Rep. Nancy Mace Says She’s “Ready to Denaturalize and Deport” Ilhan Omar After Burying Her in Catfight on X: “What Was it Like Being Married to Your Brother?”

 An intense confrontation occurred between Rep. Nancy Mace and Rep. Ilhan Omar after U. S. military strikes on Iran. Mace publicly criticized Omar and called for her deportation, leading to a back-and-forth exchange on social media.

• Rep. Nancy Mace confronted Ilhan Omar following U. S. strikes on Iran. Mace responded to Omar's criticism regarding the timing of the attacks, which coincided with Ramadan, saying she doesn't care about the religious implications.

• Mace stated, "I'm ready to denaturalize and deport her to Somalia," escalating the conflict while discussing the military action.

• The exchange intensified when Mace mocked Omar and her colleague Rashida Tlaib, offering them "thoughts and prayers" over the death of an Iranian leader.

• In response, Omar accused Mace of being drunk and advised her to stay off social media when intoxicated, expressing that Mace's actions were disrespectful.

• Mace further provoked Omar by bringing up her controversial marriage to her brother, implying it was for immigration fraud, directly asking, "What was it like being married to your brother? "

The conflict highlights the ongoing tensions between the two representatives, with Mace aggressively defending U. S. military actions and taking jabs at Omar's background, while Omar retaliated by questioning Mace's alcohol consumption and behavior. The interactions reflect a broader political divide and the contentious nature of current political discourse. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/03/epic-rep-nancy-mace-eviscerates-ilhan-omar/

New Yorkers Voted for Mamdani’s 'Affordability;' Now They Pay the Price

 New York City's recent political changes under Mayor Zohran Mamdani highlight the challenges of affordability amidst rising costs and economic strain. His campaign promises, rooted in leftist economics, are now facing scrutiny as the realities of higher taxes and expenses emerge.

1. Cost of Living in New York City:

• A six-figure salary in Manhattan, once a sign of financial security, now offers limited purchasing power, averaging about $30,362 after taxes due to high living costs.

• Expenses in the city exceed national averages significantly, particularly housing, which is 402.8% higher than the norm, with rents ranging from $4,700 to $5,524 monthly.

2. Campaign Promises of Affordability:

• Mamdani's mayoral campaign centered around increasing affordability through measures like free public transport, universal childcare, and increased taxes on high earners and corporations.

• He proposed a 2% tax on incomes over $1 million to finance his agenda, portraying it as a way to improve the city without burdening average residents.

3. Impact of Tax Policies:

• Despite promising to tax the rich to alleviate costs for ordinary citizens, early reports following his election suggest the ultimate burden might fall on middle-class families through increased property taxes.

• Mamdani's proposed budget for fiscal year 2027 aims to address a significant deficit with either higher taxes on wealthy individuals and corporations or a property tax increase affecting millions of homeowners and renters.

4. Voter Consequences:

• Many of the neighborhoods that voted for Mamdani's affordability platform may now be facing the reality of increased property taxes and living costs.

• Analysis suggests that the promised benefits of taxing the wealthy could lead to indirect costs that affect the middle class, contradicting the initial intentions of affordability.

The example of New York City's economic conditions under Mamdani illustrates how well-intentioned political platforms can lead to unintended financial consequences for voters. The promise of affordability through tax increases is not without its pitfalls; residents are beginning to face higher costs despite hopes for relief. This serves as a cautionary tale for voters elsewhere, emphasizing the importance of scrutinizing policies proposed to address economic challenges. Economic solutions require sustainable growth and efficient governance, rather than solely relying on redistributive tax policies. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/03/new_yorkers_voted_for_mamdani_s_affordability_now_they_pay_the_price.html

Democrat super lawyer behind Russia collusion dossier now sees Iran interference intel as ‘big lie’

 The response from various Democratic figures regarding alleged Iranian interference in the U. S. elections of 2020 and 2024. It critiques Marc Elias, a lawyer associated with the Clinton campaign, for dismissing claims of Iranian election meddling while he previously promoted baseless accusations against Trump.

1. Background on Marc Elias:

• Marc Elias was a pivotal figure in the 2016 Clinton campaign, helping fund the controversial Steele dossier, which alleged collusion between Trump and Russia.

• Following multiple investigations that discredited those claims, Elias now labels Iranian influence in U. S. elections as a “Big Lie.”

2. Iranian Interference in Elections:

• Reports indicate that Iran sought to undermine Trump's candidacies in both the 2020 and 2024 elections through various forms of interference.

• Intelligence agencies, including the Biden Administration, have acknowledged these efforts, which included cyber operations and misinformation campaigns.

3. Political Reactions:

• Elias and other Democrats quickly refuted claims concerning Iranian meddling, suggesting it would be leveraged by Trump to gain undue political power.

