Thursday, July 9, 2026

The Remaking of South Carolina: Migration, Crony Capitalism, Broken Schools, and a Governor's Race That Could Change Everything


 By Staff

South Carolina is not the state it was twenty years ago. It is not even the state it was five years ago. A relentless influx of northern transplants, a simmering illegal immigration crisis, a public education system stuck in the national basement, an old guard Republican establishment that has perfected the art of crony capitalism, and a Muslim political influence question that has already reshaped communities in Michigan and Minnesota are all colliding in ways that will define the Palmetto State for a generation. The 2026 governor's race has become the flash point.

Drive down I-85 through Greenville or Spartanburg and count the out of state plates. New York. New Jersey. Ohio. Pennsylvania. Connecticut. They came for lower taxes, cheaper housing, and weather that does not require a snowblower. They brought their families, their remote jobs, and their politics.

These are not California style progressives. They are fiscally conservative and socially moderate. They did not grow up Southern Baptist and they do not care about the culture war fights that animated South Carolina politics for decades. They care about property taxes, whether the schools work, and whether the government is wasting their money.

The political effect is already measurable. Charleston County went for Biden in 2020, the first time a Democrat won it since Jimmy Carter in 1976. Greenville County, once the beating heart of upstate Republicanism, is still red but the margins are shrinking. The old Southern Democrat versus Republican binary is dying, replaced by something more suburban, more diverse, and less predictable.

At the same time, illegal immigration has filtered into the state through agriculture, poultry processing, construction, and hospitality. These workers do not vote, but their presence reshapes the labor market, depresses wages at the bottom, and activates native born voters around enforcement. Their children, born here as citizens, will eventually vote. The long term political math is not complicated.

South Carolina passed one of the toughest anti illegal immigration laws in the country back in 2011, modeled on Arizona's SB 1070. It was partially struck down by the courts but signaled where the state stood. Under the Biden years, border numbers spiked nationally and that filtered into every state, South Carolina included. The tension between the state's official posture and its economic dependence on cheap labor has never been resolved.

South Carolina is not Michigan or Minnesota. But as Muslim populations grow anywhere through immigration, refugee resettlement, and higher birth rates, political influence follows. The question for any community is whether that influence is being used to integrate into the existing culture or to carve out exceptions from it. Refugee resettlement in Spartanburg and Columbia has brought Somalis, Burmese, and Congolese to the state. The numbers are not massive. But they are present. And the pattern is worth watching.

South Carolina consistently ranks in the bottom five nationally on education metrics. NAEP scores. Graduation rates. Per pupil spending. This is not an accident. It is a feature of the economic model.

The state funds schools through local property taxes, which means poor rural districts stay poor. The I-95 corridor through the Lowcountry, nicknamed the Corridor of Shame, is a string of underfunded, majority black rural school districts that have been in litigation over funding equity for three decades. The state Supreme Court forced the legislature's hand years ago. The fixes have been slow, minimal, and designed to avoid any real disruption to the tax structure.

The old guard GOP has controlled the legislature since the 1990s and has never made education a real priority. Why would they? The economic model of South Carolina, low taxes, cheap labor, business friendly regulation, does not require a highly educated workforce. It requires a compliant one. BMW, Boeing, Michelin, and Volvo did not come here for the PhDs. They came for the non union workforce and the tax incentives.

Manufacturing jobs are real and they are the crown jewels of the state's economy. BMW in Spartanburg. Boeing in Charleston. Volvo in Ridgeville. But they are highly automated and do not employ the numbers of unskilled workers that textile mills did forty years ago. The textile industry collapsed under NAFTA, automation, and globalization, and nothing replaced it in the rural counties. Rural South Carolina has the same problems as rural Ohio: opioids, declining life expectancy, young people leaving, an aging population. Gig work and service jobs are what remains for people without credentials. Myrtle Beach and Charleston run on hospitality labor. Seasonal. Low wage. No benefits.

The state's economic development strategy has been to poach companies from other states with tax breaks and anti union policies. It works for headline GDP numbers. It does not build a middle class.

When the old guard does talk about education reform, it is private school vouchers and charter expansion. These benefit families who already have the means and social capital to navigate alternatives while further starving the public system that serves everyone else. The rural poor, black and white alike, get left behind.

The cycle is self reinforcing. Bad schools produce a low skill workforce. A low skill workforce attracts employers who want cheap, compliant labor. Those employers demand low taxes. Low taxes mean underfunded schools. Nobody in power has an incentive to break the cycle because everyone in power benefits from it.

