Chinese Spies Built Secret Nuclear War Backchannel Between Former U.S. Military Chiefs And Blacklisted Chinese Weapons Research Center.

 A private nuclear backchannel funded by a Chinese organization has connected former high-ranking U.S. national security officials with researchers from a blacklisted Chinese nuclear weapons institution. This channel, built over time, has facilitated discussions on sensitive nuclear policies and strategies that have raised security concerns in the U.S.

1. Formation of the Backchannel:

The China United States Exchange Foundation (CUSEF), linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), financed meetings between former U.S. officials and the China Academy of Engineering Physics (CAEP), responsible for China's nuclear weapons development.

The U.S. Commerce Department has blacklisted CAEP since 1997 due to its involvement in nuclear weapons research.

2. Participants:

Key U.S. participants included prominent figures such as:

Adm. Mike Mullen (former Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff)

Ernest Moniz (former U.S. Secretary of Energy)

Sam Nunn (former Senate Armed Services Chairman)

Stephen Biegun (former Deputy Secretary of State)

These individuals brought significant experience and connections, enhancing the credibility of the backchannel.

3. Evolution of Discussions:

Initial meetings began in September 2024, dealing with U.S.-China strategic stability and nuclear policy.

By October 2024, discussions advanced to nuclear command and control and risk management of nuclear weapons.

The agenda of meetings grew more sensitive, inviting interactions with senior Chinese officials from the government and military.

4. High-Level Engagements:

April 2025 marked a major meeting led by prominent U.S. officials, discussing nuclear strategy and U.S.-China crises.

By October 2025, discussions included CAEP researchers, covering global nuclear posture and diplomatic strategies.

5. Strategic Intentions:

CUSEF's activities align with China's United Front strategy, aiming to influence American policy and minimize opposition to the CCP.

The backchannel served as a platform for sowing trust through controlled interactions between high-profile former officials and Chinese counterparts.

6. Corporate Interests:

Several participants had connections with corporations deeply engaged in business with China, such as General Motors and Ford, increasing their vested interests in positive U.S.-China relations.

For instance, Adm. Mullen, while serving on GM’s board, promoted closer military relations with China, reflecting possible conflicts of interest.

7. Implications of the Backchannel:

The covert nature of these discussions raises concerns about U.S. security and the integrity of governmental diplomacy.

The operations aimed not just at dialogue but potentially to shape official policy discussions in favor of a more favorable stance towards China.

The establishment of a nuclear backchannel involving former U.S. officials and Chinese researchers signifies a complex interaction shaped by influence from the Chinese government. It reflects a strategy of fostering communication while simultaneously risking the integrity of U.S. national security through deep ties with former officials and their corporate interests. 

https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/exc-chinese-spies-built-secret-nuclear?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=3382126&post_id=210344693&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Fake It ‘Til You Make It – The Dems’ New Campaign Motto

The editorial discusses perceived dishonesty among Democratic politicians, suggesting a pattern of presenting false or exaggerated images of themselves to connect with voters. It highlights several recent examples to support this claim.

Disguised Political Supporters: Recently, a group named "Republicans for Talarico" was found to be composed of longtime Democrats, leading to criticism from Republican leaders. This situation raises questions about authenticity in political endorsements.

Questionable Claims of Politicians:

Talarico's Campaign: Allegations of false representations surrounding Talarico's background and beliefs have surfaced.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: AOC is criticized for attempting to downplay her association with extreme views by indicating her past remarks were influenced by pandemic conditions while laughing off her affiliations with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA).

Critique of the DSA: The editorial argues that the DSA is primarily composed of educated, affluent individuals who do not represent the working class, contrary to its claims.

Other Examples of Deception: The piece lists various politicians, like Zohran Mamdani and Abdul El-Sayed, who allegedly misrepresent their backgrounds for political gain. For instance, Mamdani portrays himself as a child of humble beginnings, while El-Sayed claims to be a physician despite lacking the required credentials.

Exaggerations Among Leaders: Minnesota Governor Tim Walz is criticized for allegedly lying about career achievements and personal experiences. The editorial mentions his attempts to embellish his history as a coach and firearm user.

Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton: References are made to both politicians for allegedly adjusting their personas to appear more relatable to ordinary voters, including Harris's fluctuating accents and Clinton's debatable claims to local culture.

Comparative Analysis: The piece acknowledges that some Republicans have also doctored their resumes but emphasizes that faking identities seems to be a more prevalent issue among Democrats, who are viewed as primarily focused on securing government power at any cost.

