Fauci Joined a Foreign Vaccine Institute Months After Leaving Government. His Former Agency Then Funded Research Inside It.

 This report discusses Anthony Fauci's post-government role and the financial connections between his advisory position at an Italian vaccine institute and research funded by his former agency, the NIH.

1. Fauci's New Role: Shortly after leaving his position as Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) in December 2022, Fauci became an informal strategic advisor for the Fondazione Biotecnopolo di Siena, an institute focused on vaccines and pandemic preparedness.

2. Government Backing: The Biotecnopolo was established under Italian law with support from several government ministries, indicating strong governmental ties and funding allocated towards pandemic preparedness.

3. NIAID Funding: Within months of Fauci joining the institute, NIAID announced a new funding initiative called ReVAMPP, which focused on developing vaccines and monoclonal antibodies for potential pandemics. The institute led by Fauci's associate Rino Rappuoli received a significant portion of this funding.

4. Research Collaboration: Rappuoli, who has collaborated with Fauci for years, was involved as a principal investigator in the NIAID-funded research, which focused on creating vaccines and treatments for various pathogens.

5. Evidence of Financial Links: Biotecnopolo's procurement records reveal that they recorded purchases tied to the NIH-funded ReVAMPP project, providing clear evidence of ongoing connections between Fauci and the funded research.

The relationship between Fauci's role at the Biotecnopolo and the substantial NIH funding showcases a significant overlap between his post-government work and the funding mechanisms he managed for nearly four decades.

https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/exclusive-fauci-joined-a-foreign?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=3382126&post_id=210412771&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Document Dump Reveals More Deep State Treachery Aimed at Trump

 Recent declassified documents have shed light on alleged internal sabotage against President Trump during his administration. These documents reveal multiple investigations led by the FBI, which some accuse of being politically motivated attempts to undermine Trump's presidency.

1. Investigations During Trump's Presidency:

President Trump faced numerous allegations of wrongdoing, which reportedly consumed much of his time in office.

Internal sabotage began with the FBI's "Crossfire Hurricane" operation in July 2016, suggesting Trump colluded with Russia.

2. May 2017 Investigation into Jeff Sessions:

The FBI opened a criminal investigation into Attorney General Jeff Sessions after receiving a letter from two Democratic senators.

The investigation, named “March Toll,” addressed Sessions’ testimony about interactions with Russia, even though he accurately stated he had not discussed campaign matters with Russian officials.

Ultimately, the investigation concluded without charges nearly two years later, yet Sessions' reputation suffered significantly.

3. Investigation into President Trump:

A week after Trump fired former FBI Director James Comey, investigations into Trump were initiated under the name “Oxferd Comma.”

The investigation aimed to determine whether Trump acted as a Russian agent during Comey’s dismissal. However, it was based on allegations from a discredited dossier, with no factual basis.

4. Continued Allegations Post-Mueller Report:

After the Mueller report, the FBI continued to label Republicans as Russian collaborators to deflect attention from issues surrounding the Biden family.

A covert operation titled “Round River” was launched, falsely suggesting Russian interference in U.S. politics, with certain Republican lawmakers named as conduits of disinformation.

53 informants reported derogatory information about Hunter Biden, highlighting potential corruption that went unaddressed.

5. Implications of the Findings:

The revelations suggest that the FBI and DOJ were more entrenched in politicized actions against Trump than previously understood.

This undermined Trump’s presidency and his reelection campaign, as his administration was continuously besieged by these targeted investigations.

The documents unveiled indicate a troubling pattern of political maneuvering by federal agencies against Trump's administration. It implies that the previously perceived allegations and the resulting investigations were not only unwarranted but were intended to discredit Trump and his associates, impacting the governance and electoral processes during his time in office. Many believe that these actions demonstrate an entrenched corruption within the justice system that persists even today. 

https://www.declassified.live/p/document-dump-reveals-more-deep-state

Total Freedom vs Total Slavery And The Race For AI Supremacy

 Brandon Smith explores the implications of artificial intelligence (AI) on society, highlighting both its potential benefits and future risks. The article addresses the promises of a labor-free utopia versus the dangers of a surveillance state, questioning whether AI will lead to increased freedom or deeper control over the populace.

Disappointment with AI's Current Impact

Current AI applications yield limited benefits, mainly aiding data organization and research efficiency.

Relying on AI can lead to laziness in critical thinking and information processing, potentially diminishing knowledge over time.

The Promises of a Labor-Free Utopia

Some technologists, including Elon Musk, envision a future where AI and robots eliminate the need for human labor, supposedly resulting in wealth and time abundance.

