Mollie Hemingway Reveals EXPLOSIVE Details About How Liberals on SCOTUS Put Lives of Conservative Justices in Danger

 Mollie Hemingway, a conservative analyst, discussed significant revelations regarding tensions within the Supreme Court following the leak of the Dobbs decision, which aimed to overturn Roe v. Wade. This discussion highlights the dynamics among justices and the danger faced by conservative members.

1. Conflict Among Justices:

Hemingway recounts her findings from a new book that claims Justice Kagan confronted Justice Breyer after the Dobbs decision was leaked. This incident reflects a broader atmosphere of conflict on the Court.

2. Timelines and Reactions:

Justice Alito had prepared his opinion on overturning Roe as early as February. The liberal justices reportedly delayed their dissent out of spite. The leak in May triggered widespread protests, raising safety concerns for conservative justices.

3. Threats Against Conservative Justices:

Following the leak, protests escalated, targeting the homes of the conservative justices, leading to security concerns. One man was arrested for a plot to assassinate Justice Kavanaugh as an extreme manifestation of these threats.

4. Requests for Expedited Dissent:

The conservative justices requested that their liberal counterparts expedite their dissent to lessen public unrest. Hemingway notes that the liberal justices were unresponsive, ignoring the potential risks to their colleagues.

5. Safety Realities for Justices:

The conservative justices had to adopt security measures, including wearing bulletproof vests. The potential risk to their lives was heightened, as a change in the Court's makeup could have reversed the Roe decision if a justice were harmed.

6. Critique of Liberal Justices:

Hemingway's comments paint the liberal justices as callous, suggesting their lack of empathy put their colleagues in danger during a tumultuous time following the leak.

Mollie Hemingway's insights bring to light the complexities and dangers within the Supreme Court after the Roe v. Wade decision was leaked. The internal conflicts and external pressures have raised significant concerns about the safety and functioning of the Court, making it clear that the political environment surrounding the justices is fraught with tension and peril.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/04/mollie-hemingway-reveals-explosive-details-about-how-liberals/

Boosted By Out-Of-State Dark Money, Virginia Passes Dems’ Deceptive Gerrymandering Scheme

 Recent developments in Virginia have raised concerns about a new constitutional amendment that could lead to significant changes in the state's congressional map. The amendment, backed by Democrats, has drawn attention due to the large amounts of out-of-state funding it received.

• A constitutional amendment in Virginia has passed that allows the Democratic-controlled General Assembly to redraw congressional maps.

• Preliminary results show the amendment passed by 2.8 points, with over 3 million ballots cast.

• The amendment could enable a shift from a current map of six Democrats and five Republicans to one with 10 Democrats and one Republican, potentially disenfranchising many rural voters.

• The campaign for the amendment was fueled by over $64 million, primarily from outside Virginia, including significant contributions from groups like House Majority Forward and the Fairness Project.

• In contrast, the opposition group, Virginians for Fair Maps, received substantially less funding, totaling around $21.8 million.

• The legality of the amendment and its implications may ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court of Virginia, as the court has postponed ruling on its lawfulness until after the referendum.

The passing of this amendment highlights the contentious issue of gerrymandering in Virginia, showing how external funding can influence local elections. The future of the newly drawn congressional maps now rests with the state's Supreme Court, raising questions about fairness and representation in the electoral process. 

https://thefederalist.com/2026/04/21/boosted-by-out-of-state-dark-money-virginia-passes-dems-deceptive-gerrymandering-scheme/

Secret ‘Witness 2’ was anti-Trump intel officer pushing Russiagate, Ukraine impeachment

 The identity and implications of "Witness 2," revealed to be Gavin Wilde, an anti-Trump intelligence officer involved in the 2019 Ukraine impeachment proceedings. This witness played a significant role in supporting allegations against former President Donald Trump, connecting him to both the Russiagate investigation and subsequent claims related to Ukraine.

1. Identity of Witness 2:

• The unnamed "Witness 2" in the Ukraine impeachment documents is confirmed to be Gavin Wilde.

• Wilde previously worked with the National Security Agency (NSA) and the National Security Council (NSC).

2. Involvement in Impeachment:

• His claims were integral to the whistleblower complaint that accused Trump of pressuring Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden's family.

• Witness 2 provided critical information that prompted the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) to advance the whistleblower's allegations.

3. Connection to Anti-Trump Sentiment:

• Wilde has publicly expressed anti-Trump views and has linked Trump’s actions to Russian propaganda.

