The French Revolution

 Was Not a People’s Uprising. It Was a Financial Collapse Masquerading as One.

By Staff

The popular narrative is a lie. Liberty versus tyranny, the people versus the crown, an angry mob storming a fortress on July 14, 1789 and changing the world forever. It makes for a clean story, which is precisely why it survived so long. But the real French Revolution was not born in the streets of Paris. It was born in ledger books, in Swiss banker loans, in volcanic ash from Iceland, in a trade deal with Britain that gutted French industry, and in a war fought for American colonists who never paid France back. The truth is far more unsettling: the revolution was a slow motion catastrophe decades in the making, and almost everyone in power saw it coming and did nothing.

The Rot Beneath the Glitter

On paper, 18th century France was the dominant power in Europe. The largest population in the West, roughly 28 million people, a massive military, a sprawling colonial empire, a rich agricultural base, and cultural influence that stretched across the continent. French was the language of diplomacy. Versailles was the envy of every court in Europe.

https://uspresscorps370.substack.com/p/the-french-revolution

The Fall of the G-Man

 James Comey and the Unraveling of Institutional Trust

By Staff

The arc is almost Shakespearean. A man who spent decades climbing the ladder of America’s most powerful law enforcement apparatus, who once stood before cameras as the embodiment of institutional integrity, now faces the very machinery he once commanded. James Comey, the seventh Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, sits at the center of multiple federal indictments. The charges range from false statements to Congress to, most explosively, threatening the life of the President of the United States through an Instagram post of seashells.

The whole thing reads like a dark satire of the post 2016 era, a period that has thoroughly dismantled whatever remained of the public’s faith in the institutions that govern them. But it is not satire. It is happening.

The First Shoe: September 2025 False Statements Indictment

The legal assault began in earnest on September 25, 2025, when a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia returned an indictment charging Comey with making false statements and obstruction.

https://uspresscorps.substack.com/p/the-fall-of-the-g-man

Omar Questions Mount

 FBI Adds Second Feeding Our Future Fugitive to Most Wanted List

By Staff

The sprawling quarter billion dollar fraud scandal that stole pandemic relief funds meant for hungry children continues to unravel, with another key suspect now on the FBI’s Most Wanted Fraudsters List hiding thousands of miles away in Somalia.

The Manhunt: Fahad Mohamed Nur

The FBI announced on July 8, 2026 that Fahad Mohamed Nur, age 42, has been added to the Bureau’s Most Wanted Fraudsters List. He is wanted on charges of wire fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering, and money laundering.

Nur hasn’t exactly been making himself easy to find. The naturalized U.S. citizen fled the country in January 2022, roughly one week after federal agents executed raids across Minnesota as part of the Feeding Our Future investigation. That’s four and a half years on the run.

https://uspresscorps.substack.com/p/omar-questions-mount

How the American Republic Became a Managerial State

 The transition of the United States from a republic founded on limited governmental powers to a so-called "managerial state" where government significantly controls the lives of its citizens. The author outlines key historical events and decisions that contributed to this shift.

1. Constitutional Foundations (1788): The original U. S. Constitution aimed to limit federal power, but the "Necessary and Proper Clause" allowed Congress to interpret its powers broadly. This opened the door for implied powers, leading to increased federal authority.

2. The Pendleton Act (1883): Following the assassination of President Garfield, this act established a permanent civil service and reduced presidential hirability of government employees. This shift meant that federal employees were insulated from direct political accountability.

3. Flexner Report (1910): This report transformed medical education and reinforced allopathic medicine, marginalizing alternative healthcare methods. Its legacy continues to influence healthcare policies and practices in favor of a centralized medical system.

4. Woodrow Wilson and the Federal Reserve (1913): Wilson emphasized a professional class of civil servants independent of political pressure. The establishment of the Federal Reserve marked a significant move toward economic management by an independent central authority.

5. Income Tax and the 16th Amendment (1913): This amendment enabled Congress to impose income taxes without apportioning them among the states, creating a progressive tax system that expanded the government's financial capability and reach.