The editorial posits that Democrats often resort to deception to gain favor with voters, portraying a disconnect with average Americans. The I&I Editorial Board suggests that the trend of insincerity among Democratic politicians may be a strategic choice to retain political power, raising concerns about their genuine commitment to representing the public.

https://issuesinsights.com/2026/08/13/fake-it-til-you-make-it-the-dems-new-campaign-motto/

The Problem With DSA Democrats Isn’t Socialism, It’s Third-Worldism

The implications of mass immigration from Muslim-majority countries on American politics, particularly within the Democratic Party. It argues that this trend has led to a shift in political affiliations and voting patterns driven by tribal and ethnic identities rather than traditional political ideologies.

1. Shift in Political Labels:

Many commentators criticize Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) members as "socialists" or "communists," but younger voters do not respond negatively to these labels.

The idea that such labels will deter voters is seen as outdated, as socialism is no longer viewed negatively by significant parts of the population.

2. Cultural vs. Ideological Voting Patterns:

The article argues that the true issue with DSA supporters is not their socialist beliefs but their tribal voting behavior influenced by a large influx of immigrants from the Third World.

Many of these immigrants prioritize ethnic or religious identity over broader political ideologies.

3. Case Study of Voting Behavior:

An exit poll during Michigan’s Democratic Senate primary showed that while non-Arab voters were split between candidates, 94% of Arab voters chose Abdul El-Sayed, highlighting identity-driven voting patterns.

4. Historical Context:

Previous immigrant communities historically voted along ethnic lines, but the current situation, fueled by recent mass immigration, shows a greater divide in priorities and values.

Political dynamics are changing as urban centers are influenced increasingly by immigrant populations.

5. Impact on Governance:

The article compares the emerging political landscape in the U.S. to the "Ottoman millet system," suggesting that different ethnic groups may soon demand separate governance structures and rights.

Instances of public policy that advance the interests of specific immigrant communities are highlighted, such as a proposed “Muslim Commission” in Massachusetts.

6. Tribalism in Politics:

Tribal loyalty is emphasized, where voters may support policies that benefit their communities, often without regard for broader fiscal responsibility or societal impact.

Fraudulent behavior within immigrant groups, justified as benefiting their ethnic community, is discussed as a normalization of certain unethical practices.

7. International Comparisons:

The article cites the evolution of British politics, where large Muslim populations influence local governance and political representation, altering traditional party dynamics.

Potential parallels are drawn to the U.S. landscape, suggesting that similar developments could emerge if Third World immigration continues unchecked.

8. Future Predictions:

The author predicts that, without significant policy changes, American political dynamics will evolve into various factions based on ethnic or religious allegiance.

This could lead to the establishment of political parties explicitly representing the interests of Muslim and other immigrant communities.

The article concludes with a strong assertion that without reducing immigration from the Third World, the political landscape in the U.S. may increasingly reflect the tribal instincts of various immigrant communities rather than a cohesive national identity. The rise of DSA-type politics reflects this shift, where ethnic and tribal loyalties increasingly dictate political affiliations and community priorities, leading to potential fragmentation of American political discourse. 

https://thefederalist.com/2026/08/12/the-problem-with-dsa-democrats-isnt-socialism-its-third-worldism/

Inside the FBI's two-tiered approach of attack: Aggressive on Trump, protective on Biden

 The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has been accused of applying double standards in its investigative approaches toward two presidential candidates, Donald Trump and Joe Biden. Investigations conducted prior to the 2020 election have prompted concerns about bias and accountability.

1. Doubling Down on Trump:

The FBI initiated two significant investigations, Crossfire Hurricane and Oxferd Comma, aimed at damaging Trump. These investigations relied on unverified allegations that Trump colluded with Russia, primarily promoted by the Clinton campaign.

Crossfire Hurricane involved unauthorized surveillance under the Obama administration, leading to misconduct by FBI officials, including the falsification of evidence to secure warrants.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller ultimately found no evidence of collusion between Trump's campaign and Russia, and a subsequent report confirmed the FBI had no basis for starting this investigation.

2. Protective Measures for Biden:

In contrast, an operation named Round River sought to counter accusations of corruption regarding Biden and his family. Despite having informants with information about alleged corruption, the FBI labeled these concerns as Russian disinformation and dismissed those who brought them up as conspiracy theorists.

Various agencies and media collaborated to protect Biden's candidacy. A letter signed by former intelligence officials falsely claimed a report about Hunter Biden’s laptop was part of a Russian campaign to influence the election, which was coordinated with the Biden campaign.

