The Next Indictment Should Be Against Greg Folkers

 The Department of Justice has evidence against Greg Folkers, a key advisor to Dr. Anthony Fauci, for his involvement in the censorship and coverup regarding the origins of Covid-19.

• Greg Folkers served as Chief of Staff at NIAID and was crucial in managing a $6 billion budget while allegedly participating in censorship tactics.

• In January 2020, he informed Fauci about funding for gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, warning it could be related to Covid-19's origin.

• Instead of publicly addressing the potential lab leak, Folkers and Fauci, along with Dr. Morens, chose to suppress this information.

• They produced the "Proximal Origin" article to dismiss lab leak theories while being aware that several virologists believed in its likelihood.

• Folkers and Morens also conspired to evade FOIA requests through methods like misspelling key terms and deleting emails.

• The charges against Morens include conspiracy and record falsification, stemming from evidence of similar actions by Folkers.

Folkers played a vital role in the Covid-19 response and coverup, and further accountability for other officials involved is anticipated as investigations continue. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-next-indictment-should-be-against-greg-folkers/

Trump’s DOJ Forcing Mexican President to Choose Between Protecting Political Party or Fighting Cartels

 Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum is facing a significant dilemma as the U. S. government pressures her to combat drug cartels while protecting her political party, which has ties to these criminal organizations.

• The U. S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has unsealed an indictment against Sinaloa’s Governor Ruben Rocha Moya and others for allegedly collaborating with the Sinaloa Cartel in exchange for bribes.

• This is the first time a sitting Mexican governor has faced such charges, highlighting the accusation that the ruling MORENA party is connected to drug cartels for political gain.

• The indictment aligns with claims made by President Trump about Mexico’s corruption relating to drug cartels, asserting that the government has not adequately fought these groups.

• Following the indictment, the MORENA party issued a statement supporting Rocha Moya, indicating an intention to protect its political interests over confronting criminal activity directly.

• Sheinbaum's administration has claimed collaboration with the U. S. to combat drug trafficking but refuses to allow American agents or troops in Mexico.

• The Mexican Attorney General's Office has received the indictment but expressed skepticism about the evidence provided by the U. S. and indicated possible obstruction of the case.

• Sheinbaum is now under pressure to either cooperate with U. S. demands to combat the cartels, which could lead to sanctions, or to continue protecting her political allies amid growing scrutiny from both the U. S. and domestic critics.

President Sheinbaum's actions in response to the U. S. pressure and the indictment could shape both her political future and the ongoing fight against drug cartels in Mexico. The situation is evolving, with significant implications for Mexican governance and U. S.-Mexico relations. 

https://www.breitbart.com/border/2026/04/30/trumps-doj-forcing-mexican-president-to-choose-between-protecting-political-party-or-fighting-cartels/

Biden-Appointed Judge Orders Release of Dominican Illegal Alien Wanted for Murder by Interpol Red Notice Fugitive Now Roaming Free After ICE Arrest!

A recent legal ruling has raised concerns regarding public safety after a U. S. federal judge ordered the release of a Dominican illegal immigrant, Bryan Rafael Gomez. He is wanted for murder in his home country and had previously been detained by U. S. authorities.

• Background: Bryan Rafael Gomez, a Dominican national, was arrested by ICE Boston on April 4, 2026, after being taken into custody for domestic abuse in Massachusetts. A background check revealed that he had a homicide warrant issued by Dominican authorities in 2023.

• Judicial Ruling: U. S. District Judge Melissa DuBose, appointed during the Biden administration, ruled on April 28, 2026, that Gomez was unlawfully detained and ordered his release, despite ICE's arguments that he should be held due to the active international arrest warrant for murder.

• Deportation Order: An immigration judge had already issued a deportation order against Gomez prior to the ruling by Judge DuBose. Following her decision, ICE reported that they are unable to rearrest him due to the judge's order.

• Public Safety Concerns: The release of Gomez has alarmed officials, particularly because he is a fugitive wanted for serious crimes. This event highlights ongoing debates surrounding immigration policy and the judiciary's role in these matters.

• Government Response: The U. S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) criticized the ruling, calling it an example of an activist judge undermining efforts to remove criminal illegal aliens from the nation.

The decision to release Bryan Rafael Gomez has caused controversy, raising questions about the balance between judicial authority and public safety concerns regarding illegal immigrants with serious criminal backgrounds. The incident serves to underscore ongoing tensions in U. S. immigration policy and the related judicial processes that influence it. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/04/biden-appointed-judge-orders-release-dominican-illegal-alien/ 

Two largest teacher unions spent over $1B on on political activity and advocacy since 2015

Since 2015, the two largest teacher unions in the United States, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the National Education Association (NEA), have spent over $1 billion on political activities as reported by Defending Education. This large sum has raised concerns regarding how these unions influence political agendas at various levels.

• Total Spending: The combined political spending of the AFT and NEA amounts to over $1 billion, with $669 million from federal sources and $336 million from state and local levels.

• Funding Sources: The money used for political activities comes from member dues, political action committee (PAC) contributions, and Committee on Political Education (COPE) funds. These are often collected separately from regular dues.

• Political Influence: The unions allocate funds to support political campaigns, nonprofit advocacy groups, school board elections, and to oppose school choice legislation. For instance, they spent:

• $7.2 million against school choice in Kentucky

• $4.3 million in Nebraska

• More than $4.2 million in Maine

• Local Impact: At the local level, unions have spent over $135.8 million, which often influences local educational policies and elections.

