate, increasing the risk of conflict.

Trump 2.0's strategy focuses on containing China through economic pressures and negotiations instead of outright conflict, aiming to stabilize international relations while managing risks. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/trump-20s-grand-strategy-against-china-slowly-surely-coming-together

China’s ‘Magic Weapon’ Reaches Deep Into America and the West

China's strategies for global influence extend deeply into the West, involving espionage, propaganda, and the establishment of unauthorized police operations. The activities spotlighted raise concerns about China’s attempts to monitor and intimidate critics abroad.

1. Chinese Police Stations Abroad:

• In 2023, two Chinese-Americans were arrested in New York for running a clandestine police station aimed at monitoring dissidents.

• The Department of Justice revealed this operation was not unique; over 102 such police stations exist globally, posing a direct challenge to sovereignty.

2. History of the United Front:

• Mao Zedong established the United Front Work Department, one of three tools for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), focusing on international influence and control.

• Current leader Xi Jinping continues to utilize these strategies for national rejuvenation and extending Chinese reach globally.

3. Global Network of Influence:

• The CCP has cultivated a vast network of over 2,000 overseas Chinese groups in democratic countries like the U. S., U. K., Canada, and Germany, with the total possibly reaching tens of thousands.

• These groups aim to promote the CCP’s interests through cultural outreach, support for territorial claims, and mitigating international criticism.

4. Espionage and Influence Operations:

• High-profile cases of espionage, such as the theft of Tesla's technology, exemplify the CCP's aggressive technological acquisition strategies.

• The United Front combines engagement and intelligence tactics to sway decision-makers in sectors including education, media, and politics.

5. Surveillance and Intimidation of Chinese Citizens:

• Chinese citizens abroad face pressure to cooperate with the CCP, often fearing repercussions against their families back home.

• Operations like "Fox Hunt" attempt to repatriate dissidents, showcasing the lengths China will go to maintain control over its nationals abroad.

6. Response from U. S. Authorities:

• The increasing number of Chinese police stations has prompted calls for stricter enforcement of laws regulating foreign influence, such as the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).

• Measures are being proposed in Congress to enhance accountability for foreign entities operating in the U. S.

The rising influence and operations of the Chinese Communist Party in the West illustrate a significant challenge to democratic societies. To safeguard against these threats, it is crucial for lawmakers to act decisively, ensuring stronger regulations and enforcement to dismantle these networks of espionage and influence. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/02/china_s_magic_weapon_reaches_deep_into_america_and_the_west.html

Russiagate quietly reaches Supreme Court as justices asked to allow feds to be sued for FISA abuses

Carter Page, a figure involved in the Russiagate investigation, has taken his legal battle to the Supreme Court. He claims that federal officials violated his constitutional rights by obtaining a surveillance warrant with incorrect information.

• Background: Carter Page worked as an adviser for Donald Trump's 2016 campaign and was investigated by the FBI for potential Russian interference.

• Lawsuit: In 2020, Page filed a lawsuit against former FBI officials, claiming they misled the court to obtain a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to surveil him, which he argues damaged his reputation and career.

• Court Decisions: Initially, federal courts dismissed Page's lawsuit, even after the Justice Department acknowledged serious errors in the FISA process regarding Page. The courts ruled that these mistakes did not qualify him for monetary damages.

• Current Status: His case reached the Supreme Court after the U. S. Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal. The Supreme Court is currently deciding whether to hear the case, titled "Carter Page v. James B. Comey," with the government's response delayed until mid-March.

• Legal Arguments: Page’s lawyers emphasize the importance of this case for civil liberties, contending that victims of false FISA warrants should have the ability to sue government officials for redress.

Carter Page's case at the Supreme Court could have significant implications for civil liberties and the accountability of federal surveillance practices. The justices have yet to make a final decision on whether to hear the case. 

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/russiagate-quietly-reaches-supreme-court-how-will-justices-rule

  Lindsey Graham’s Pattern of Controlled Opposition By Staff Writer South Carolina Bulletin Feb 23, 2026 He’s long been a gatekeeper figure ...