Trump was Right About Iran's Bomb

 President Trump was correct in identifying a significant threat from Iran's nuclear weapons program.

• A meeting on February 28, 2026, among Iranian leaders was critical in discussing the future of Iran’s nuclear weapons program.

• Following unsuccessful strikes in June 2025 against Iran's nuclear sites, officials were considering converting 460 kg of uranium enriched to 60% into nuclear weapons.

• The Supreme Leader was expected to approve the weaponization plan during this meeting.

• An informant within the meeting provided intelligence about this plan, prompting an urgent military strike that resulted in the deaths of several key Iranian military and government figures, including the Supreme Leader.

• The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) indicated Iran could produce ten nuclear warheads with further enrichment.

• Reportedly, there are discussions regarding Iran potentially handing over its uranium stockpile to the United States to ease tensions.

The situation regarding Iran's nuclear program remains complicated, with significant events influencing international relations and security strategies. The potential for future negotiations exists, as indicated by ongoing discussions between U. S. envoys and Iranian officials. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/03/trump_was_right_about_iran_s_bomb.html

Fishing expedition: Docs expose expansive FBI surveillance of Trump allies, possible illegality

 Recently released documents have shed light on the FBI's extensive surveillance operations targeting former President Trump's allies during investigations linked to the 2020 election and events leading up to January 6, 2021. This has raised significant concerns regarding potential abuses of power by the FBI and questions about the legality of its actions.

• Subpoenas on Personal Data: The FBI subpoenaed personal data from Kash Patel, a future FBI Director, while he was a private citizen. The subpoenas covered extensive information over two years, including his phone records and personal addresses.

• Impact on Trump Allies: Hundreds of Trump advisors, including Susie Wiles, Trump's campaign manager, were affected by the FBI's investigations, which aimed to probe their communications. There are claims that a private conversation between Wiles and her lawyer was recorded without proper consent.

• Comparison to Watergate: Senator Ted Cruz compared the FBI's actions to the Watergate scandal, arguing that they represent a systematic abuse of power that could undermine democracy. He has called for a thorough investigation into the involved officials.

• Special Counsel's Testimony: Questions have been raised about the honesty of Special Counsel Jack Smith's previous testimonies regarding the scope of his investigations, which included nearly 200 subpoenas targeting over 400 individuals connected to Trump.

• Legal Implications: The monitoring of personal communications poses potential violations of privacy laws, particularly concerning attorney-client privilege. Legal experts suggest that the surveillance could be illegal.

• Lack of Accountability: Despite the troubling findings, it remains unclear if there will be any legal repercussions for the FBI or those who conducted the surveillance.

• Further Investigations Needed: The revelations highlight the necessity of additional investigations into the FBI's conduct and its implications for civil liberties and the justice system.

The new documents indicate that the FBI's investigations into Trump allies may have crossed legal boundaries, raising alarm over mass surveillance that could violate individual rights. This ongoing situation has drawn parallels to historical abuses of power and has inspired calls for accountability and closer scrutiny of governmental actions related to political figures. Further inquiries will be critical to understand the full ramifications of these findings and whether justice will be served. 

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/fishing-expedition-new-docs-lay-bare-expansive-fbi-surveillance-targeting-trump

News roundup:

 House Oversight releases deposition videos of 2 key Epstein associates

New Mexico jury finds Meta violated consumer protection law at trial about child safety

Deal to fund DHS falters amid bipartisan pushback

Iran suspects Trump’s peace talk push is another trick

Rubio testimony sheds light on friend’s shadowy Venezuela play

Democrats flip Florida state seat in Trump’s backyard

White House Official: Reports of Iranians Wanting Vance to Lead Negotiations Are Part of a ‘Foreign Propaganda Campaign’

Federal Judge Dismisses Nuns’ Lawsuit Against Smith and Wesson

Maryland Democrat Wants Tampons in Male Restrooms to Blur Sex Distinction

Report: 3,000 Troops from Army’s Elite 82nd Airborne Set for Rapid Mideast Deployment to Support Iran‑Theater Ops