• His prior affiliations with prominent anti-Trump figures, such as Peter Strzok, come to light, raising questions about his objectivity.

4. Impact of Discredited Intelligence Assessments:

• Wilde participated in the controversial January 2017 intelligence assessment alleging Russian interference in the 2016 elections, which has since been criticized for using flawed intelligence.

• His cooperation with the whistleblower was influenced by what he described as a moral obligation to the truth and democracy.

5. Key Testimonies and Memos:

• Declassified memos from Atkinson reveal that Witness 2 helped shape the narrative around the whistleblower complaint.

• Despite being a significant source, Witness 2 had not directly read the transcript of the Trump-Zelensky call, which undermines claims about his statements being based on firsthand knowledge.

6. Perspectives on the Trump-Zelensky Call:

• Witness 2 claimed to interpret the call as a solicitation for help in the upcoming election, yet he admitted there was no explicit mention of such a quid pro quo.

• His conclusions seem to rely on personal inferences rather than factual evidence from the transcript.

7. Further Links and Collaborations:

• Wilde is currently associated with organizations that have a history of anti-Trump rhetoric and continues to contribute to discussions on Ukraine and Russian interference.

• He and Ciaramella, another key figure in the whistleblower complaint, share collaborations on research and commentary within think tank circles.

The revelation of Gavin Wilde as "Witness 2" sheds light on the significant yet controversial role of certain individuals in the Ukraine impeachment proceedings against Trump. His connections to previous intelligence assessments and the anti-Trump narrative raise questions about bias in the inquiries that may have impacted significant political events. The complexity of witness testimonies and motivations underscores the contentious nature of the investigations surrounding Trump’s presidency and America's foreign policy.

https://justthenews.com/accountability/whistleblowers/ided-witness-2-helped-ukraine-whistleblower-worked-strzok-wrote-2016

News roundup:

 Patel responds to Atlantic report, says he’s ‘never been intoxicated on the job’

Hegseth ends mandatory flu vaccine for US military, says shot is now optional

Trump gives Iran days to end power struggle, return to peace talks

Dems’ Virginia gamble pays off in redistricting wars

Scoop: Trump mulls Jones Act waiver extension to lessen Iran War oil shock

Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick resigns from Congress

Kaine: Virginia Stood Up to Trump’s Tyranny

Security Experts Warn of Scammers Promising Safe Passage Through Strait of Hormuz

Cato Claims Migrants Pay More Taxes than Average Americans

Minnesota allows ‘happy hour’ in nursing homes under new law easing alcohol restrictions

US military launches first-ever autonomous warfare command to deploy unmanned systems across Latin America

Appeals court rules ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ can stay open, rejecting push for federal environmental impact review

Top California Dem running for office tied to Chinese school accused of US diploma scandal

Fetterman receives no support for re-election from Pennsylvania House Democrats: report

Despite official assurances, the 2020 election wasn’t the ‘most secure’ election in U.S. history

Kayleigh’s Law,’ named for child sex abuse victim, permits 25-year restraining orders in California

Queen of Mandating Vaccines’: Trump CDC nominee rankles vaccine skeptics, heartens elites

Treasury imposes sanctions on 14 targets for helping Iran acquire weapons, as part of Economic Fury

Military spy budget surges 49%, as Trump admin requests $50B for Military Intelligence Program

Author argues religions thrive when demanding more from participants

Court upholds Texas law requiring Ten Commandments in classrooms

Bruce Springsteen trashed by NJ paper over expensive anti-Trump concerts: ‘Hypocritical crap’

Patel lashes out at press over story painting him as drunk and AWOL

The House Ethics Committee is at a crossroads. Members say they’re ready to make some changes.

CIA Officers Reportedly Die After Narco Operation

Trans Election Official Complains ‘Bottom Surgery’ Costs Too Much In U.S.

Criminal Investigation Targets ChatGPT After What Gunman Did With AI

Senate Dem Cheers for Iran Defeating U.S.

 Senator Chris Murphy from Connecticut has faced criticism after posting a seemingly inappropriate comment on social media regarding a recent event involving Iran, leading to accusations of disloyalty.

• Murphy posted "Awesome" on X in response to a report that 26 ships in Iran's shadow fleet evaded the U. S. blockade in the Gulf of Oman.

• His comment sparked accusations of being a "traitor" amid ongoing tensions with Iran.

• Murphy claimed his remark was sarcastic, but past actions raise doubts about this interpretation.