6. JW Hampton v United States (1928): This case marked the end of strict nondelegation doctrine, allowing Congress to delegate legislative power to the executive branch which paved the way for an expansion of administrative authority.

7. The New Deal (Early 1930s): FDR's New Deal fundamentally altered the role of government in society, shifting it toward providing welfare and economic protection to citizens, fostering a dependency on federal assistance.

8. End of the Gold Standard: The suspension of the gold standard allowed the government greater freedom in printing money, enabling inflation and increasing national debt, distancing the economy from the original value system tied to gold.

9. Civil Rights Act (1964): This act imposed regulations on private behavior, expanding federal authority into the conduct of private citizens, thus challenging traditional limitations on governmental power and oversight.

10. Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1984): This Supreme Court decision granted federal agencies the power to interpret their own authority, effectively allowing bureaucracies to determine the limits of their influence without legislative checks.

11. Covid-19 Response: The government's handling of the Covid-19 pandemic exemplified the extent of administrative power, imposing regulations that drastically restricted civil liberties and overwhelming personal autonomy in favor of public health directives.

The path to America's current managerial state was shaped by critical legislative changes, judicial rulings, and societal shifts. Initially designed as a republic with limited government powers, the U. S. Constitution allowed the rise of a centralized administrative framework that today governs extensive aspects of daily life. The evolution from a republic to a planned and regulated society has significantly altered the relationship between citizens and their government, shifting individual duties and responsibilities toward a dependency on government solutions. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/how-the-american-republic-became-a-managerial-state/

New revelations raise questions whether Jack Smith lied to Congress about spying on lawmakers

Recent documents suggest that Special Counsel Jack Smith may have misled Congress regarding his team's access to private text messages of lawmakers during an investigation into alleged 2020 election interference by Donald Trump. This revelation has raised questions about the legality and ethics of his actions.

1. Testimony Under Scrutiny: In December, Jack Smith testified before Congress that his team had not accessed the content of lawmakers’ messages. He confirmed that the "toll records" requested did not include the content of communications. However, new evidence shows his team accessed private text messages of at least 44 lawmakers, potentially contradicting his statements.

2. Legal Implications: Under federal law, lying to Congress is a criminal offense, punishable by up to five years in prison. Lawmakers, particularly Republican senators, are calling for an investigation into whether Smith’s previous testimony constituted a false statement. Senator Eric Schmitt expressed that Smith’s actions potentially amounted to perjury.

3. Constitutional Protections: The Senate Judiciary Committee noted that communications from lawmakers regarding their official duties are protected under the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause, which aims to shield them from executive scrutiny. Bypassing established procedures to access these messages raises concerns about the violations of these constitutional rights.

4. Previous Investigations: Smith’s extensive investigation focused on Trump’s actions surrounding the 2020 election and the January 6 Capitol riot. This included issuing nearly 200 subpoenas and seeking records from more than 400 Republican figures and organizations. Critics argue that the investigation’s scope was overly broad and politically motivated.

5. Responses from Legal Authorities: Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche indicated openness to investigating whether Smith misled Congress. Smith has faced accusations that his investigation, nicknamed "Arctic Frost," was part of a larger effort to undermine Trump and his allies.

6. Criticism from Lawmakers: Senator Chuck Grassley described the actions of Smith and the FBI as potentially worse than Watergate, asserting that there were serious abuses and unconstitutional breaches involved in the investigations targeting Trump and Republicans.

7. Ongoing Fallout: This controversy continues to unfold, as additional documents related to Smith’s investigations suggest widespread targeting of GOP officials. Republican leaders are adamant about pursuing accountability for what they perceive as politically motivated actions by Smith and the Justice Department.