California Mayor Says State Leaders Protect Child Trafficking by Migrants

Supreme Court appears to side with Trump’s policy on asylum at US-Mexican border

NASA changes plans, will build $20 billion base on the Moon

NJ Gov. Sherrill attends mosque led by Imam once accused of Hamas ties in deportation case

Rick Scott sues Booz Allen Hamilton over leaked tax return

GOP sees overwhelming support for transgenders in sports ballot issues as key to midterm success

US sends 15-point peace proposal to Iran amid conflict in the Middle East

LA’s speed camera rollout comes with stunning homeless loophole

Ex-CIA Director John Brennan slammed for saying he believes Iran more than Trump: ‘Terrorists over the USA’ 

NTSB chair warns against ‘pointing fingers at controllers’ in LaGuardia crash

How Jack Smith connected the dots between GOP lawmakers, Trump aides in 2020 election probe

Peak California: USC Backs Out Of Gov Debate Over Lack Of Diversity

Disney Ditches Billion-Dollar Partnership Over Unexpected AI Collapse

Communist Former CIA Top Dog Says He Believes Iran Over Trump

 This summary outlines the recent remarks made by former CIA Director John Brennan during a discussion on "The View. " Brennan's comments reflect his views on Iran, Donald Trump, and allegations regarding his past political affiliations.

• Brennan's Belief in Iran: During a segment on March 24, 2026, Brennan expressed that he believes Iran, despite it being described as an authoritarian regime known for dishonesty, more than he does Donald Trump. This stance has raised concerns about his perceived bias against Trump and America.

• Political Background: Brennan has previously revealed that he voted for the Communist Party candidate in the 1980 election. He claimed this vote signaled his dissatisfaction with the American political system. He later stated he was neither Democratic nor Republican, but this past raised questions about his political loyalties during his time at the CIA.

• Praise for Islam: In a speech from 2010, Brennan spoke positively about Islam, leading to speculation about a possible conversion. Although his office denied this claim, some former officials contest that he did convert based on observed associations during his tenure in Saudi Arabia.

• Criticisms of Brennan: Critics argue that Brennan has acted more as a partisan than an objective intelligence official. Former CIA employee Bryan Dean Wright noted that Brennan knowingly included the disputed Steele dossier in an important CIA assessment, despite warnings about its credibility. The dossier was pivotal in allegations of Trump’s collusion with Russia.

• Attempts to Undermine Trump: Wright accused Brennan of rushing the production of intelligence assessments to undermine Trump from the start of his presidency, asserting that the outcome was heavily curated to achieve a specific narrative against Trump.

• Impact on Governance: Critics assert that Brennan's actions and those of like-minded officials not only targeted Trump but also threatened the integrity of the American republic as a whole.

John Brennan's comments and alleged actions illustrate significant political biases and a departure from traditional roles within intelligence. His preference for Iran over Trump, past Communist leanings, and efforts to undermine Trump’s presidency emphasize a deeply contentious political landscape. The implications of these points stress a continuing debate regarding loyalty, integrity, and the clash of ideologies within American governance. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/communist-former-cia-top-dog-says-he-believes-iran-over-trump/

California’s Billionaire Tax Proposal Is Already Doing Damage

 California is considering a new billionaire tax that could significantly affect its economy. This tax targets residents with a net worth exceeding $1 billion and proposes a one-time tax of 5% payable over five years. Recent analyses show that this tax may not raise as much revenue as supporters expected.

• Tax Proposal Overview: The proposed tax is aimed at billionaire residents and seeks to generate $100 billion in revenue.

• Wealth Loss: Before even qualifying for the ballot, California's tax base lost an estimated $536 billion due to billionaires like Peter Thiel and Larry Page announcing relocations to escape the tax.

• Revenue Estimates: A Stanford study indicates the tax may only collect about $40 billion, significantly lower than the supporters’ projections. This is partly due to the departure of billionaires leading to substantial future tax income loss.

• Fiscal Consequences: Losing billionaires can have a long-term negative impact on California's finances, as they contribute significantly to state income taxes, estimated at between $3.3 billion and $5.8 billion annually.

• Tax Administration Challenges: Implementing this tax may incur high administrative costs, as determining the value of privately held assets is complex and could lead to extensive litigation.

