From Hijab Try-Ons To Islam Patches, How Mosque-Based Troops Are Embedding “Islamic Values” Into Girl Scout Programs Across America

 An investigation has revealed that Girl Scout troops based in mosques across the United States are incorporating Islamic teachings and practices into their programs.

Events at mosques, such as the SALAM Islamic Center, feature activities like hijab try-ons and Quranic instruction, aimed at teaching about Islamic values.

For example, a February 2025 event included learning about hijabs, mosque tours, and a booth on Palestine, without clear communication to parents about the religious content.

The SALAM Islamic Center advertises its participation in Girl Scouts as promoting "Strong Islamic Values," aligning with its educational mission.

Previous activities included a Ramadan sleepover with prayers and discussions, demonstrating the blending of Islamic teachings with Girl Scout principles.

This trend is not unique to SALAM; other mosques nationwide are adopting a similar approach, combining Islamic practices with Girl Scout activities, including special badges related to Islam.

Girl Scouts of the USA has supported these initiatives, promoting the connection between scouting and Islamic education.

The integration of Islamic values within Girl Scout programs reflects a growing trend in private sectarian education efforts within public organizations.

https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/exc-from-hijab-try-ons-to-islam-patches?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=3382126&post_id=211370526&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Why Is the Democrat Party Short on Cash?

 As the Midterm Elections approach, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) is experiencing a significant financial challenge compared to the Republican National Committee (RNC). This situation has prompted the DNC to make unusual financial decisions and raise concerns regarding donor confidence.

Current Financial State:

The DNC reported $16.3 million in cash but is $18.5 million in debt, resulting in a shortfall of $2.2 million.

The RNC, in contrast, has set records for cash-on-hand, with Republican committees combined raising $800 million versus $334 million for Democrats.

Historical Context:

The current financial gap is wider than in previous midterms when the party out of power usually faces fundraising difficulties. In June 2018, for instance, the DNC had a positive cash balance, while now it is in the red.

Reasons for the Shortfall:

1. Political Control: The Republican party controls the White House and Congress, which typically attracts more donations.

2. Donor Frustration: Wealthy Democrat donors are reportedly withholding contributions due to dissatisfaction with the party's direction and past election losses.

3. Spending Choices: The DNC, led by Chair Ken Martin, prioritized early expenditures on state parties and infrastructure over conserving funds for later advertising needs.

4. Significant Debt: The DNC incurred a $15 million loan late last year.

5. Donor Trends: Key high-profile donors, including George Soros, have not provided direct financial support to the DNC this cycle, focusing instead on specific candidates or PACs.

Impact of Trump:

Donald Trump's influence has contributed to heightened Republican fundraising, allowing for greater coordination and financial support for specific races, aided by recent changes in campaign finance regulations.

The financial struggles of the DNC as the midterms approach raise questions about their ability to compete effectively against Republicans. As party dynamics change and donor behaviors evolve, these financial disparities could affect electoral outcomes. While the DNC's leadership defends their spending strategy, the persistent debt and donor hesitation present substantial challenges for the party moving forward. 

https://sharylattkisson.substack.com/p/why-is-the-democrat-party-short-on?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=2579146&post_id=212234382&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

More Westerners Waking up to Islam as Gov't Bans Face Coverings, Leaving Both Muslims and (Ironically) Feminists Angry

 Recently, Portugal has enacted a law banning face coverings in public, commonly referred to as the "burka law." This decision has sparked discussions regarding its implications for Muslim women and the broader societal context.

President António José Seguro signed the law, which was supported by a right-wing coalition in the government.

The new law prohibits wearing any clothing that covers the face in public, with fines imposed ranging from 150 to 3,000 Euros, and those forcing someone to cover their face may face up to three years in prison.

There are exceptions for specific activities including professional, health, artistic, advertising, or entertainment settings.

The law does not apply to aircraft, diplomatic visits, or places of worship like mosques.

João Godinho Martins from Amnesty International criticized the law, stating it violates the human rights of Muslim women who choose to wear face coverings as an expression of their faith. He argues it contradicts the promotion of women's rights and may lead to social isolation and barriers in accessing services.

The law was observed to remove direct references to Islam but still targets Muslim women who wear full-face veils.

There is a broader context of similar laws in 24 other countries including several in Europe, reflecting a trend towards regulating face coverings in connection to growing Islamic populations.

The implementation of this law in Portugal raises significant human rights concerns and debates about cultural integration and expression. It highlights tensions between societal norms and individual freedoms, particularly in relation to Islamic practices for women. The conversation continues around similar legislation in other countries, including the U.S. 

https://www.westernjournal.com/westerners-waking-islam-govt-bans-face-coverings-leaving-muslims-ironically-feminists-angry/

El-Sayed Campaign Gets a $175,000 Boost From CAIR, Whose Leader Was 'Happy' About Oct. 7, After Alleging Primary Opponent's AIPAC Support Constituted 'Foreign' Intervention in Election

 The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has contributed significantly to Abdul El-Sayed's Senate campaign in Michigan amid controversy surrounding his views and associations. This summary outlines the key points regarding CAIR's support and El-Sayed's campaign dynamics.

1. CAIR's Donation:

CAIR donated $175,000 to the Fighting for Michigan PAC, which supports El-Sayed's candidacy.

The donation aims to boost the political influence of the Muslim community after the events of October 7, 2023.

2. Campaign Background:

El-Sayed has positioned himself against the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), labeling its influence in politics as "foreign meddling."

His campaign has attracted funding and support from groups linked to leftist and Islamic extremist movements.