A labor-free world has been promised before, often as a means to encourage reliance on government systems, which can limit personal freedoms.

Historical trends show that industrial revolutions often lead to increased work hours and demands, rather than the freedom from labor that is promised.

Energy Requirements for AI Advancement

The vision of an AI-driven utopia depends on substantial energy resources, which are currently inadequate to support widespread AI implementations.

The infrastructure for energy delivery is not equipped to handle the exponential increases in demand that large-scale AI and robotics would generate.

The Risk of a Dystopian Future

The concern exists that AI technology could empower elites, leading to greater population control through surveillance and data collection.

Institutions like the World Economic Forum and International Monetary Fund utilize AI for economic digitization and monitoring, which raises ethical concerns about privacy and trust.

The Information Economy Fallacy

The concept of an "information economy" relies on using data and algorithms for marketing but often misses understanding human behavior accurately.

Relying too heavily on predictive algorithms for decision-making could lead to instability in the economy, as the complex nature of human interactions is difficult to predict.

Potential for Misuse of AI

There is a risk that AI will be used primarily for authoritarian purposes rather than beneficial societal advancements.

A significant concern is the potential suppression of the populace via improved surveillance capabilities, which could lead to increased control by those in power.

The discourse surrounding AI illustrates competing visions: one of freedom and abundance, the other of control and oppression. As technological advances continue, it is critical to recognize and address the energy requirements and potential societal impacts. Without proper oversight and ethical frameworks, the proliferation of AI could ultimately lead to more harm than good. The reality appears to suggest that while AI has potential, its current trajectory may lean more towards a surveillance state rather than a utopian society. For real change, public understanding and engagement will be key factors in shaping the future of AI and its role in our lives. 

https://alt-market.us/total-freedom-vs-total-slavery-and-the-race-for-ai-supremacy/

Georgia executives handed light sentence for role in historic $380M Ponzi scheme: ‘I was a coward’

 Two executives from Drive Planning, a financial company involved in the largest Ponzi scheme in Georgia, have received light prison sentences for defrauding over 2,000 investors out of $380 million. The scheme ran from 2020 to 2024, targeting investors with false promises.

Executives Involved: David Bradford (Chief Operating Officer) and Julie Edwards (Chief Administrative Officer) conspired with CEO Todd Burkholter in the fraudulent scheme.

Light Sentences: Bradford was sentenced to four years in prison, and Edwards to two years, despite the severe harm caused to many victims, some of whom lost their life savings.

Bradford's Admission: Throughout the sentencing, Bradford expressed remorse, calling himself a “coward” for participating in the fraud. He acknowledged the pain inflicted on trustful investors, including people from his community.

Details of the Scheme: The fraudulent operations included investment opportunities such as the "Cash Out Real Estate Fund," which promised passive income and guaranteed returns that were never delivered.

Financial Gains: The executives used investor funds for their luxurious lifestyles, including yachts and expensive properties.

Restitution Orders: Bradford has been ordered to pay $4.2 million in restitution related to the scheme.

Further Proceedings: Burkholter is set to be sentenced later, having pleaded guilty to wire fraud and facing a recommended sentence of 17.5 years in prison.

The light sentences for Bradford and Edwards have raised concerns about accountability in financial crimes, especially given their impact on vulnerable investors. As Burkholter awaits sentencing, the ramifications of their fraudulent actions continue to affect many lives. 

https://nypost.com/2026/08/14/us-news/georgia-executives-david-bradford-julie-edwards-sentenced-in-380m-ponzi-scheme/

Two federal agencies routed taxpayer dollars to terror-linked charities, new reports find

 Recent reports reveal that two U.S. federal agencies allocated approximately $2 billion in taxpayer funds to charities associated with terrorism. This includes the State Department and the Health and Human Services Department (HHS), raising concerns about the vetting processes in place to prevent funding from reaching such groups.

1. Funding to World Vision

The State Department collaborated with World Vision to distribute around $2 billion in global health aid. World Vision's Gaza affiliate faced scrutiny after its operations manager was convicted of funneling $50 million to Hamas in 2022.

2. HHS and Terror-Linked Organizations

HHS awarded nearly $80 million to 14 organizations connected to terrorism and extremism, including grants to the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and others accused of having links to terrorist activities.

CAIR’s California chapter received $42.2 million aimed at assisting Afghan refugees, despite its controversial history involving terrorist affiliations.

3. Background on CAIR

CAIR has faced accusations of having ties to Hamas, and several of its board members have been indicted on terrorism-related charges. The organization was also labeled as an “unindicted co-conspirator” in a federal case involving financial support to Hamas.

