Acting AG Todd Blanche Drops NUCLEAR Truth Bomb – “There’s a Ton of Evidence That the 2020 Election Was RIGGED” – CONFIRMS Multiple Criminal Investigations Underway

 Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche recently made a significant announcement regarding ongoing investigations into the 2020 election, claiming that there is substantial evidence suggesting it was rigged.

• Claims of Rigging: During an interview with Maria Bartiromo, Blanche confirmed President Trump's allegations that the 2020 election was rigged, stating, "There’s a ton of evidence that the election was rigged. "

• Ongoing Investigations: Blanche revealed that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is conducting multiple criminal investigations focused on several states, including Arizona and Georgia. These investigations are primarily concerned with verifying voter eligibility and ensuring each vote corresponds to a registered voter.

• Challenges in Investigations: Blanche noted that uncovering the alleged misconduct is challenging due to the efforts made to hide wrongdoing. He emphasized the demand for thorough and diligent law enforcement work.

• Expectations for Findings: Blanche acknowledged the slow progress of the investigations but assured the public that results would be shared once completed, whether through charges or reports.

• Previous Actions of the DOJ: The Trump DOJ, under both Pam Bondi and Todd Blanche, has been reportedly building a case against potential election crimes, with indications that arrests related to these crimes might occur soon.

• Public and Media Reaction: The announcement has generated considerable interest, given the public and media discussions surrounding the legitimacy of the 2020 election. Blanche’s statements challenge the narrative presented by mainstream media and political opponents.

Acting AG Todd Blanche's revelations mark a pivotal moment in the conversation about the 2020 election integrity, with ongoing investigations aiming to uncover alleged misconduct. As these investigations unfold, the public awaits further developments and findings from the DOJ. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/05/huge-acting-ag-todd-blanche-drops-nuclear-truth/

Canada Rethinks Selling Its Crown Jewel Pipeline

 The Canadian government is reconsidering the privatization of the Trans Mountain oil pipeline due to increased demand for Canadian crude oil, particularly from Asia, as global markets shift amidst geopolitical crises. This shift signifies a strategic change in Canada’s approach to its energy exports.

1. Context of Reconsideration:

• The Canadian federal government is thinking about keeping the Trans Mountain pipeline state-owned rather than privatizing it as previously planned. This change is largely due to the growing need for Canadian crude oil to fill gaps left by reduced Middle Eastern supplies.

• Elizabeth Wademan, head of the government entity managing the pipeline, noted that the market conditions have changed significantly since the government acquired the pipeline from Kinder Morgan in 2018.

2. Pipeline Expansion and Impact:

• The Trans Mountain pipeline was expanded at a cost of around $23 billion, boosting its capacity to transport 890,000 barrels of oil per day.

• The expanded pipeline launched in 2024 and is now seen as a significant tool for exporting oil to Asia, particularly China.

3. Shifts in Export Demographics:

• Since the pipeline's expansion, Canadian crude exports to China rose notably, with 70% of shipments from British Columbia going to China by October 2025. This marks a clear shift from the previous reliance on the U. S. as the main destination for Canadian oil.

4. Strategic Importance:

• The Trans Mountain pipeline is now viewed as a "strategically important asset" for Canada, with potential for further expansions to enhance energy security and profitability.

• With oil prices nearing $90 per barrel, the Canadian government sees significant economic opportunities in maintaining ownership of this infrastructure.

5. Geopolitical Context:

• The current geopolitical climate, especially the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, has heightened the importance of Canadian oil as a dependable energy source.

• Fatih Birol of the International Energy Agency emphasized that Canada has a chance to become a key player in the global oil and gas market, highlighting the urgency of capitalizing on this moment.

6. Government Stance:

• The Canadian government is shifting its focus from emissions reduction and alternative energy to maximizing the country's resources in oil and gas. This represents a notable change in policy direction in response to market needs and geopolitical realities.

In light of recent developments, the Canadian government is likely to keep the Trans Mountain pipeline state-owned and focus on strengthening its global position in the oil and gas markets. With a significant demand for Canadian crude, particularly from Asian markets, coupled with rising oil prices and geopolitical tensions affecting traditional supply sources, Canada is poised to leverage its resources for greater economic benefit. The government's strategy marks a significant shift in energy policy and aims to maximize the potential of Canadian oil assets during a pivotal time in global energy dynamics. 

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Canada-Rethinks-Selling-Its-Crown-Jewel-Pipeline.html

Exposing the SPLC, and Celebrating Their Future Demise

 The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), once viewed as a protector of civil rights in the U. S., is now facing serious legal challenges, including federal fraud charges. This shift has sparked significant backlash from various conservative organizations, particularly MassResistance, which celebrates the SPLC's impending downfall and highlights its alleged partisan tactics over the years.

1. Background on SPLC:

• Founded in 1971 in Montgomery, Alabama, the SPLC claims to monitor hate groups and promote tolerance.

• It has amassed a large financial endowment, funded largely by alarmist letters warning about extremism.

2. Allegations Against SPLC:

• The SPLC faces indictments for wire fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering, accused of funneling over $3 million to informants linked with extremist groups it purportedly opposes.