The South Carolina GOP is not a monolith. There is a real and growing split.

The old guard is the country club Republicans, the Chamber of Commerce types. They have run the state for decades. Their priorities are keeping taxes low for business, maintaining the status quo on social issues without rocking the boat, and preserving their own power. Henry McMaster has been in state politics since the 1980s. He is the old guard incarnate. The old guard does not want disruption. They want a cheap, compliant labor pool and a business friendly regulatory environment. Education reform costs money and threatens the tax structure. So it never happens.

The populist wing is the Trump aligned, Freedom Caucus types in the state House. The Liberty Caucus or whatever branding they are using now. They are more aggressive on culture war issues, more skeptical of corporate welfare, and more willing to burn down the old guard's power structures. But they are a minority within the state GOP, and the old guard fights them constantly.

What this means for policy is that the old guard and the populists agree on low taxes and gun rights. They disagree on corporate giveaways, spending priorities, and whether to actually fight on education or just manage decline. The old guard wins most of these fights because they control the committee chairs, the fundraising networks, and the relationships with lobbyists.

If you want to understand how the old guard actually governs, forget the campaign rhetoric about fiscal conservatism. Look at Scout Motors.

In 2023, Governor Henry McMaster and Lieutenant Governor Pamela Evette championed a staggering $1.3 billion taxpayer funded incentive package for Scout Motors, a subsidiary of Volkswagen, to build an electric vehicle plant in Blythewood. The deal was sold as an economic development triumph. Four thousand jobs. Two billion in capital investment. Ribbon cuttings and photo ops.

Three years later, the 1,600 acre facility is an industrial desert that has yet to produce a single vehicle. Production has been delayed repeatedly as the American EV market craters. The company put its corporate headquarters in Charlotte, North Carolina, not South Carolina. And the state has blown through an additional $70 million in contingency funds while coming back to taxpayers for $150 million more in cost overruns. The total overrun: $220 million and counting.

Commerce Secretary Harry Lightsey, who still has his job despite this disaster, tried to blame the overruns on the Department of Natural Resources and unusually heavy rainfall. Meanwhile, the McMaster Evette administration and House budget writers attempted to sneak the bailout into the state's $42.6 billion budget through three separate agencies using obscure provisos and "excess debt service funds." Slush fund accounting designed to avoid public scrutiny.

One proviso, 47.22, authorized SCDNR to spend "available excess debt service funds" on economic development purposes tied to the original Scout deal. A second proviso, 84.20, authorized SCDOT to do the same. A third proviso, 112.1, made excess debt service funds at Commerce available for the same purpose. Three different agencies. One giant slush fund.

In the House budget, $153.9 million was placed into this piggy bank. Senators slashed it to $36.8 million. House members reinserted the $117.1 million cut by the Senate, forcing a budgetary stalemate.

And on top of all of it, McMaster wants another $100 million in recurring annual funding from the Education Lottery for EV industry scholarships. That is money meant for students, rerouted to subsidize workforce training for a Volkswagen subsidiary that has not built a single car.

This is the old guard playbook in its purest form. Find a big name company. Offer them an eye popping incentive package justified by promised jobs that may or may not materialize. Sell it as economic development while the real beneficiaries are the corporate executives, the consultants who brokered the deal, and the politicians collecting campaign contributions. When it goes over budget, hide the costs in obscure budget provisos routed through unrelated agencies. When caught, threaten that not paying up will damage the state's reputation. The taxpayers eat the risk. The company gets the upside.

The Commerce Department's defense was telling: "If the state fails to meet its commitments to any economic development project, the result would severely damage the state's ability to compete for future economic development opportunities. Simply put, South Carolina's hard earned reputation as a business friendly state that delivers on its commitments would be undermined."

Translation: pay up or we will tell our corporate friends you cannot be trusted to write blank checks.

Ralph Norman, the fiscally conservative congressman also running for governor, summed it up in two words: "Bunch of crooks!"

"South Carolina families deserve transparency and results, not moving goalposts, cost overruns, or empty promises," Wilson said. "Today, we learned the true overrun on the Scout Motors project isn't $150 million, it's closer to $220 million after a $70 million contingency was already burned through. And now taxpayers are being asked for even more. All while Scout Motors put its headquarters in North Carolina, and our taxpayers are footing the bill here."