• Trump's social media posts linking Iranian actions with interference sparked a rebuttal from various Democratic commentators, labeling these claims as conspiracy theories without substantial evidence.

4. Details of Iranian Tactics:

• In 2020, Iranian efforts included sending threatening emails impersonating the Proud Boys aimed at voter intimidation.

• The 2024 election saw similar Iranian campaigns of disinformation aimed specifically against Trump's campaign, including cyberattacks and leaked documents.

5. Recent Developments:

• As tensions escalated, Trump announced military actions against Iran, heightening the debate on election interference and national security.

• Multiple reports highlight ongoing Iranian attempts to influence American political outcomes, including potential assassination plots aimed at Trump.

6. Democratic Denials:

• Prominent Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, have downplayed Iranian efforts in favor of focusing on Russia's involvement.

• Elias's history and current denials reflect a broader pattern where Democrats prefer to reject the narrative of Iranian influence despite mounting evidence from intelligence agencies.

The discussion encapsulates a significant tension in American politics, especially as it concerns foreign influence in elections. The contrasting narratives between Republicans and Democrats over Iran's influence and Elias's actions serve to illustrate the complex interplay between electoral integrity, national security, and political strategy in contemporary U. S. politics. 

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/steele-dossier-pusher-marc-elias-claims-irans-anti-trump-efforts-2020-and

Marco Rubio and America Alone

 Marco Rubio’s recent speech at the Munich Security Conference has drawn attention for its insights into America’s role in Western civilization. While he received praise for his delivery and content, there are critical distinctions in his understanding of the historical and philosophical foundations of the West that need to be addressed.

1. Praise for Rubio’s Address:

• Many conservatives and independents found Rubio's remarks compelling and knowledgeable.

• His speech effectively articulated the significance of Western civilization and America's leadership role.

2. Misconceptions of the Enlightenment:

• Rubio mistakenly presents the Enlightenment as a uniform movement.

• The Enlightenment is more accurately divided into four distinct segments: English, French, Scottish, and German. Each had different focuses—some on reform and gradual change, while others promoted radical ideas.

3. Historical Roots of Liberty:

• Rubio claims that the “seeds of liberty” originated in Europe, but they were actually planted much earlier in ancient Israel.

• The English and Scottish Enlightenments, key to the American Revolution, built upon these ancient ideas. They did not entirely break from earlier moral foundations.

4. Contrast with Continental Thought:

• On the continent, Rousseau's philosophies significantly diverged from the Enlightenment ideals held by the American Founders.

• Rousseau's view of the state and “general will” has been instrumental in shaping leftist ideologies over the past 250 years.

5. Modern Implications:

• Current political figures, like Emmanuel Macron and Keir Starmer, reflect Rousseau's influence rather than traditional Western values, showcasing a disconnect with the original ideas that shaped America.

• This led to the conclusion that despite some cultural similarities, the historical and philosophical paths of America and Europe now widely differ.

6. America's Position:

• The unity once shared between Europe and the U. S. is now fragile, with a common vision nearly non-existent.

• Efforts for reconciliation with Europe must occur on terms favorable to America to protect its foundational principles.

Rubio’s speech highlights the critical role America plays as a defender of Western civilization. However, understanding the complex historical, philosophical, and cultural differences between America and Europe is vital. While striving for harmony is admirable, it is crucial that this effort respects America's unique values and heritage. Ultimately, America stands alone in preserving the core principles of Western civilization, as the traditional foundations have eroded in Europe. 

https://amgreatness.com/2026/03/02/marco-rubio-and-america-alone/

Khamenei, Haman, and a Purim for the Ages

 On the evening of Purim, a Jewish holiday that commemorates a significant biblical triumph, the current Iranian leader, Ali Khamenei, met his end due to a joint attack by Israeli and American forces. This article draws parallels between Khamenei and the biblical antagonist Haman, illustrating how both faced downfall due to their overreach and strategic blunders.

• Purim celebrates the historical victory of Esther and Mordecai over Haman, who sought to destroy the Jews in Persia 2,500 years ago.

• Khamenei, likened to Haman, was killed during a military offensive on October 6, 2023, after building a significant power base in Iran and aggressively threatening Israel and the U. S.

• Celebrated successes by both Haman and Khamenei were marred by their underestimations of their opponents—Khamenei misjudged Israel's resolve and capabilities.

• Israel launched effective counter-attacks against Iranian and allied forces, demonstrating superior strategic planning, intelligence, and military execution.

• The longstanding alliance between Israel and the U. S. significantly influences the Middle Eastern power dynamics, with American support proving crucial for Israeli operations.

• The new leaders in Iran must learn from Khamenei's mistakes or risk further conflict, depending on their willingness to negotiate and present concessions.

