NYC Neighborhood Where 70% of People Voted for Zohran Mamdani Now Suing His Administration for Locating a Homeless Shelter There

Residents of New York City's East Village, who voted overwhelmingly for Mayor Zohran Mamdani, are now suing him. Their lawsuit is in response to his decision to relocate a homeless shelter to their neighborhood.

• East Village voters supported Mayor Zohran Mamdani by 70%.

• The lawsuit challenges Mamdani's plan to move the Bellevue homeless shelter to an intake center in their area, located at 8 East 3rd Street.

• The filing claims the city acted too quickly and did not follow proper legal procedures to make such a significant decision.

• Residents are concerned about the safety and implications of relocating the shelter, which is known for housing potentially dangerous individuals.

The situation highlights a contradiction where voters who supported a liberal agenda are now opposed to its implications in their neighborhood. This has resulted in legal action against the very policies they supported, raising questions about the practical outcomes of their voting choices.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/04/nyc-neighborhood-where-70-people-voted-zohran-mamdani/ 

37 Senate Democrats Urge USPS to Refuse Trump’s Vote-by-Mail Executive Order

On Monday, 37 Senate Democrats sent a letter to the U. S. Postal Service (USPS) board opposing an executive order from March 31 that requires USPS to use state-provided lists to determine voter eligibility for mail-in and absentee ballots. The order emphasizes U. S. citizenship as a criteria for receiving these ballots.

• The letter, led by Senator Chuck Schumer and supported by three committee leaders, argues that the executive order unconstitutionally shifts election control from states to the executive branch.

• Executive Order 14399, signed by President Trump, mandates the creation of uniform standards for mail-in ballot processing within 60 days and prohibits sending ballots to voters not on an eligibility list.

• The order requests the Department of Homeland Security to compile federal citizenship records into state voter eligibility lists.

• Senators claim this order could effectively prevent mail-in voting in states unwilling to comply, giving USPS undue power over election processes.

• There are ongoing legal battles related to both the voter data and mail-in ballot aspects of the order, with lawsuits filed by various parties.

• The White House maintains that election integrity is a priority, claiming the president's policies reflect this agenda.

The Senate Democrats are urging USPS to reject the executive order, asserting it undermines the constitutional role of states in managing elections and could restrict access to voting by mail. 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/37-senate-democrats-urge-usps-to-refuse-trumps-vote-by-mail-executive-order-6015584?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge

Congress Has Established That People Here Illegally Are Not Residents

 The consequences of the 1898 Supreme Court decision in Wong Kim Ark regarding birthright citizenship and its interpretation of residency laws. The article argues that Congress has clarified legal definitions around residency and immigration since that ruling.

• The Wong Kim Ark decision determined some aspects of birthright citizenship but relied on English common law definitions instead of considering the intentions of the Constitution's authors.

• The ruling has allegedly led to an influx of immigrants who may not have legitimate ties to the United States, including "anchor babies" and "birthright tourists" who intentionally give birth on U. S. soil to gain citizenship for their children.

• It is claimed that Congress has the authority to define who qualifies as a permanent resident, not the Supreme Court. According to the article, any alien present in the U. S. without a permanent resident card is not a resident and therefore cannot confer citizenship to a child born in the U. S.

• Recent congressional laws have established who is considered a visitor or invader in terms of immigration. Many who entered without permission are classified as invaders.

• Legal definitions of immigration categories include permanent residents, immigrants, and visitors, as well as conditions for asylum seekers. Congress has laid out strict definitions which, it is suggested, determine who qualifies for various statuses.

• The article notes that individuals who entered the U. S. without proper authorization, or who violated visa conditions, are subject to deportation.

• Refugee status is outlined by specific criteria, such as having been firmly resettled in another country, which disqualifies many from being considered refugees.

The author argues that the definitions set by Congress regarding residency, entrance, and citizenship should be upheld and applied, suggesting that those without proper documentation or status should be classified as non-residents. The piece emphasizes the need for clearer legal standards and enforcement around immigration to address issues stemming from the Wong Kim Ark decision.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/04/congress_has_established_that_people_here_illegally_are_not_residents.html

National Republicans Dodge Questions About VA Ground Game As Locals Allege ‘None Of Them Spent Any Money’

The recent statewide election in Virginia has raised significant concerns among Republican leaders, who feel underfunded and outmaneuvered by Democrats. The election not only impacted local representation but is viewed as a crucial juncture in the broader national political landscape.

1. Election Outcome and Implications:

• Republicans lost a critical referendum in Virginia, which allows Democrats to redraw congressional district maps, potentially resulting in a major shift from a 6-5 to a 10-1 Democratic advantage. This outcome is seen as a significant blow to Republican power and strategy.