"That's not how this should work," Wilson continued. "That's crony capitalism and bad business. As governor, I'll demand accountability. No blank checks. Taxpayer dollars should come with transparency, enforceable claw backs, and real results. Period."

Wilson has also called out the McMaster Evette administration by name: "Why does South Carolina continue to fund corporate boondoggles under a McMaster Evette administration? South Carolina taxpayers should not be on the hook for their failures."

His broader "Waste Removal" plan calls for a "fundamental reset" in how government operates. "The current way of doing things is garbage," Wilson said in rolling out the plan, which he described as a "comprehensive strategy to slash waste and permanently lower taxes." The plan targets the Department of Commerce specifically, promising to "stop corporate bailouts, ensure accountability and transparency, enforce claw backs" while engaging in "smarter planning and execution."

"It's time to take out the trash in government," Wilson said. "Families are being asked to do more with less while Columbia keeps spending more with no accountability. My plan is simple: cut waste, lower your costs, and put more money back in your pocket."

The fact that House leadership had to hide the Scout bailout in three different agency budgets tells you everything. They are not defending the deal on the merits. They are trying to sneak it past voters. Wilson is making sure that does not happen.

These forces are not happening in isolation. They are compounding.

Northern transplants are diluting the old Southern conservative culture while demanding lower taxes and better services, a contradiction that will eventually force a reckoning on education funding and infrastructure. Illegal immigration is reshaping the low wage labor market while activating an enforcement minded native born electorate. The old guard GOP establishment is being challenged from within by a populist wing that actually wants to govern differently rather than just manage decline.

Drew McKissick is not the solution to what ails the South Carolina GOP. He is the embodiment of it. Five terms as party chairman, stretching back to 2017, and what does the state have to show for it? An education system still scraping the bottom of national rankings. An economic development strategy that just burned a billion dollar hole in the taxpayer wallet on a Volkswagen subsidiary that cannot produce a single vehicle. A party apparatus that has perfected the art of winning elections while doing absolutely nothing to change the fundamental rot in how Columbia operates.

McKissick is old guard to the bone. He runs the party the way the old guard runs the state: keep the donor class happy, keep the machinery humming, never take a position that might offend a Chamber of Commerce check writer, and count on gerrymandered districts and cultural resentment to deliver turnout every two years. The SCGOP under his leadership has become a reelection machine for the same people who have been running South Carolina into the ground for three decades. He does not push for education reform because the business class does not want to pay for it. He does not demand transparency from Commerce because his network includes the consultants and lobbyists who profit from deals like Scout Motors. He does not challenge the McMaster Evette style of governance because that is his ecosystem, those are his people, that is the only way he knows how to operate.

The electoral successes he touts, flipped seats, increased turnout, are not achievements of state party strategy. They are the gravitational pull of Donald Trump on a deeply red state. Any warm body in that chair would have presided over the same results. What McKissick has actually done is preside over a party that has grown complacent, entitled, and utterly disconnected from the working people whose votes it takes for granted. The populist wing of the party, the people who actually want to break the cycle of bad schools feeding a low wage economy feeding corporate handouts, has been frozen out by the McKissick machine. The old guard controls the committee chairs, the fundraising networks, and the relationships with lobbyists, and McKissick is the gatekeeper who makes sure it stays that way.

South Carolina does not need a party chairman who has mastered the art of managing decline. It needs a party that is willing to burn down the crony capitalist playbook and actually govern in the interest of the people who live here. That starts with recognizing that Drew McKissick and everything he represents is part of the problem, not the solution.

The through line is that South Carolina's ruling class benefits from the status quo is a deliberate, multi decade project in keeping people just desperate enough not to demand better. A poorly educated population is easier to keep in line, fewer demands, lower expectations, more desperate for whatever job comes along. The old guard GOP does not need to fix the schools because the economic model does not require an educated workforce. It requires a compliant one. The northern transplants flooding down I-85 are not demanding better public schools because they are putting their kids in private schools or buying into the handful of good districts, a private escape hatch that lets them ignore the rot while benefiting from the low taxes the rot makes possible. The rural poor, black and white alike, get left holding the bag. And illegal immigration provides a labor pool for agriculture, construction, and hospitality that is even more exploitable than the native born poor, cheaper, more desperate, less likely to complain. The old guard will never admit this, but they have no real interest in enforcement because the business class wants the labor, and the business class writes the checks that keep the old guard in power. Drew McKissick has spent eight years as party chairman making sure none of this changes. That is his legacy. A well oiled machine that produces election victories and delivers nothing else.

