US PRESS CORPS ONLINE

It's becoming increasingly difficult to discern fact from fiction, and unfortunately the media has a strong bias. They spin stories to make conservatives look bad and will go to great lengths to avoid reporting on the good that comes from conservative policies. There are a few shining lights in the media landscape-brave conservative outlets that report the truth and offer a different perspective. We must support conservative outlets like this one and ensure that our voices are heard.

Monday, March 16, 2026

Leaked Report to Federal Advisers Calls for Urgent Recognition of Covid Vaccine Injuries

A recent leaked report highlights significant issues in the U. S. vaccine safety monitoring system concerning long-term illnesses following Covid-19 vaccinations. This report, prepared for the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), emphasizes the urgent need for reforms to address the recognition and treatment of vaccine injuries.

1. Recognition of Vaccine Injuries:

• For the first time, a federal advisory group has recognized that many individuals suffering from long-term health issues after vaccination have not been adequately acknowledged by the healthcare system.

• The report focuses on a condition termed Post-Acute Covid-19 Vaccination Syndrome (PACVS), which includes various symptoms persisting for weeks or months post-vaccination without clear medical explanations.

2. Symptoms of PACVS:

• Patients with PACVS may experience a range of symptoms affecting multiple body systems, including:

• Severe fatigue

• Cognitive issues

• Nervous system problems

• Cardiovascular issues

• Symptoms can overlap with long Covid conditions, complicating diagnosis and treatment.

3. Challenges in Diagnosis:

• Current healthcare systems typically track vaccine injuries that occur shortly after vaccination, leaving chronic, evolving symptoms overlooked.

• Many patients navigate a complicated healthcare landscape without proper diagnostic codes or guidelines, leading to frustration and inconsistent care.

4. Issues with Reporting Systems:

• Most monitoring systems, like the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), rely on clinicians to recognize and report problems. This passive approach falls short for persistent conditions that develop over time.

• The absence of specific codes for chronic post-vaccination illness complicates documentation and reimbursement, potentially leading to dismissed claims and misdiagnoses.

5. Proposed Recommendations:

• The report encourages three primary reforms:

• Implement specific diagnostic codes for chronic post-vaccination illnesses.

• Develop formal diagnostic guidelines and provide training for clinicians to recognize these issues.

• Establish a national network of specialized centers for long Covid and post-vaccination injuries, overseen by the CDC, to ensure coordinated care and research.

6. Next Steps:

• The proposed measures will be reviewed at the upcoming ACIP meeting scheduled for March 18-19. This meeting could be pivotal in transforming how vaccine injuries are recognized and treated.

• If adopted, these recommendations would not only validate the experiences of patients but also create clearer pathways for diagnosis and treatment.

The leaked report signals a critical step towards recognizing the health impacts associated with Covid-19 vaccinations. It brings to light the need for an evolved approach to vaccine safety that encompasses chronic and complex health issues. The outcome of the ACIP meeting will determine the path forward in addressing these challenges and restoring trust in vaccination programs. Will the healthcare system respond actively to these findings or retreat back to dismissals?

https://brownstone.org/articles/leaked-report-to-federal-advisers-calls-for-urgent-recognition-of-covid-vaccine-injuries/

Even NBC Hack Kristen Welker Just CONFRONTED Sen. Adam Schiff on Live TV for Keeping DHS Shut Down Despite the Threat of TERROR Attacks

Kristen Welker, NBC anchor, confronted Senator Adam Schiff during a live interview about the ongoing shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) amid increasing terror threats in the U. S.

• Confrontation on Live Television: Welker challenged Schiff on the Democratic Party's role in the DHS funding stoppage, which has lasted nearly a month, despite recent terror attacks including a car-ramming in Michigan and a shooting at Old Dominion University in Virginia.

• Warnings from Airlines: The CEOs of major airlines and cargo carriers expressed concern over national security and aviation safety due to the shutdown, urging Congress to resolve the issue quickly.

• Schiff's Response: When asked if it was responsible for Democrats to stall DHS funding amid threats, Schiff claimed that Democrats have tried multiple times to pass funding resolutions, but Republicans rejected them.

• Public Concerns: Welker's question reflects widespread frustration among the public regarding the security risks posed by the funding stalemate, especially following recent incidents of violence.

