Thursday, November 12, 2026

Democrats Want to Abolish DHS—and Make Taxpayers Subsidize Universal Mail-In Voting

Democratic Representative Delia Ramirez proposes a bill, H.R. 10803, that aims to dismantle the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and redirect its resources. This legislation includes measures for universal mail-in voting, civic education focused on equity, and changes to immigration laws regarding noncitizens who vote illegally.

1. Abolishment of DHS:

The proposed bill seeks to abolish DHS and create a new department responsible for community safety. It aims to redirect resources towards various civic initiatives.

2. Funding for Mail-In Voting:

The legislation includes provisions for federal grants that support universal mail-in voting, early voting without excuses, and language-accessible voting processes.

3. Removal of Deportation Grounds:

The bill would eliminate the deportation consequences for noncitizens who vote unlawfully, although it maintains the criminal ban on noncitizen voting.

4. Civic Education Programs:

The new department would provide funding for civic curricula teaching about constitutional rights, systemic equity, and participatory democracy, along with support for community engagement initiatives.

5. Broader Funding Initiatives:

The legislation also proposes a reallocation of DHS funding towards universal healthcare, housing, and education, beyond just voting-related grants.

H.R. 10803 is a comprehensive bill focused on dismantling DHS and promoting civic engagement through mail-in voting and education, while revising immigration practices related to voting. The plan has significant implications for federal resource allocation and immigration policy. 

https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/democrats-want-to-abolish-dhsand?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=3382126&post_id=224416732&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

"We Have Come To Annihilate You": Bomb Threats Empty Hundreds Of Schools Across Europe

On November 11, 2026, hoax bomb threats targeted schools in Italy, Ireland, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, leading to numerous evacuations. These emails caused significant alarm but were deemed largely uncredible by authorities.

• Italy's Response: The Italian Education Ministry reported that around 6,000 schools received threatening emails, resulting in evacuations of about 300 schools. The email claimed there was a bomb in a bag and in the prime minister's car. PM Giorgia Meloni stated that there was no concrete danger found.

• Threat's Nature: The email contained aggressive language, stating their intent to "annihilate" and "carry out a genocide". Authorities considered the threats to be attention-seeking rather than from a serious terrorist group.

• Additional Queries: Other nations, including Scotland and Northern Ireland, experienced similar threats; however, police in these regions found no reason to evacuate schools, categorizing the threats as not credible.

• Ongoing Investigations: Italian prosecutors have opened an investigation into the incidents. The threats appeared to come from a hacked email account at Taiwan's Daye University.

• Context of Broader Threats: These bomb threats are part of a larger pattern of disruptions across Europe, including false alarms concerning flights and other institutions. In the previous weeks, threats had been directed at flights and reported to have no explosives found.

The series of bomb threats across schools in Europe has provoked widespread concern but has been largely assessed as hoaxes. Investigations continue into the origins of the threats, which highlight ongoing security challenges in Europe. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/we-have-come-annihilate-you-bomb-threats-empty-hundreds-schools-across-europe

Ilhan Omar’s Citizenship Nightmare Just Got Worse, and Tom Emmer Says DOJ Is ‘Finalizing’ It

Incoming House Minority Whip Tom Emmer (R-MN) has stated that the Justice Department is nearing the end of its investigation into Rep. Ilhan Omar's (D-MN) claim about her birth date. This investigation is part of a broader federal inquiry that includes multiple allegations against her.

• Emmer asserts that if Omar is found to have lied about her age, it could result in her loss of U.S. citizenship, which would disqualify her from serving in Congress. He claims this is a procedural matter rather than needing a Congressional vote.

• There are four aspects being investigated concerning Omar's citizenship claims, but Emmer did not provide details on the other three points.

• A request was made by Omar’s staff to change her birth year from 1981 to 1982 after her election, which is significant because it affects her eligibility for derivative citizenship through her father's naturalization.

• Omar has maintained that she was a minor when her father became a U.S. citizen, intending to prove her eligibility for citizenship. However, the 1981 birth date would indicate she was 18, complicating her claims.

• Omar successfully won reelection in a heavily Democratic district, asserting her strength against allegations from former President Trump's administration.

The ongoing investigations into Rep. Omar’s citizenship and related allegations have raised significant political and legal questions, affecting her standing in Congress despite recent electoral success. 

https://redstate.com/rusty-weiss/2026/11/12/ilhan-omars-citizenship-nightmare-just-got-worse-and-tom-emmer-says-doj-is-finalizing-it-n2209312

Democracy Dies In Democrats' Delusion, Deflection, And Dilution

 The challenges facing democracy in America, focusing on the actions and strategies of the Democrats after they regained control of Congress on November 3. It argues that rather than genuinely addressing issues affecting voters, Democrats are entrenched in delusion, deflection, and dilution.

1. Delusion:

• Democrats have convinced voters that they offer essential solutions for democracy's survival. They promise free services, like Medicare for All, without revealing the enormous costs involved.

• Such promises often lead to higher taxes and inflation, ultimately making life less affordable for citizens.

2. Deflection:

• Instead of addressing pressing issues, Democrats are focusing on targeting Donald Trump and his associates. They have indicated intentions to launch investigations and subpoenas to distract from economic challenges.

• This approach prevents them from having to explain the lack of progress on promised relief for citizens.

3. Dilution:

• Democrats aim to weaken conservative influence and ensure a lasting majority. Proposals such as expanding the Supreme Court, granting statehood to Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico, and abolishing the Electoral College are part of this strategy.

• These changes could permanently alter the political landscape, ensuring that Democrats remain in power for generations while framing their actions as necessary for democracy.