3. Controversial Statements:

El-Sayed has campaigned alongside controversial figures, including Hasan Piker, who has made inflammatory remarks about America and Israel.

Some Jewish leaders have accused him of promoting antisemitism due to his rhetoric against AIPAC and connections with figures espousing extremist views.

4. Impact of CAIR Funding:

This funding marks CAIR's largest investment to date in a political campaign and is part of its strategy to elevate Muslim political influence.

CAIR has previously faced scrutiny and accusations of having ties to terrorism and is seen as a controversial organization by political figures like Florida Governor Ron DeSantis.

5. Political Tactics and Advertising:

The Fighting for Michigan PAC, formed to support El-Sayed, has spent nearly $3 million primarily on digital ads focusing on progressive platforms like healthcare.

Recent campaign disclosures indicate the group has engaged in questionable financial practices, including undisclosed payments to political consultants.

6. Poll Outcomes:

Despite spending heavily on polling services, the PAC's predictions were inaccurate, indicating potential issues with their campaign strategy.

CAIR's $175,000 support highlights significant external influences in the Michigan Senate race, particularly strengthening Abdul El-Sayed's campaign, which is rife with allegations of antisemitism and extremist ties. As the campaign progresses, the implications of this funding and the candidate's controversial associations remain under scrutiny, impacting voter perception and political dynamics in the state.

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/el-sayed-campaign-gets-a-175000-boost-from-cair-whose-leader-was-happy-about-oct-7-after-alleging-primary-opponents-aipac-support-constituted-foreign-intervention-in-election/

Trump administration imposes 50% tariffs on Canadian goods after Ottawa fails to finalize trade deal

 The Trump administration recently intensified trade tensions with Canada by imposing 50% tariffs on various Canadian goods. This action followed Canada's decision not to finalize a trade agreement, leading to retaliatory measures from Canada.

The Trump administration announced a 50% tariff on Canadian imports after Canada failed to finalize a trade deal.

Goods affected by the tariffs include alcohol and hockey skates.

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated that Canada did not adhere to the terms negotiated earlier, introducing new demands that disrupted the agreement.

In response, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced the suspension of trade negotiations with the U.S. and imposed tariffs on American products.

Carney expressed disappointment, indicating that Canadian negotiators had acted in good faith throughout the discussions.

The breakdown of trade talks and subsequent tariff impositions mark a significant escalation in U.S.-Canada trade relations. Both nations are now in a standoff as they reassess their negotiation strategies and economic ties.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/trump-administration-imposes-50-tariffs-canadian-goods-after?utm_source=justthenews.com&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=external-news-aggregators

Elizabeth Warren Proves She Has No Idea How the Basic Concept of ‘Supply and Demand’ Works

 Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren faced criticism for her comments on economic concepts, particularly dynamic pricing. Critics argue that her statements reflect a misunderstanding of basic economic principles.

Criticism on CNBC: Elizabeth Warren was mocked on CNBC for fearmongering about the economy and spreading misinformation, particularly following the 2024 election.

Dynamic Pricing Debate: Warren is campaigning against "dynamic pricing," which varies prices based on demand and supply changes. For example, when more ice cream is desired in the summer, prices might rise, which she claims harms consumers.

Economic Basics Ignored: Critics argue that Warren doesn't grasp essential economic concepts like supply and demand. Dynamic pricing is commonplace in many industries, including airlines and hotels, where prices can fluctuate based on time and demand.

Public Reactions: People on social media responded to Warren's tweet questioning if businesses should maintain fixed prices year-round, suggesting that adapting prices is reasonable.

Perception of Democrats: The article implies that Warren's stance is consistent with a broader Democratic narrative that portrays corporations as exploitative, with politicians positioning themselves as protectors of consumers.

Elizabeth Warren's remarks about dynamic pricing have sparked widespread debate and criticism. Many argue that her lack of understanding of basic economics reflects poorly on her role as a senior Senator, while supporters suggest she is fighting for consumer protection against large corporations. This incident highlights ongoing tensions in economic policy discussions within U.S. politics. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/08/elizabeth-warren-proves-she-has-no-idea-how/

Water Systems in Seven States Hacked

 Recent cyber attacks have affected water and wastewater utilities in at least seven states, raising concerns about the security of critical infrastructure in the United States. Both the FBI and EPA have issued warnings regarding these malicious activities.

1. Attack Overview: Malicious actors gained remote access to water facilities, altering IP addresses and passwords, resulting in loss of monitoring capabilities. Issues such as flooding and reduced water pressure were reported, potentially allowing untreated water into the distribution system.

2. Attribution: U.S. officials have linked these attacks to Iranian-affiliated groups following tensions related to U.S. actions in the Strait of Hormuz. Initial reports indicate that over 30 municipal water facilities in Minnesota were impacted.

3. Ongoing Threats: In addition to Iranian actors, officials cite Chinese state-sponsored groups like Volt Typhoon as threats, suggesting they aim to disrupt operations in future geopolitical conflicts.

4. Documented Vulnerabilities: The weaknesses in water systems are longstanding, with prior recommendations to improve cybersecurity often ignored. The Cyberspace Solarium Commission highlighted that many systems were ill-prepared to defend against cyber attacks and continued to rely on vulnerable internet-connected technology.

5. Call to Action: Experts have emphasized the importance of removing exposed operational technology from public networks to enhance security.

These cyber attacks emphasize the urgent need to prioritize the protection of vital water infrastructure. Questions arise about government funding allocations and the decision-making process regarding infrastructure security. 

https://thenewamerican.com/us/water-systems-in-seven-states-hacked/