The interview highlighted the serious implications of the DHS funding shutdown in light of rising terror threats. While Democrats blame Republicans for the deadlock, the concerns from security officials and airline leaders emphasize the urgency of resolving the situation to ensure public safety.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/03/even-nbc-hack-kristen-welker-just-confronted-sen/

Kayleigh McEnany Lays Out the Money Trail — Obama and Biden Showered Iran With Billions While Tehran Built Its Nuclear Program

The financial dealings between the U. S. government and Iran during the Obama and Biden administrations have sparked significant controversy. Kayleigh McEnany, a former White House Press Secretary, has highlighted key instances of financial support to Iran, raising concerns about the implications for American security.

1. Iran Nuclear Deal (2015):

• The Obama administration entered into a nuclear agreement with Iran, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

• Obama claimed the deal would not empower the Iranian regime, assuring that Iran would gain access to about $56 billion in previously frozen assets for economic benefit.

2. Controversial Cash Transfers:

• In January 2016, the U. S. secretly transferred $400 million in cash to Iran on the same day Iran released several detained Americans. This timing raised suspicions of a quid pro quo arrangement.

• The total payments linked to the settlement from a prior arms dispute amounted to about $1.7 billion, including $1.3 billion in interest.

3. Biden's Administration and Continued Financial Support:

• In 2023, the Biden administration authorized Iran access to $6 billion in frozen assets, which was claimed to be for humanitarian purposes.

• Iranian leadership, however, stated they would decide how to use the money, disregarding the restrictions suggested by the U. S. government.

4. Impact on Iran’s Activities:

• Throughout these financial arrangements, Iran expanded its nuclear program and military capabilities. This trend illustrates a sharp contrast to the promised outcomes of moderation and peaceful use of funds.

5. Contrast with Trump's Approach:

• President Donald Trump adopted a different stance, withdrawing from the Obama-era nuclear deal and taking a tougher approach against Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

• Proponents argue this shift marked a clearer separation from the prior financial strategy that they believe only empowered Iran.

The financial engagements with Iran during the Obama and Biden administrations have drawn significant public and media scrutiny. Critics emphasize that rather than moderating Iranian actions, U. S. financial support has allegedly allowed for the enhancement of their military and nuclear capabilities. The debate continues over the implications of these policies for both U. S. foreign policy and global security.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/03/kayleigh-mcenany-lays-money-trail-obama-biden-showered/

What Covid Policy Did to Doctors Who Refused to Stay Silent

During the COVID-19 pandemic, a notable shift occurred in the medical community regarding the way discussions around treatment and policies were conducted. Physicians who traditionally engaged in open debates found themselves under pressure to conform to institutional messaging, leading to significant consequences for those who chose to speak out.

1. Silence in the ICUs: The author, Joseph Varon, recounts the harrowing experience of working in ICUs during COVID-19, marked by silence and a lack of family presence for dying patients. This environment emphasized the simple, crucial relationship between physician and patient.

2. Shift in Medical Culture: Traditionally, medical practice thrived on debate and disagreement, which fostered discovery and innovation. However, during COVID, the focus shifted from exploring treatment options to managing public perception and messaging. Scientific debate was replaced by institutional control.

3. Attacks on Dissent: Physicians who questioned prevailing policies or shared alternative insights faced threats and censorship. Many were warned not to speak out, and some faced discipline from medical boards.

4. Loss of Scientific Discourse: A culture of enforcement replaced that of inquiry and debate. This stifled the normal discourse essential for medical progress, as expressing uncertainty was viewed with suspicion.

5. Personal Experiences of Conformity: The author describes how, following his public statements about COVID treatments and policies, he faced professional repercussions. Despite widespread private agreement among physicians about the need for open discussions, the fear of retaliation led many to remain silent publicly.

6. Consequences of Silence: The fear of losing professional reputations, income, and hospital privileges created an environment where many chose silence, perpetuating a false sense of consensus. This shift fundamentally challenged the principles of medical ethics and inquiry.

7. Long-term Effects: The personal costs were substantial, with many physicians experiencing isolation and career threats. The increasing bureaucratic control over medical practice undermined the autonomy of healthcare professionals.

8. Call for Accountability: The author advocates for documenting the experiences of those affected by pandemic policies to ensure future accountability and prevent similar censorship during future health crises. The goal is to protect the integrity of medical practice and preserve the essential freedom to question and debate.

9. Future Implications: The conclusion stresses the importance of maintaining the right for physicians to challenge authority and question practices in the interest of patient care. Without this freedom, medical practice risks becoming merely a routine of compliance rather than a source of innovation.