• Future Implications: Even if voters reject the tax, the fear of similar proposals in the future may discourage investment and business development in California.

California's billionaire tax proposal could weaken the state's economy by driving wealth out and resulting in reduced tax revenues. While the intention is to enhance state funds, the actual outcomes may lead to a poorer fiscal situation, emphasizing the delicate balance between taxation and retaining high-net-worth individuals. 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/california-wealth-billionaire-tax

Iran Caves to Trump

 On March 24, 2026, President Donald Trump announced that Iran has consented to permanently abandon its nuclear weapons program. This agreement is a crucial part of negotiations aimed at ceasing U. S. military strikes against Tehran.

• Trump claimed, “They’ve agreed,” emphasizing that Iran will never possess nuclear weapons as a condition to stop U. S. military operations.

• Despite Trump’s statements, Iran denied any discussions with the U. S. concerning the nuclear program.

• Ongoing negotiations are intended to bring a ceasefire to the war, although preparations are in place for potential military action if talks fail.

• Trump expressed optimism about reaching a deal, suggesting that the Iranian officials are demonstrating a willingness to negotiate.

• He highlighted the objective of removing all nuclear materials, referring to it as "nuclear dust. "

• The U. S. Department of War plans to deploy about 3,000 troops from the Army’s 82nd Infantry Division to the Middle East in support of operations against Iran.

• Trump mentioned a "significant prize" related to the Strait of Hormuz, hinting at a recent beneficial agreement with Iran that involves oil and gas.

President Trump remains hopeful about the potential for a deal with Iran that includes nuclear disarmament. Although Iran denies discussions with the U. S., the focus on ending military engagement and negotiating terms continues as tensions rise in the region. The administration’s strategy includes military readiness alongside diplomatic efforts to navigate this complex situation.

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/03/24/iran-caves-to-trump-n4951028 

O’Keefe Media Group Undercover Investigation Exposes Massive Election Fraud on LA Skid Row

 An undercover investigation by the O’Keefe Media Group (OMG) has unveiled significant allegations of election fraud occurring on Skid Row in Los Angeles. Through hidden-camera footage, the investigation suggests that some petition circulators were involved in a scheme to forge signatures on ballot measure petitions using homeless individuals.

1. The Investigation's Findings:

• James O’Keefe and his team documented individuals known as petitioners paying homeless people as little as $2–$3 to forge signatures on petitions.

• Methods used included providing lists of registered voters’ names and instructing signers on how to replicate those signatures.

• One homeless person revealed that they had signed multiple petitions in a single day for money.

2. Legal Violations:

• The actions depicted in the videos potentially breach multiple California laws, including forgery and election code violations concerning the integrity of ballot measure petitions.

• Specific laws that may have been violated include Elections Code §18613 on signing others’ names and Penal Code §470 on forgery.

3. Community and Official Reactions:

• Residents tied to the names being forged expressed concern over ballots being sent to addresses where the named voters no longer reside.

• The Trump White House responded, highlighting the seriousness of the allegations and commending the investigation efforts.

• Local officials, including California's Attorney General and the Los Angeles District Attorney, announced investigations into the alleged fraud.

4. Systemic Election Integrity Issues:

• This investigation follows previous findings of potential widespread election violations in California, such as outdated voter rolls and lax oversight of signature-gathering.

• Republican candidates in California have underscored the need for urgent reforms to restore integrity to the electoral process.

5. Ongoing Coverage:

• OMG plans to release more footage and information related to this investigation in the upcoming weeks, continuing to address issues around election integrity in California.

• The California Globe has pledged to keep its audience updated on responses from state and local authorities regarding the investigation.

The revelations from the O’Keefe Media Group’s investigation raise serious concerns about election fraud and the exploitation of vulnerable populations in California. The legal implications and calls for accountability highlight the urgent need for comprehensive reforms to ensure the integrity of the electoral process in the state. The situation is evolving, and further disclosures are anticipated in the near future. 

https://californiaglobe.com/fl/breaking-okeefe-media-group-undercover-investigation-exposes-massive-election-fraud-on-la-skid-row/