2. Perception of Victory despite Loss:

• Following the defeat, Republican members expressed optimism, calling the turnout of over a million votes against a heavily financed campaign a moral victory. However, many acknowledge that this sentiment lacks practical benefit against the backdrop of losing key strategic positions.

3. Discontent Among Republicans:

• Frustration is evident within the Republican ranks, with calls for greater involvement and investment at the national level. Local party leaders believe that national issues were underestimated and funding misallocated, particularly with funds diverted to other states over Virginia.

4. Financial Disparities:

• Democrats significantly outspent Republicans, leading to a funding gap where the “Yes” campaign raised three times as much as the “No” campaign. Despite Republicans possessing substantial financial resources collectively, much of it did not reach the local efforts in Virginia.

5. Calls for Better Strategy and Coordination:

• Critics argue the Republican National Committee (RNC) did not leverage its fundraising effectively in Virginia, while local leaders emphasize the need for improved coordination and response strategies to voter outreach and engagement. They suggest that a lack of grassroots support may have contributed to the loss.

6. Judicial Developments:

• A state judge recently declared the referendum unconstitutional, putting the results on hold pending review by the Virginia Supreme Court. This situation adds another layer of complexity and uncertainty to the electoral outcome.

7. Comments from Party Leaders:

• RNC officials defend their efforts, indicating that they had made strategic investments in election integrity and voter outreach programs. However, there's a call for transparency regarding the extent of these efforts and their effectiveness.

8. Future Implications:

• The results of this election may set a precedent for future political dynamics in Virginia and possibly influence national strategies as Republicans aim to reclaim ground lost to Democrats in a changing political landscape.

The recent election in Virginia highlights not only the immediate political challenges within the state but also raises questions about the national Republican strategy and funding allocation. As the RNC assesses its efforts, both local and national party leaders are urged to ensure better coordination and resource deployment to avoid losses in future elections. 

https://thefederalist.com/2026/04/23/national-republicans-dodge-questions-about-va-ground-game-as-locals-allege-none-of-them-spent-any-money/

Mainstream media pounce on NIH director for raising evidence standards for CDC research

The research standards of the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) under the Biden administration, specifically regarding COVID-19 studies. Prominent public health experts have challenged the reliability of the research presented while highlighting issues in current methodologies used by the CDC.

1. Research Reliability Issues:

Under Biden, the CDC claimed that indoor mask-wearing significantly reduced COVID-19 infection rates. However, critics pointed out the unreliability of a study based on low response rates from a survey on Californians' masking habits and infection history.

2. Criticism from Experts:

Experts including NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Commissioner Marty Makary criticized MMWR for using flawed methodologies, particularly a "test-negative" design deemed unreliable for measuring vaccine efficacy.

3. Controversy over Canceled Study:

A study showing new COVID vaccines effectively reduced emergency visits and hospitalizations was reportedly canceled by Bhattacharya, who identified its methodology as statistically flawed. This decision raised accusations of suppressing research that contradicts health policies.

4. Media’s Response and Misrepresentation:

Major newspapers like The Washington Post and New York Times omitted the problematic history of MMWR in their reports, implying that the journal undergoes peer review without clarifying that MMWR is not peer-reviewed.

5. Public Health Experts’ Involvement:

Several public health professionals who criticized MMWR during the Trump administration later worked in the FDA. Their concerns led to increased scrutiny of the CDC’s research methods and the publication standards of MMWR.

6. Future of CDC Research Standards:

There are ongoing discussions about reforming how the CDC conducts and publishes research, particularly in light of Bhattacharya's concerns about methods and the necessity for rigorous standards in studies related to COVID-19.

The article underscores significant debates about the integrity of research published by the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, raising questions about the methodologies being used to assess public health strategies for COVID-19. The push for improved research standards reflects a critical examination from both public health experts and mainstream media, indicating a challenging landscape for scientific communication in health policy. 

https://justthenews.com/index%2ephp/politics-policy/coronavirus/mainstream-media-pounce-nih-director-raising-evidence-standards-cdc

News roundup:

 DOJ arrests soldier who made $400,000 betting on Maduro’s removal: Sources

10 hurt in shooting at mall in Louisiana, suspect at large: Officials

Ex-police officer arrested in mass shooting plot: Investigators

Meta to lay off 8,000 as part of AI efficiency push

Israel-Lebanon ceasefire extended by three weeks, Trump says

RFK Jr.’s peptide push could become next wellness boom

U.S. Revolutionary War Artifacts Unearthed at Site of Infamous Colonial Heist

Warner Bros. Discovery Shareholders Approve Paramount Acquisition as Hollywood Celebrities, Democrats Protest Mega Merger

DOJ Reclassifies Marijuana, Building on President Trump’s Earlier E.O.