The allegations against Jack Smith present significant legal and ethical questions regarding his conduct in the Trump investigation. As lawmakers call for further investigation into potential false statements made to Congress, the implications of these actions will likely continue to affect the political landscape as the 2024 election approaches. The scrutiny on Smith’s methods and the protection of legislative communications emphasizes the ongoing tensions between federal authorities and elected officials. 

https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/lawmakers-accuse-jack-smith-lying-congress-call-federal-probe 

How Socialism Captured the West Coast

Cities like Seattle, Portland, and Los Angeles are witnessing a surge in socialist political activity. Traditional Democratic values have shifted towards more radical approaches, driven by economic struggles and demographic changes. The article explores how this shift has occurred and its implications for the future.

1. Political Landscape Shifts: Socialist candidates have made significant political gains on the West Coast. Seattle and Portland are experiencing notable successes, and Los Angeles might see similar shifts, marking a political battle for the region.

2. Historical Context: The West Coast has a history of radical political movements, such as the Wobblies and Upton Sinclair's campaigns. This tradition appears to be revitalizing amid current economic challenges.

3. Economic Deterioration: Major West Coast cities suffer from high office vacancy rates and economic instability. Many tech companies have downsized or relocated, contributing to local job losses and rising unemployment rates.

4. Demographic Changes: A younger, educated, and childless demographic in these cities is increasingly turning towards socialism. Economic anxiety among recent graduates, who often struggle with underemployment, is driving young voters toward the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA).

5. Impact on Employment and Business: Corporate headquarters are leaving California for states with better conditions for business. Companies, including big names like Starbucks and Amazon, are shifting investments to avoid high taxes and regulatory burdens.

6. Socialist Movements: The increasing presence of socialist policies is tied to changes in voter demographics. This trend is particularly strong in urban areas, influenced by younger voters who are becoming disillusioned with traditional political options.

7. Urban vs. Suburb Dynamics: Socialist candidates typically perform well in densely populated urban areas while struggling in more suburban or homeowner-dominated regions. The geographic divide significantly affects electoral outcomes.

8. Challenges Ahead: While socialist movements are growing, translating urban gains to state-level power will be a tougher battle. Key political contests are anticipated, particularly in California, where economic conditions are precarious.

9. Potential Pushback: Wealthy individuals and businesses are starting to resist socialist proposals. This pushback is essential, as California relies heavily on high-income earners for tax revenue but faces risks with the exodus of wealth.

The economic struggles of West Coast cities are fueling a resurgence of socialism, attracting young voters disillusioned by job opportunities. As radical policies gain traction, the political landscape is set for significant changes. The future of these movements remains uncertain, especially as wealthy residents and businesses react against growing socialist sentiment. Without a robust counter-response, the region may be on a path reminiscent of historical socialist surges, raising concerns for free markets and private property rights. 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/west-coast-socialism-political-candidates-elections 

What to Expect From Trump’s Prime-Time Address

 On July 16, 2026, President Donald Trump is set to deliver a prime-time address to the nation. This speech is anticipated to focus on key issues such as Iran and election reform, particularly advocating for the SAVE America Act. This summary outlines the main expectations and implications surrounding his address.

1. Purpose of the Address: Trump aims to update the public on the situation in Iran and push for election reform, using the prime-time slot to communicate his message directly and without interruption.

2. Focus on the SAVE America Act: The SAVE Act, which includes voter ID and proof of citizenship provisions, is a top priority for Trump. He is expected to stress the significance of this act in ensuring election integrity.

3. Impact on Government Funding and Midterm Elections: There are concerns that elements of the voter integrity measures may be attached to a defense spending package through an approach termed Reconciliation 3.0, leading to discussions of a potential partial government shutdown prior to the November midterms.

4. Political Risks for Both Parties: Republicans face pressure to support the SAVE Act to avoid a government shutdown, while Democrats risk being depicted as opposed to popular election integrity reforms. Public opinion shows strong support for measures like photo ID requirements.

Trump's address presents both opportunities and challenges for political parties as they navigate the implications of the SAVE America Act. It’s evident that the legislation has substantial public backing, putting both Republicans and Democrats in a difficult position regarding its passage and the upcoming midterm elections. How Trump frames this issue during his address could significantly affect both party strategies moving forward. 

https://www.libertynation.com/what-to-expect-from-trump-s-primetime-address/