South Carolina is not going blue anytime soon. The rural areas are too red and the state legislature is too gerrymandered for any Democrat to break through at the statewide level. But the character of South Carolina conservatism is changing, and the 2026 governor's race is the first real test of whether the old guard can survive the forces it has spent decades ignoring. Alan Wilson is running explicitly against the crony capitalist playbook that built the McKissick machine. He is naming names, citing dollar figures, and telling voters exactly who has been picking their pockets and why. That is not how South Carolina Republicans typically campaign. It is not how the old guard wants the game played. But it might be exactly what the moment demands.

The question is whether voters are paying attention. For the first time in a long time, they might be. And if they are, a lot of people in Columbia who have grown very comfortable with the way things work should start getting very nervous.


Democrat Voting Registration Group Takes Foreign Money To 'Change The Outcome' Of U.S. Elections Against Republicans

 An investigation reveals that a Berlin-based organization, Power for Democracies, has been actively raising funds from foreign donors to influence U. S. elections, specifically targeting the 2026 midterm and 2028 presidential elections. They aim to mobilize voters against Republican candidates, particularly focusing on Donald Trump and his administration.

1. Funding Strategy:

● Power for Democracies is soliciting approximately $19 million to fund a voter registration and turnout project in the U. S., particularly in 14 key states.

● The project highlights Freedom2Vote, an American nonprofit, as a significant vehicle for this initiative, claiming it could register over 350,000 voters and generate 200,000 additional votes in critical upcoming elections.

2. Political Objectives:

● The initiative explicitly aims to push back against what they refer to as "authoritarianism" linked to Trump's leadership. The strategy is to shift control of Congress during the 2026 midterms and build a voter base for the 2028 elections.

● Power for Democracies promotes Freedom2Vote as an effective way to achieve this, highlighting its measurable impact on voter registration and turnout from prior election cycles.

3. Operational Tactics:

● Freedom2Vote utilizes a targeted approach to engage potential voters from marginalized communities, including young individuals and racial minorities, sending nearly completed registration forms directly to them to assist in the registration process.

● The organization combines public data and proprietary technology from Civitech, a Democratic political-technology firm, to focus on likely Democratic voters while minimizing registrations from Republicans.

4. Civitech's Role:

● Civitech has direct financial ties with the Democratic Party and offers tools designed to enhance Democratic voter registration. Its leadership has a background linked to Hillary Clinton’s campaign, establishing a clear partisan alignment.

5. Foreign Involvement:

● Power for Democracies argues that foreign donors have a stake in U. S. politics, given the impact of U. S. policies on global issues like democracy and climate change. They present the 2026 midterms as foundational for influencing the future political landscape in the U. S.

6. Long-Term Strategy:

● The current focus on the 2026 midterms is part of a broader strategy to mobilize registered voters and set the stage for the 2028 presidential election, aiming to re-establish power against Trump's political influence and promote progressive candidates.

This report outlines how foreign funding is being utilized as a strategy to influence U. S. elections, with a focus on targeting voter registration among demographics likely to support Democratic candidates. By leveraging a nonprofit model and advanced voter technology, the initiative aims not only for immediate electoral impact in the 2026 midterms but also seeks to alter the political landscape leading into the 2028 presidential election.

https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/exc-democrat-voting-registration?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=3382126&post_id=205954015&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

There’s A New Consumer Sheriff In California

 A new agency has been established in California called the California Business and Consumer Services Agency (BCSA), aimed at protecting consumers and supporting businesses. Led by Rohit Chopra, the agency's intentions have raised skepticism regarding its effectiveness and impact on local businesses.

1. Establishment of the BCSA:

● The BCSA was created to safeguard consumer interests and facilitate a fair business climate in California.

● It is a cabinet-level department overseen by Rohit Chopra, who was inaugurated on July 1, 2026.

2. Skepticism About Effectiveness:

● Critics question the feasibility of the BCSA's promises to enhance consumer protection and aid businesses.

● The perception is that instead of fostering growth, the agency may exacerbate existing issues for companies already struggling in a heavily regulated state.

3. Rohit Chopra's Background:

● Chopra previously led the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), known for its extensive regulatory reach.