• He has previously met with Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, which President Trump criticized as potentially illegal conduct under U. S. law.

• The situation highlights longstanding concerns about Murphy's engagement with Iranian officials.

Senator Murphy is under scrutiny for his comments and actions related to Iran, with critics viewing his behavior as undermining U. S. interests, questioning his loyalty during a time of conflict. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/senate-dem-cheers-for-iran-defeating-u-s/

New York City’s Comptroller Just Made a Risky Decision with Pension Funds

 New York City Comptroller Mark Levine has announced a plan to invest $4 billion of the city’s pension funds in affordable housing. This decision has raised concerns about the risk management and timing of such an investment.

• Investment Plan: Levine aims to double the city's pension investment in affordable housing to address the housing crisis through office conversions and affordable housing projects.

• Risk Management Issues: Critics argue that investing heavily in local real estate may expose pension funds to significant risks, especially if the New York City economy faces a downturn.

• Regulatory Challenges: The article highlights the negative impact of the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019, which has led to a sharp decline in the profitability of affordable housing investments.

• Upcoming Legislative Changes: Proposed legislation could reduce the retirement age for union workers and eliminate pension contributions for some employees, further complicating pension fund stability.

• Taxpayer Implications: Poor returns from these investments could lead to increased financial burdens on taxpayers if the pension funds do not perform adequately.

The initiative to invest in affordable housing using pension funds is seen as a risky decision that may not align with the fiduciary duty to safeguard the financial interests of pensioners. Critics argue that it may worsen existing financial challenges related to New York City's housing market and overall pension fund health. 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/new-york-city-comptroller-mark-levine-pension-funds-affordable-housing

The End of EPA’s Endangerment Finding Is a Bigger Deal Than the Iran War

 The recent repeal of the 2009 Endangerment Finding by the Trump Administration's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has significant implications for U. S. climate regulations and policies. This decision is viewed as more impactful than the current conflict involving Iran. The Endangerment Finding allowed for regulations treating carbon dioxide as a pollutant, which was foundational to U. S. commitments to international climate agreements. The repeal is expected to shift the landscape of climate policy and economic implications surrounding environmental regulations.

• Significance of the Endangerment Finding: The Endangerment Finding was crucial as it legally defined carbon dioxide as a pollutant under the Clean Air Act. Its removal undermines major climate regulations established during the Obama and Biden administrations and paves the way for a reduction in federal oversight on environmental issues.

• Economic Implications: The Trump administration claims this repeal could lead to $1.3 trillion in savings over ten years by reducing regulatory burdens on industries, potentially resulting in cheaper automobiles and other consumer goods. In contrast, the ongoing war in Iran is costing billions daily, suggesting a complex economic landscape where environmental regulation could heavily influence long-term economic growth.

• Criticism of Regulatory Overreach: Critics argue that heavy regulations can stifle innovation and impose significant opportunity costs on the economy. The piece suggests that stringent regulations may have held back advancements similar to how privacy laws might have impacted the development of smartphone technologies.

• Potential for Industry Growth: The article argues that by reversing the Endangerment Finding, the U. S. could revitalize heavy industry, thereby creating numerous jobs while still adhering to reasonable environmental laws. It asserts there is still potential for an effective balance between economic development and environmental protection.

• Shift in Global Climate Politics: With the U. S. potentially retracting its commitments under international climate agreements, other countries like Russia and China may follow suit. The piece posits that these nations have historically viewed climate regulations as tools for economic manipulation rather than genuine environmental concerns.

• Call for New Legislation: There is mention of the Affordable, Reliable, Clean Energy Security Act (ARC-ES), which could further define and support U. S. energy policies. This legislation aims to ensure that energy sources remain both affordable and environmentally friendly, thereby promoting industry while protecting the environment.

• Critique of Media Coverage: The article critiques current media practices for not adequately covering significant issues such as the Endangerment Finding repeal, suggesting that attention is disproportionately given to conflicts like the war in Iran. This points to a broader concern regarding the public's awareness and understanding of important regulatory changes.

The repeal of the Endangerment Finding signifies a pivotal moment in U. S. climate policy, potentially leading to significant economic change and a shift away from international climate commitments. Advocates argue for a balanced approach that encourages industry growth while addressing environmental concerns. The ongoing discourse reveals the complexities and controversies surrounding climate regulation, economic impacts, and media representation in contemporary discourse. 

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2026/04/21/the-end-of-epas-endangerment-finding-is-a-bigger-deal-than-the-iran-war/