The article posits that the Democrats are not genuinely committed to protecting democracy but are instead enacting a strategy that could dilute democratic processes. It warns that the promises made to voters may lead to detrimental consequences, and should democracy fail, it will not be in obscurity but through the overt actions of those claiming to defend it. The public is cautioned to remain aware of these developments as they unfold.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/11/democracy-dies-in-democrats-delusion-deflection-and-dilution/

Democrats And The Media Will Always Hate Trump. He Shouldn’t Forget That

In a recent 60 Minutes interview, President Trump made statements that raised concerns about his approach to immigration and his relationship with Democrats and the media.

• Trump often makes headlines, making it challenging to gauge his seriousness during interviews.

• When asked about cooperation with a Democratic majority, Trump mentioned immigration, suggesting that certain undocumented immigrants contribute positively to society.

• There is a significant Democratic base that supports the idea of allowing some immigrants to stay in the country.

• Despite the contentious nature of immigration, recent exit polls indicated that voters still prefer Republican views over Democratic ones on this issue.

• Many believe Democrats will not negotiate with Trump unless it involves granting amnesty to all undocumented immigrants.

• Trump faces an uphill battle with Democrats who will take control of Congress, and they are likely to pursue aggressive actions against him and his associates.

• During another interview, Trump expressed a desire for his legacy to be preserved through naming projects after himself, hinting at his concern over how he will be remembered.

• He can still push for significant policies like immigration reform and promoting his name, even with limited time left in office.

Trump needs to focus on his base and remain firm on immigration, as leniency may not change the perception of his opponents, who are eager to undermine him as he concludes his term. 

https://thefederalist.com/2026/11/11/democrats-and-the-media-will-always-hate-trump-he-shouldnt-forget-that/

Democrats did it for Biden. Now Trump wants the same lame-duck judicial blitz

As the impending transition of congressional control approaches, President Donald Trump is urging Senate Republicans to prioritize confirming his judicial nominees. With less than 60 days before Democrats take power, there is mounting pressure to expedite these confirmations.

• Trump's Requests: President Trump has emphasized the importance of confirming 161 nominations, including 25 federal judges, before the Democrats assume control of the Senate. He has made public statements advocating for swift action on these nominations.

• Senate Response: Senate Republicans, led by Majority Leader John Thune, are gearing up to maximize the remaining session time to push through these judicial appointments. The pace of nominations is reported to be the fastest since the Reagan era.

• Judicial Landscape: Trump's first term saw the confirmation of 234 judges, including three Supreme Court justices, which is significant given the four-year span compared to previous presidents who served eight years. As of now, 24 additional nominations are pending in the Senate.

• Bipartisan Dynamics: The push for rapid confirmations is not new; Democrats performed similar actions for Biden's nominees before losing control of the Senate. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer expressed a commitment to keeping the bench filled with qualified candidates and resisting undesirable appointments.

• Judicial Statistics: Currently, about one-third of active federal judges are Trump nominees. In total, 57 judges have been confirmed during his second term, although this includes a slower rate of confirmations due to fewer vacancies.

• Negotiated Outcomes: In a previous maneuver, both parties reached a compromise that allowed Biden to exceed Trump's confirmation count by one judge before the congressional shift, showcasing the cyclical nature of judicial confirmations in a politically charged environment.

The Senate faces a busy schedule filled with legislative demands alongside the urgent need to address judicial nominations in the limited time available before Democrats take control. With numerous judicial vacancies still on the table, the outcome will influence Trump's judicial legacy and the balance of the federal judiciary for the foreseeable future. The Senate Judiciary Committee is actively pushing forward with candidate confirmations, aiming to meet the deadline set by the upcoming change in power. 

https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/democrats-did-it-biden-now-trump-wants-same-lame-duck-judicial-blitz

The Midterms Should Be a Wake-Up Call: Time to Clear Out the Deep State

 The midterm results in 2026 have raised urgent concerns about the deep state within the federal government, prompting a call for action from Republicans to support President Trump’s leadership and agenda.

1. Wake-Up Call: The recent election results serve as a strong reminder for President Trump and his team that there is a pressing need to eliminate deep state influence in the government.

2. Current Threats: With the GOP losing control of Congress, there’s an increased risk of Democrat-led investigations and disruptive actions against political opponents that could hinder Trump's agenda.

3. Deep State Presence: Notable cases within the Treasury Department, such as Erika Nijenhuis and Kevin Salinger, have been highlighted for their previous donations to Democrat candidates, raising questions about their allegiance to Trump’s policies.

4. Potential Sabotage: Incidents like the hidden-camera footage of Navy official Brandon Newsom discussing plans to undermine elected leaders signify deep-rooted opposition against the administration.

5. National Security Concerns: The Pentagon has dealt with serious leaks, including classified information related to Iran and Ukraine by high-ranking officials, showcasing the risks of internal sabotage against national policy.

6. Successful Leadership: Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been recognized for his effective leadership and efforts to shield the State Department from internal threats, stressing the importance of loyalty to the President's agenda.

To secure the future of the United States and prevent a return to the chaotic policies of the past, it is crucial for the Trump administration to address and remove deep state operatives. All Cabinet members are encouraged to emulate Rubio's approach and ensure that government positions are held by individuals who support the President's objectives.

https://amgreatness.com/2026/11/12/the-midterms-should-be-a-wake-up-call-time-to-clear-out-the-deep-state/

Democrats Want to Abolish DHS—and Make Taxpayers Subsidize Universal Mail-In Voting

Democratic Representative Delia Ramirez proposes a bill, H.R. 10803, that aims to dismantle the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and re...