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed significant vulnerabilities within modern medicine, particularly regarding the freedom of speech among healthcare professionals. As the healthcare landscape evolves, it is essential for medical professionals to reclaim their right to question and debate, ensuring that patient care remains at the forefront of medical practice. This commitment to open discourse is vital for the future of medicine, where the safety and well-being of patients must always take priority over institutional pressures.

https://brownstone.org/articles/what-covid-policy-did-to-doctors-who-refused-to-stay-silent/

Video shows Arizona center processing ballots in manner that alarmed Congress’ monitors

Concerns have emerged regarding the processing of ballots in Maricopa County, Arizona, during the 2024 election, following a visit by congressional staffers. The issues center around the use of a third-party vendor, raising alarms about election integrity and oversight.

• Congressional Monitoring: Video footage captured by congressional observers revealed that ballots were being processed and verified at a third-party facility, Runbeck Election Services, rather than at the official county election center. This setup alarmed both Republican and Democratic staffers who were on-site.

• Storage and Sorting Issues: The congressional staff reported that completed mail-in ballots were stored in the same area as blank ballots. Concerns arose because there were no bipartisan observers or county election officials present to oversee the process at the Runbeck facility, where critical activities like signature verification were happening.

• Formal Concerns Raised: After their observation, a Republican staffer issued a memo detailing these alarming findings, which was sent to the House Administration Committee, the body responsible for federal election oversight.

• Election Monitoring Guidelines: According to Arizona regulations, election observers are supposed to be present during various stages of ballot handling. However, these rules do not specifically mention third-party sorting sites, which has led to confusion about the security and transparency of the process.

• Past Concerns and Audits: Issues with ballot processing in Maricopa County date back years. A significant audit post-2020 revealed irregularities, including an estimated 200,000 ballots with mismatched signatures that may not have been properly validated. These ongoing disputes reflect deep divisions between party lines regarding election integrity.

• Ongoing Investigations: The situation has prompted requests for investigations into the operations at the Runbeck facility, including concerns from U. S. Representative Abe Hamadeh. He has urged the Justice Department to look into how ballots were managed at the site, questioning the adherence to established protocols.

• Historical Context: Concerns over ballot management have, in recent years, been voiced by both Democrats and Republicans, particularly following the shift to mail-in voting. As Arizona prepares for future elections, these issues remain a topic of active debate, reflecting long-standing worries about election security in the state.

The processing of 2024 election ballots in Maricopa County has raised significant concerns among congressional observers due to the lack of oversight at a third-party facility handling crucial election tasks. This situation has highlighted ongoing issues regarding election transparency and security, further complicating the discourse surrounding election integrity in Arizona. As scrutiny continues, the implications for future elections will be closely watched by both parties and the public.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/new-video-inside-congressional-observers-visit-maricopa-county-ballot

U.S. Senate to hold marathon debate on GOP voter ID bill

The U. S. Senate is set to engage in a lengthy debate regarding a Republican voter ID bill, led by Senate Majority Leader John Thune. This initiative aims to satisfy some Republicans who advocate for a return to the "talking filibuster," prompting Democrats to maintain the debate on the Senate floor.

• Marathon Debate: Thune intends to bring a GOP elections reform bill to the floor, potentially leading to a debate that could last several days.

• Talking Filibuster: This strategy, supported by some Republicans, would force Democrats to maintain the floor to uphold the 60-vote requirement in the Senate.

• SAVE America Act: The proposed legislation mandates photo ID for federal voting, requires proof of citizenship for voter registration, and calls for states to remove noncitizens from voter rolls.

• Criticism from Democrats: Democrats have labeled the bill as “Jim Crow 2.0,” arguing it could hinder access to voting for minorities, the disabled, and married women.

• Republican Defense: Thune and supporters contend that the bill ensures only citizens can vote, questioning Democrats’ motives for opposing the legislation. Senator Eric Schmitt echoed this sentiment, claiming it should not be a controversial issue.

The upcoming Senate debate is poised to highlight the stark divide between Republicans and Democrats over voting regulations. While Republicans aim to enforce stricter voter ID laws, Democrats argue such measures are discriminatory. Thune will push for transparency among Democrats regarding their stance on the SAVE America Act, underscoring the ongoing conflict surrounding voting rights in the U. S.

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/us-senate-hold-marathon-debate-gop-voter-id-bill