● While he advocates for consumer protection, his historical approaches have generated criticism, including claims of excessive authority and burdensome regulations.

4. Concerns About Regulation:

● Critics argue that the CFPB's regulations often complicate financial transactions and increase costs for consumers, with claims of straining banks and small-dollar lenders.

● Critics include financial industry professionals who feel the agency's actions lead to higher fees and limited product options for customers.

5. California's Business Exodus:

● California has seen a significant departure of businesses, with hundreds of major corporations relocating to states with more favorable financial climates.

● Such trends raise concerns that the advent of BCSA may further deter businesses from operating in California.

6. Negative Economic Impact:

● There are worries that the BCSA could introduce regulations that elevate consumer costs, reduce available choices, and further harm California’s already struggling economy.

● The state’s reputation as a heavily regulated environment leads many industry observers to forecast additional economic challenges ahead.

While the California Business and Consumer Services Agency aims to provide enhanced protections for consumers, many observers are doubtful about its potential to positively impact California’s economy. With a history of regulatory complications under Chopra's leadership at the CFPB, there are fears that the BCSA could lead to increased costs and further contribute to the state's ongoing business exodus. As California grapples with these developments, the response from both consumers and businesses will be crucial in shaping the agency's legacy.

https://issuesinsights.com/2026/07/09/theres-a-new-consumer-sheriff-in-sacramento/

The Death of Reading

Ann Bauer discusses the significant decline in reading for enjoyment and analyzes the factors contributing to this trend. It highlights the historical context of reading and its evolution, juxtaposing it with the current landscape dominated by media distractions and political views.

1. Historical Context: Reading flourished in the late 19th century with the availability of books to the general public. Authors like Charles Dickens and Leo Tolstoy captivated readers, marking a period known as the "reading revolution. "

2. Decline in Reading: In the past 20 years, reading for pleasure has decreased by 40%. This decline is attributed to several factors, including the rise of the Internet and social media, as well as the oversimplification of literature promoted by modern influencers.

3. Impact of Politics: Bauer argues that rigid political identities may discourage open-mindedness and critical thinking, leading individuals to avoid diverse literature. Consequently, this limits engagement with complex ideas found in novels.

4. Narrowing of Publishing: The publishing industry has become more ideological, focusing on comfortingly familiar ideas rather than challenging narratives. This creates a less enriching reading environment, where books that provoke thought are often overlooked.

5. Cultural Decline: Alongside the decline of reading, other cultural forms of entertainment, like live music and circus events, are diminishing. Present-day media often promotes repetitive and unchallenging content designed for distracted audiences.

6. Call to Actions: The author mentions Christina Dalcher, whose novel "Lexecution" explores themes of authoritarianism and free speech but struggles to gain traction in the current market. Dara offers a potential solution to this crisis: leading a Zoom book club to reignite interest in reading.

7. Join the Initiative: The author encourages readers to join her book club. To participate, readers should subscribe to Christina Dalcher’s updates on X and email Bauer expressing interest in the book club.

Bauer calls for a revival of the joy of reading, advocating for a collective effort to engage with literature meaningfully. The article serves as both a lament of the past and a hopeful invitation to reconnect with the art of reading in an increasingly distracted world. Those interested are invited to join her in reading "Lexecution" and exploring significant narratives that challenge contemporary views. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-death-of-reading/

More Deaths on American Highways at Hands of Noncitizen Truck Drivers

The tragic accidents involving noncitizen truck drivers, highlighting concerns over road safety and immigration policies. It emphasizes the need for more stringent regulations to prevent such incidents.

● Incident Overview: State trooper Michael Pahira Jr. was killed in July 2026 when a truck driver, Michael Bon, an illegal immigrant from Haiti, crashed into him. Bon had obtained a commercial driver’s license (CDL) despite his illegal status.

● Regulatory Context: The Trump administration, under Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, aims to tighten regulation on noncitizen truck drivers, rolling back policies that allow illegal immigrants to receive CDLs.

● Recent Tragedies: Several other cases, including the deaths of a college soccer player and a 23-year-old man changing a tire due to reckless driving by noncitizen truck drivers, illustrate the rising death toll connected to this issue.

● Controversy in Regulation: Two Democratic appellate judges temporarily halted Duffy’s reforms in November 2025, leading to concerns that such actions prevent meaningful changes to improve road safety.