• User of Funds: The report notes that many public school districts do not refund union dues, which are deducted from teachers' salaries. This raises concerns about taxpayer dollars being used for union political activity.

• Participation in Broader Movements: Teacher unions also engage in various political and social movements, sometimes involving students in demonstrations for causes such as immigration reform, which leads to concerns about the appropriateness of using students in these contexts.

The report highlights the extensive financial and political power of teacher unions in the U. S. and raises questions about the implications of their spending and influence on education policy and local governance. The unions have a significant role beyond traditional labor issues, shaping the next generation of political allies. 

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/teacher-unions-spent-over-1b-political-causes-2015 

2 Shootings in 4 Days Near Maine Somali Mosque

 Two shootings occurred within four days near a Somali mosque and a refugee services center in Lewiston, Maine. The area has seen an increase in gun violence.

• The Lewiston Police Department released surveillance footage showing a young black male gunman firing at nearby cars and the Maine Immigrant and Refugee Services building.

• Witnesses indicated that the shootings highlight growing concerns about safety in the community.

• Lewiston has a significant Somali Muslim presence, which has sparked discussions about the impact of immigrants in the area.

• Mayor Carl Sheline defended the contributions of Somali immigrants, stating they play a vital role in local business and economic growth.

• Sheline described criticisms claiming Somali immigrants contribute nothing to society as shameful and false.

The recent shootings underscore ongoing tensions surrounding immigration and safety in Lewiston, with local leaders advocating for the contributions of the Somali community amidst rising violence.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/2-shootings-in-4-days-near-maine-somali-mosque/

The Supreme Court Strikes a Blow for Voting Rights Sanity

 The Supreme Court delivered a significant ruling in the case of Louisiana v. Callais, addressing the complexities of racial districting and voting rights under the Voting Rights Act (VRA). The 6–3 decision resolves a long-standing conflict regarding race-based electoral maps.

• The Court's majority decision, led by Justice Samuel Alito, is seen as a victory for those opposing the division of America into racially defined political groups.

• Previously, the Court's interpretation of Section 2 of the VRA resulted in confusion regarding the balance between enforcing voting rights and preventing racial discrimination in districting.

• The ruling emphasizes that the VRA was enacted to uphold the Fifteenth Amendment, which prohibits voting rights violations based on race, but only when motivated by intentional discrimination.

• The majority clarified that Section 2 cannot enforce the Fifteenth Amendment solely by showing that racial groups are underrepresented in electoral maps.

• The Court revised the established criteria for proving violations under Section 2, focusing on intentional discrimination rather than disparate impacts.

• The decision updates the previous four-part test from Thornburg v. Gingles, imposing new requirements, including that plaintiffs must present a fair map that does not rely on racial basis.

• It encourages consideration of various legitimate priorities in map-making, thereby reducing the risks of partisan disputes masked as racial issues.

The Callais ruling is framed as a step toward greater legal consistency and ensuring the equal protection of all Americans. By redefining the application of the VRA, the Court aims to eliminate confusion in districting law while safeguarding voting rights against manipulation. Critics of the ruling misunderstand its aim, which emphasizes fair legal principles over merely affirming the status of chosen race-based policies. 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/supreme-court-louisiana-v-callais-voting-rights-race

We Are Living in the Fourth American Republic

 The original American republic established in the late 18th century no longer exists. It argues that the constitutional order of the founding fathers has been fundamentally altered through a series of revolutions and changes in governance over the years, culminating in what the author describes as the Fourth American Republic.

• Decline of the Original Constitution: The author asserts that many conservatives mistakenly believe that the original constitution is still relevant today. This idea is contrasted with the claim that the constitution as it was understood a century ago has been effectively abandoned.

• Changing Interpretations: It is stated that the meaning of the U. S. constitution has shifted dramatically over time. The current understanding, dictated by modern federal judges, bears little resemblance to the interpretation of the constitution in the early 1800s.

• Historical Revolutions: The essay outlines several revolutions that have transformed the U. S. governance structure:

1. Counterrevolution against the Articles of Confederation: Early American leaders centralized power against the decentralized system favored during the Revolutionary War.

2. Civil War's Effects: The Civil War established a principle of unity that negated the ability of states to secede, fundamentally changing the relationship between the federal government and states.

3. Progressive Era Changes: New policies established a stronger central government, including the introduction of the federal income tax and the establishment of the Federal Reserve.

4. New Deal Evolution: This era marked the rise of the administrative state, where the New Deal’s legislation expanded federal reach deeper into American life.

• Lack of Self-Recognition: The author highlights a tendency among Americans to remain unaware of these changes, often clinging to nostalgic beliefs about the founding principles of the nation.

• Modern Federal Power: Today, the author claims that there is no true member-state sovereignty and that checks and balances, originally envisioned by the founders, have been effectively dismantled.

• Four Republics Concept: The author argues that the United States has undergone four distinct republics:

1. First Republic (1776-1788)

2. Second Republic (1787-1865)

3. Third Republic (1865-1910)

4. Fourth Republic (1937-present)

The piece emphasizes that the 'American experiment' as conceived by the founders is largely an illusion today. The writer stresses that the current system operates under a massive federal administrative state that has redefined the relationship between citizens and the government. Many who claim to support the original constitution are living in an imagined past rather than confronting the realities of the present-day governance structure. The notion that the constitutional order from the founding years can or should be preserved is characterized as unrealistic given the profound changes that have taken place. 

https://mises.org/mises-wire/we-are-living-fourth-american-republic