CAIR maintains that all funding is properly accounted for and utilized for stated purposes.

4. Other Recipients of HHS Funding

Other organizations funded include the Islamic Circle of North America's relief wing, which received $10.6 million, and the Muslim American Society, which received $90,000, despite its connections to the Muslim Brotherhood.

A mosque linked to housing two 9/11 hijackers also received $340,000 for promoting COVID-19 vaccinations.

5. Legislative and Agency Findings

Past investigations into World Vision highlighted concerns over its connections to sanctioned organizations like the Islamic Relief Agency, which has a history of supporting terrorism.

Critics of the funding argue that the administration's decisions endanger vulnerable populations, suggesting it creates pathways for radicalization.

6. Government Responses

The State Department defended its partnerships, denying any accusations of misdirecting U.S. foreign aid to terrorist organizations and emphasizing strict accountability measures.

A senior official from the Trump administration expressed skepticism about the choice to fund World Vision, labeling it as compromised by connections to radical ideologies.

The allocation of significant taxpayer dollars to organizations with suspected ties to terrorism has led to serious concerns regarding federal oversight and accountability. The funding decisions made by the State Department and HHS are under scrutiny, with implications for both national security and the welfare of vulnerable populations receiving aid. 

https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/two-federal-agencies-routed-taxpayer-dollars-terror-linked-charities?utm_source=justthenews.com&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=external-news-aggregators

Multiple Noncitizens Charged For Allegedly Voting In 2024 Election In Michigan

 In Michigan, Attorney General Dana Nessel has announced that her office has charged multiple individuals for voting-related offenses in the November 2024 election. These include five noncitizens and one U.S. citizen involved in registering a noncitizen to vote.

Five noncitizens have been charged with offenses related to voting in the 2024 election. Their status includes lawful permanent residents and a resident from the United Kingdom, none of whom are U.S. citizens.

The charges include making false statements on absentee ballots, fraudulent registration, election law forgery, perjury, and attempting to vote illegally. The potential penalties for these actions range from 90 days in jail to several years in prison.

Throughout 2025, the Michigan Department of State reported 16 cases of suspected noncitizen voting to the Attorney General’s office. An additional 22 cases were referred in 2026 involving voting from 2009 to 2025.

Of the total of 38 cases reviewed, six resulted in criminal charges, ten were closed without charges, and 22 remain under investigation.

All voter registrations linked to the identified noncitizen voters have been canceled.

Attorney General Nessel emphasized the importance of maintaining election integrity and prosecuting those who violate voting laws. She noted the challenges in some cases due to limited access to federal citizenship records.

The Michigan Attorney General’s office is actively addressing suspected noncitizen voting to uphold the integrity of elections. The ongoing reviews and investigations aim to ensure that all voting practices comply with legal standards. 

https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/five-noncitizens-charged-for-allegedly-voting-in-2024-election-in-michigan-cmc/

Victor Davis Hanson Points to Numerous Examples of Democrats Doing EXACTLY What They Accuse Trump of Doing

 Victor Davis Hanson, a conservative historian, argues that Democrats frequently accuse Donald Trump of misconduct while engaging in the same behaviors themselves. He provides various examples to highlight this hypocrisy.

1. Charges Against Trump's Attorney General:

Democrats opposed Todd Blanche’s appointment as attorney general, claiming his connection to Trump was a conflict of interest. Hanson points out that similar appointments have occurred in the past, such as Robert F. Kennedy under JFK and Eric Holder under Obama.

2. Lawfare Allegations:

Democrats express concerns over state prosecutors potentially indicting Anthony Fauci, using legal strategies popularized by Democrats like Letitia James and Alvin Bragg against Trump.

3. IRS Bias Claims:

Accusations that Trump has misused the IRS come from a party that once faced backlash for Lois Lerner's actions, which involved scrutinizing conservative groups. This scrutiny was notably heightened during Obama’s campaign.

4. Election Integrity Issues:

Democrats criticize Trump for questioning the 2020 election results, despite their own history of challenging election outcomes, such as Al Gore's contested recount in Florida that ultimately favored George W. Bush.

5. Media’s Role in Highlighting Hypocrisy:

Hanson suggests that if the media were more objective, they would criticize Democrats for these double standards instead of enabling their narratives.

Hanson’s analysis claims that Democrats often accuse Trump of behavior they have historically exhibited themselves. This trend, he argues, demonstrates a consistent double standard, which is largely overlooked by mainstream media. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/08/victor-davis-hanson-points-numerous-examples-democrats-doing/