• Critics argue the SPLC has engaged in smear campaigns against conservative groups, branding them as "hate groups” without justification.

3. Impact on Conservative Activism:

• MassResistance cites instances where the SPLC’s labeling harmed their reputation, making them targets of defamation and limiting collaborative efforts with other organizations.

• The SPLC’s "hate map," used to identify and vilify conservatives, has been tied to violent incidents, such as the attack on the Family Research Council (FRC) by a man motivated by the SPLC's designations.

4. Internal Issues and Decline:

• The SPLC's credibility is further undermined by scandals such as sexual harassment claims against cofounder Morris Dees and lawsuits alleging discrimination within the organization.

• Recent revelations have led to internal strife, including significant layoffs and threats to leadership, alongside financial difficulties.

5. Calls for Accountability:

• MassResistance and other conservative organizations urge for comprehensive scrutiny of the SPLC's actions, questioning its influence on government and media.

• The SPLC is criticized for skewing its definitions of hate to attack certain groups while ignoring other forms of extremism.

6. Continued Resistance:

• Despite facing legal and credibility challenges, SPLC claims it will defend itself against these accusations.

• Conservative activists, including MassResistance, remain committed to exposing the SPLC’s activities and fostering alternatives that resist politically motivated labeling.

The SPLC's legal troubles signal a potential shift in the landscape of civil rights advocacy, particularly concerning how organizations are perceived and labeled within political discourse. As MassResistance and others continue to confront and expose the SPLC’s past actions, there’s a growing call for transparency and accountability within influential organizations to ensure fair representation in the fight for civil rights. 

https://amgreatness.com/2026/05/18/exposing-the-splc-and-celebrating-their-future-demise/

Party of Lies and Murder

 The perceptions of assassination attempts against former President Trump from the perspective of Democrats. It highlights how many Democrats do not believe the attempts were real and explores the implications of such beliefs within the context of political violence.

• Widespread Doubt Among Democrats: A significant portion of Democrats, around 85%, do not believe that the assassination attempts against Trump were real. This includes a substantial percentage who think specific incidents were staged.

• Conspiracy Theories: The prevalence of conspiracy theories on social media platforms is influencing these beliefs. Approximately 42% of Democrats think an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania was staged, and about 34% think a similar incident at a recent event was also fabricated.

• Political Implications: The article argues that many Democrats avoid acknowledging the reality of these assassination attempts due to fear of political repercussions. They wish to deny responsibility and not see Trump gain sympathy as a martyr.

• Merchandise and Messaging: Items that express wishes for Trump's death, such as t-shirts and other merchandise, raise questions about the Democrats' genuine sentiments towards violence. The author emphasizes the contradiction between their denial of responsibility for violence and the public expressions of such sentiments.

• Allegations of Political Cowardice: The article suggests that Democrats deny the reality of these attempts not because they oppose killing Trump, but rather to prevent their party from facing political fallout. It claims that this reflects a deeper issue within the party concerning accepting responsibility for extremist behavior.

• Comparison to Extremist Behavior: The text draws parallels between the Democrats' denial of violence against Trump and the behavior of fanatic groups, suggesting that the political consequences of acknowledging such truths would conflict with their narrative.

• Party Transformation: The article concludes that the Democratic Party has shifted from a democratic organization to one that engages in revolutionary extremism, using violence as a means to achieve its political objectives.

The content argues that a lack of acceptance of the assassination attempts against Trump among Democrats reveals a deeper issue within the party regarding political violence and accountability. The author portrays the modern Democratic Party as one aligned with extremist behaviors, covering for violence while denying involvement in it. This denial, the author claims, is foundational to the party's extremist narrative, serving to absolve its members of the moral implications of political violence. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/party-of-lies-and-murder/

Devoured by Bad Government

 Restaurants have faced significant challenges recently due to a combination of government policies, rising costs, crime, and economic pressures stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic. A speech by former President Trump to McDonald's franchise owners highlighted many of these issues, showing how they reflect broader economic concerns.

1. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic:

• The restaurant industry suffered greatly during the pandemic, with many establishments closing permanently and job losses soaring. By 2022, about 70,000–110,000 restaurants had not reopened.

2. Rising Costs:

• Many restaurants are dealing with soaring food and labor costs. From 2020 to mid-2025, costs increased by about 35%, forcing many establishments to raise menu prices by nearly a third.

3. Minimum Wage Increases:

• Significant increases in minimum wage, especially in states governed by Democrats, have greatly affected profitability. For example, California's minimum wage rose from $9 in 2014 to $16, with plans for it to reach $20.

4. Regulatory Burdens:

• New federal regulations, such as the 80–20 rule for tipped workers and energy mandates, have increased operational costs and presented new challenges for restaurant owners.

5. Crime and Safety Issues:

• Rising crime, especially in urban areas, has deterred customers from eating out. Restaurants have faced increased theft, vandalism, and violence, negatively impacting business operations.

6. Energy Costs:

• Restaurants are heavily reliant on energy, and costs have escalated sharply, with average monthly bills rising significantly. Many places reported energy bills doubling due to various state policies.