FBI Director Kash Patel, New York Times clash over paper’s claim its reporter was ‘investigated’

Harvard students revolt over new grading policy they call ‘racist’

Republicans fail to attach SAVE America Act to party-line funding package

Study shows salmon exposed to cocaine swim longer distances… no kidding

Trump administration accuses Chinese actors of stealing U.S. artificial intelligence systems

DOJ’s IG to review release of Epstein files

Jobless claims slight increase last week, but numbers indicate layoffs are low

House Republicans scrambling to put together FISA extension bill before deadline

Trump picked a fight with Anthropic. Now the administration is backing off.

Florida takes its anti-DEI fight to the NFL

Suburban Mom? Try Wanted Murderer Tied To One Of The Deadliest Gangs

Burned And Disfigured: Iran’s Nepo Supreme Leader Needs Plastic Surgery

Here’s What Nobody’s Telling You About The ‘Missing Scientists’ Cases

China Tries To Play Both Sides In Iran, But Cracks Are Starting To Show

U.S. special forces soldier arrested over Polymarket bets on Maduro raid

Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders approve Paramount Skydance deal

Transgender Dem. Rep. McBride Claims Trump ‘Only Fires Women’

California ‘basic income’ experiment fails to provide ‘financial independence,’ study finds

Trump Cabinet member scraps Obama-era gender identity housing rule, cites ‘biological reality’

ICE nabs illegal aliens convicted of child sex crimes and meth trafficking in nationwide enforcement sweep

Michigan Sec of State Benson faces scrutiny over SPLC ties after group’s indictment

Trump push to restrain birthright citizenship gets ammo from unlikely source: liberal polling group

Trump confirms he’s weighing a taxpayer takeover of Spirit Airlines “for the right price”

Trans killer housed in Oregon women’s prison wins high-dollar legal settlement in sex abuse suit

Pentagon email floats suspending Spain from NATO, other steps over Iran rift: report

Golden Dome dreams face harsh budget reality

The Last Word on the Russia Hoax?

The political actions and events surrounding the Obama and Clinton administrations, emphasizing how they allegedly manipulated information regarding terrorism and the Russia investigation to protect their interests. The piece draws connections between significant incidents, particularly the Benghazi attack and the Trump-Russia narrative, positioning these events as part of a broader conspiracy.

1. Initial Misrepresentation of Islam:

• The narrative begins with President George W. Bush labeling Islam a religion of peace shortly after the 9/11 attacks, which is critiqued as a misunderstanding.

• Barack Obama is portrayed as perpetuating this image of Islam while failing to recognize the Islamic terrorist threat.

2. Benghazi Incident:

• On September 11, 2012, four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, were murdered in Benghazi due to insufficient security, despite prior warnings.

• Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are accused of fabricating a narrative that downplayed the attack, blaming it on a spontaneous protest rather than acknowledging the terrorist threat.

3. Political Fallout and Election Manipulation:

• The Benghazi probe led to the discovery of Hillary Clinton's secret email server, which became a major political issue.

• To distract from her own legal troubles, Clinton purportedly initiated the idea of painting Donald Trump as a Russian asset, a plan supported by Obama.

4. Formation of the Russia Investigation:

• The piece describes how the Clinton campaign hired Fusion GPS for opposition research, leading to the creation of the Steele dossier, filled with unverified and damaging claims about Trump.

• Key figures, including Clinton and Obama, allegedly collaborated to shift the FBI's focus from Clinton's emails to Trump’s campaign.

5. Implementation of the Investigation:

• The article claims that the FBI, under Comey’s leadership, publicly distanced itself from prosecuting Clinton while simultaneously opening an investigation into Trump based on flimsy evidence.

• The intelligence community’s collective effort, led by figures like James Clapper, is criticized for misleading the public about Russian interference.

6. Continuing Impact on Trump's Presidency:

• After Trump's election win in 2016, Obama and his allies attempted to undermine his presidency through continued investigations and media campaigns.

• The article asserts that this constituted a modern coup, utilizing governmental resources to destabilize a democratically elected president.

7. Public Perception and Accountability:

• Despite the alleged misconduct, major players, including Obama and Clinton, have not faced accountability, while public opinion remains divided over their actions.

• There is a call for the truth about these events to be recognized and documented accurately in history.

The article presents a critical view of how Obama and Clinton allegedly manipulated political narratives and law enforcement for their own benefit, particularly regarding the Benghazi attack and the Russia investigation. It posits that these actions represent significant political corruption that needs recognition in American history, calling for accountability and a return to truth in political discourse. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/the-last-word-on-the-russia-hoax/