● Current Situation and Future Challenges: Thousands of noncitizen CDLs have been revoked in recent months, yet many noncitizen drivers remain on the roads. Ongoing legal challenges and opposition from pro-immigrant groups complicate efforts to enhance regulations.

The article calls attention to a growing safety crisis on American highways linked to noncitizen drivers with dubious legal backgrounds. It advocates for stricter regulations to ensure that all truck drivers meet necessary safety and legal standards, stressing that public safety should be the priority over lenient immigration policies. 

https://www.declassified.live/p/more-deaths-on-american-highways

Two Roads to the Same Communism

Buck Throckmorton discusses the rise of two forms of communism: the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) model and the climate-focused Net Zero agenda. Both, he argues, threaten individual freedoms and economic stability in the U. S.

1. Growing Influence of DSA:

● DSA candidates are gaining power in the Democratic Party, winning primaries in New York City and elsewhere against traditional Democrats. This trend worries many moderates about potential backlash in upcoming elections.

2. Climate Communism and Historical Parallels:

● The climate change agenda promotes societal changes reminiscent of past communist regimes led by leaders like Pol Pot and Mao. Throckmorton emphasizes the severe outcomes of such radical shifts.

3. Differences and Similarities:

● While the DSA's vision for the U. S. is openly anti-American, the climate agenda presents itself as a benevolent movement for environmental stewardship, concealing its more extreme economic implications. Both types of communism ultimately aim for control over society and the economy.

4. Internal Resistance:

● Some Democratic leaders, including strategist James Carville, are pushing back against the DSA's influence. A small group of Democrats, reflecting a more moderate stance, has released a "Promise to America," advocating for capitalism.

5. Impacts of the Net Zero Agenda in Europe:

● The implementation of Net Zero policies in Europe has led to rising energy costs and economic hardship, as it seeks to abolish fossil fuels. Citizens are severely impacted by energy dependencies and restrictions.

6. U. S. Policies and Economic Freedom:

● In the U. S., Democrats are supporting transitions towards electric vehicles and strict regulations on fossil fuels, which could disenfranchise ordinary Americans. Throckmorton warns this might lead to poverty and decline in quality of life, drawing parallels to historical famines caused by extreme political actions.

7. Misguided Environmentalism:

● The climate movement has attracted many well-meaning individuals, leading them to support policies that threaten economic freedom. Even some Republicans have been drawn into endorsing climate agendas that could undermine American sovereignty and prosperity.

Throckmorton concludes that both DSA-style communism and Net Zero climate communism pose serious risks to freedom and economic stability in the U. S. He urges a rejection of both paths to safeguard the future. 

https://spectator.org/two-roads-to-the-same-communism/

Mississippi Bribing: Mayor Backed by Bernie Sanders Pleads Guilty to Corruption Charges Days After Guilty Plea by Soros-Backed County DA

Former Jackson, Mississippi mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba, endorsed by Senator Bernie Sanders, pleaded guilty to federal bribery and conspiracy charges. His conviction follows that of the former district attorney for Hinds County, Jody Owens.

● Lumumba admitted to conspiracy to commit bribery, wire fraud, and money laundering for giving political favors to real estate developers in exchange for $50,000 in campaign donations.

● He was elected in 2017 on a platform promising to make Jackson a leading progressive city.

● His tenure was marked by high crime rates, with Jackson being labeled the "Murder Capital of America," reaching a murder rate of 99.5 per 100,000 residents in 2021.

● Lumumba called for civil disobedience against police brutality and accused state leaders of racism toward Jackson's predominantly Black population.

● His plea deal represents a significant event within Sanders' political circle, as it follows other scandals involving endorsed candidates, including Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner resigning due to sexual assault allegations.

● Lumumba's attorney argues that his case highlights racial biases in the prosecution of Black officials.

The corruption charges against Lumumba, alongside Owens' similar guilty plea, underscore significant issues facing political leaders in Jackson, revealing a troubling intersection of crime, race, and political influence in the region. This situation poses challenges for Sanders and other progressives connected to the accused officials, raising concerns about accountability and public trust. 

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/mississippi-bribing-mayor-backed-by-bernie-sanders-pleads-guilty-to-corruption-charges-days-after-guilty-plea-by-soros-backed-county-da/

The Remaking of South Carolina: Migration, Crony Capitalism, Broken Schools, and a Governor's Race That Could Change Everything

 By Staff South Carolina is not the state it was twenty years ago. It is not even the state it was five years ago. A relentless influx of no...