7. Geographic Disparities:

• The challenges faced by restaurants are unevenly distributed across the country, with those in high-cost states struggling more than those in areas with lower operational costs.

8. Government Policy and Business Viability:

• There is concern that the current political stance and policies may not be conducive to the survival of many restaurants, especially small businesses that define the industry.

The restaurant industry has been battered by multiple factors, including regulatory challenges, rising costs, crime, and the lingering effects of the pandemic. As Trump discussed, the industry's ability to thrive hinges on favorable government policies that allow these small businesses to succeed, indicating a critical juncture for the sector. The ongoing struggles highlight the importance of balanced policies in ensuring the viability of restaurants across America. 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/restaurants-trump-affordability-crisis-regulation

Americans Sent $282 Billion to Foreign Bondholders Last Year as National Debt Crosses $30 Trillion

 A recent report reveals critical information about the United States national debt and its implications for taxpayers. Key statistics highlight the growing burden of interest payments on this debt, particularly to foreign bondholders.

1. National Debt Increase: The publicly held portion of the U. S. national debt surpassed $30.1 trillion by December 2025. The total federal debt, including what the government owes to itself, stands around $38 to $39 trillion.

2. Interest Payments to Foreign Bondholders: In 2025, the U. S. Treasury paid $282.4 billion in interest to foreign holders of U. S. debt, a 22% increase from $230.6 billion in 2024. Overall federal interest payments reached $970 billion, surpassing the defense budget.

3. Budget Impact: Interest payments are now the third-largest expense in the federal budget, following Social Security and Medicare. Nineteen cents of every federal tax dollar goes to interest payments, costing about $7,300 per household annually.

4. Top Foreign Holders: The primary foreign holders of U. S. debt are Japan ($1.2 trillion), the UK ($866 billion), and China ($683.5 billion). Notably, China has significantly reduced its U. S. Treasury holdings.

5. Future Projections: The Congressional Budget Office forecasts that interest payments could rise to $1.8 trillion by 2035, driven by ongoing borrowing and higher interest rates for new debt.

6. Fiscal Warnings: Government audits indicate that the U. S. remains on an unsustainable fiscal path. Increasing interest costs could consume a significant portion of the federal budget by 2029, hindering funding for critical programs.

The increasing national debt and the substantial interest payments to foreign bondholders pose a serious challenge to American taxpayers. Historical warnings from founding figures, like Thomas Jefferson and George Washington, emphasize the risks of public debt. The current trend suggests that without significant changes in federal spending practices, future generations will inherit a considerable financial burden, resulting in higher taxes and fewer resources for domestic needs. 

https://thefederalistpapers.org/americans-sent-282-billion-to-foreign-bondholders-last-year-as-national-debt-crosses-30-trillion/

Did the Sun’s “Terminator” Predict the Coming 2026 El Niño? New Research Says Yes

 Recent discussions among scientists have focused on a potential connection between solar activity and the El Niño phenomenon, particularly concerning an anticipated El Niño event in 2026. This summary details a prediction made by Robert Leamon and Scott McIntosh based on solar cycles and outlines the hypotheses surrounding this forecast.

1. Prediction Framework:

• Robert Leamon and Scott McIntosh identified a solar phenomenon called the “Terminator,” which occurs at the end of one solar cycle and the beginning of another.

• The prediction for the next El Niño, occurring in 2026, stems from the observation that El Niños typically follow these Terminator events after a lag of about five years.

2. Recent Research:

• A 2023 paper by Leamon indicated that the most recent Terminator occurred in December 2021, leading to expectations for the 2026 El Niño.

• This prediction is not purely random; it follows a recognizable pattern according to their research on the last several solar cycles.

3. Mechanisms of Influence:

• While the exact mechanism remains uncertain, researchers suggest that changes in solar activity influence Earth’s geomagnetic activity, which may then affect atmospheric currents and tropics, driving the conditions leading to an El Niño.

• Initially, it was thought that galactic cosmic rays were the critical link; however, more recent considerations suggest geomagnetic activity as a more plausible connection.

4. Historical Context:

• The concept of linking solar activity with weather patterns isn't new; previous scholars, such as Sir Gilbert Walker, sought similar correlations but encountered inconclusive results.

• The Terminator framework provides a more refined methodology for making predictions than earlier approaches, which relied primarily on sunspot counts.

5. Cautions and Critiques:

• Despite the predictive successes, several scientists remain hesitant to endorse the causal claims made by Leamon and McIntosh, calling attention to the uncertainties surrounding the individual links in this hypothesized causal chain.

• Critics argue that the five-year lag may not be universally applicable and caution against viewing the pattern as definitive proof of a solar influence on El Niño events.

The prediction of a significant El Niño in 2026, based on solar activity, highlights an intriguing area of climate research where relationships between solar cycles and ocean-atmosphere dynamics are explored. While promising, the mechanisms involved are still under investigation, and detailed testing remains necessary to validate these connections. This prediction adds a noteworthy angle in the ongoing discussions about climate patterns and the factors that influence them. 

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2026/05/17/did-the-suns-terminator-predict-the-coming-2026-el-nino-new-research-says-yes/