Khamenei’s demise signals a shift in power dynamics within the region, echoing the lessons of historical narratives like that of Purim. As Israel continues its military actions, there is anticipation that Iran's future leadership could decide to end hostilities or face severe consequences, potentially altering the landscape for everyday Iranians seeking peace. 

https://freebeacon.com/columns/khamenei-haman-and-a-purim-for-the-ages/

The Democrats’ Epic Fury Over Iran Strikes

 David Catron discusses the fierce criticism from Democrats concerning President Trump’s decision to target Iran, which involved the removal of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The article examines the contrasting responses of political figures to this military action and explores the implications of their statements.

1. Democratic Condemnation: Many Democratic politicians, including Senator Tammy Duckworth, have condemned Trump's military action in Iran, framing it as an unconstitutional act that could lead to further conflict without a clear strategy.

2. Iranians' Reaction Ignored: The article highlights that Democrats tend to overlook the positive reaction among some Iranians towards Khamenei’s downfall, showcasing a disconnect between their rhetoric and the realities in Iran.

3. Historical Context: Catron argues that Democrats are inconsistent in their stance towards military actions, referencing former Presidents Obama and Biden, who similarly took unilateral military actions under claims of national security.

4. War Powers Act Discussion: Senator John Fetterman mentions the War Powers Act, stating that past presidents, including Democrats, have asserted the right to use military force without prior Congressional approval, thus contrasting the current criticism from Democratic lawmakers.

5. Political Motivations: Catron suggests that the Democrats’ outrage is politically motivated, aimed at positioning themselves against Trump rather than a principled stand on foreign policy.

6. Calls for Congressional Action: Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, along with Senator Rand Paul, are mentioned as key figures pushing for Congressional votes on military actions against Iran, arguing that such actions require legislative approval.

The article critiques the Democratic response to President Trump's military action in Iran, indicating that their objections are often hypocritical and politically driven rather than grounded in solid constitutional principles. Catron contends that both history and law suggest Trump acted within his rights, while Democrats are focused on leveraging the situation for political gain rather than genuinely advocating for the American public's interest in peace and stability. 

https://spectator.org/the-democrats-epic-fury-over-iran-strikes/

How America outsourced the materials of modern power—and what it will take to get them back

 America's reliance on rare-earth elements, crucial for modern technology and defense. It details the history of the Mountain Pass mine in California, the changing dynamics of global rare-earth production, particularly China's dominant role, and the challenges America faces in regaining independence in this sector.

1. Importance of Rare Earths: Rare-earth elements are essential for various technologies, from electric vehicles to military equipment. They enable advancements in electric motors, screens, communications, and more.

2. U. S. Dependence on China: America once led in rare-earth production, but today, China handles around 70% of global mining and over 90% of refining. This shift occurred as tighter U. S. environmental regulations and lower costs in China led to the closure of American mines.

3. Current Production Status: The Mountain Pass mine, which reopened in 2018, produces about 10% of the world's rare-earth supply. However, much of the refined material is still sent to China for processing.

4. Geopolitical Tensions: Recent U. S.-China trade tensions have led Beijing to restrict exports of rare-earth materials to America, which threatens supply chains and has prompted questions about national security.

5. Environmental Regulations: Stricter U. S. regulations on mining have created obstacles for developing new mines. The permitting process can take nearly three decades, which dissuades investments and operations.

6. China’s Strategy: China has strategically invested in its rare-earth industry since the 1980s, providing subsidized loans and easing environmental standards to drive costs down and dominate the market.

7. The Role of U. S. Policy: The U. S. government has started to take action by investing in domestic mining operations. This includes purchasing stakes in companies involved in rare-earth production and signing agreements with countries like Australia to enhance cooperation in critical minerals.

8. Alternative Solutions and Innovations: Efforts are underway to develop substitutes for rare-earth elements and to streamline mining processes to reduce dependency on China. Various projects are also being proposed to establish new mines and processing facilities.

9. Need for Reforms: Addressing the challenges in the mining and refining sectors calls for reforming and streamlining permitting processes, improving legal frameworks to expedite approvals, and establishing strategic partnerships with allied nations.

10. Future Implications: The U. S. must balance government intervention with market-driven solutions to reduce dependency on China's rare-earth supplies while avoiding the pitfalls of state capitalism.

The article emphasizes the critical nature of rare-earth elements in modern society and the need for the U. S. to strengthen its own supply chains. As reliance on China becomes increasingly uncomfortable, there is a pressing need for policy reforms and innovations that could help the U. S. regain its footing in rare-earth production and reduce geopolitical vulnerabilities. By fostering a more competitive environment, the U. S. can encourage private investments while ensuring that strategic interests are met without becoming overly reliant on governmental control or intervention. The ongoing developments in this sector will significantly influence America's future technological and economic landscape. 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/rare-earth-elements-metals-technology-china