3. Suppression of Information:

Leading up to the 2020 election, social media platforms, influenced by the FBI's directives, censored the story about Hunter Biden’s laptop. This censorship was later acknowledged by former executives of Twitter as being a mistake.

An environment was created where legitimate concerns about Biden’s activities were silenced while aggressive investigations were conducted against Trump without substantial evidence.

4. Lack of Accountability:

No serious consequences have been faced by individuals in the FBI or other involved agencies for the perceived misconduct and bias shown in the investigations against Trump and Biden.

The differentiation in how the FBI conducted its investigations into Trump and Biden has raised significant questions about ethical standards in federal law enforcement. While Trump was aggressively pursued based on questionable allegations, Biden was reportedly shielded from scrutiny despite credible claims of corruption. This situation reflects broader concerns about the integrity of federal investigations and has implications for political accountability moving forward.

https://justthenews.com/index%2Ephp/government/federal-agencies/inside-fbis-two-track-approach-aggressive-trump-protective-biden

The ‘Wrenching Transformation’ Of Our Suburbs

The significant changes occurring in suburbs like Menlo Park, California, where high-density housing projects are replacing traditional community spaces. The author argues that these developments, aimed at addressing climate change and housing shortages, are harming local businesses and altering the character of these communities.

Menlo Park, known for its small-town feel, faces plans to convert popular parking areas into high-rise subsidized housing. This could threaten the viability of small local businesses.

The construction of these housing units is predicted to disrupt the community, with many businesses likely closing due to the construction process and the influx of new residents.

There is widespread concern among locals about the rapid transformation of their neighborhoods, leading to organized civic action, including a ballot measure set for an upcoming election.

The push for high-density housing is presented as a solution to a housing crisis while many people are actually leaving California. Only an increase in undocumented immigrants is noted, contrary to the supposed need for more housing.

Developers are incentivized to build these large projects by being offered significant benefits for adding affordable housing units, which may not genuinely serve the community’s needs.

The article critiques state policies and planning initiatives like Plan Bay Area, which allegedly impose a uniform approach to urbanization across the region, disregarding community uniqueness.

Critics assert that the underlying motives for such developments relate to a broader agenda of social engineering through urbanization, likening it to communist ideals of centralized governance and control over living spaces.

The author warns that these changes in suburban landscapes are part of a greater trend affecting not just California but could potentially transform communities nationwide.

The article calls for local and national resistance to the dramatic urban changes threatening suburban America, suggesting that losing these communities equates to losing the American Dream. The author highlights the urgency of fighting against these developments to protect local identities and the characteristics that make suburbs desirable places to live. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/08/the-wrenching-transformation-of-our-suburbs/

Poor Francesca Hong, a Victim of Milwaukee’s Missing Election Results

The Wisconsin gubernatorial primary recently faced significant controversy surrounding the election results, especially the narrow loss of candidate Francesca Hong to David Crowley. Missing election data from USB sticks raised questions about the integrity of the electoral process, leading to accusations of election manipulation.

1. Election Results: David Crowley won the primary with 39.8% of the vote, narrowly defeating Francesca Hong, who secured 39.4%. Polling had previously suggested Hong was the favorite.

2. Missing Data: Five USB sticks containing crucial voting data were missing on election night. Election officials reported needing to retrieve results from an absentee facility as a result of this missing data.

3. Election Official’s Errors: Officials, including Milwaukee’s election chief, Paulina Gutierrez, explained that the missing results stemmed from operators clicking the wrong buttons on tabulators, leading to a rapid yet incomplete download of election data.

4. Reactions to Irregularities: Prominent election analyst Steve Kornacki was shocked by the situation, as media coverage highlighted the strangeness of multiple USB drives failing to provide data, raising suspicions among observers.

5. Accusations of Vote Theft: Critics, including Scott McKay, argue that the inconsistencies in the voting process indicate a deliberate theft of the election from Hong in favor of Crowley. Discussion of “rigging” resonates with historical concerns surrounding primary elections within the Democratic Party.

6. Political Context: Crowley’s unexpected victory is tied to broader implications for the Democratic Party. With claims of compromised election integrity, party insiders face backlash, especially from those who supported Hong.

7. Future Implications: The controversy may damage Crowley’s chances in the general election, depending on how Hong’s supporters react to the perceived injustice during the primary. The incident raises ongoing questions about election reliability in Wisconsin.

8. Francesca Hong’s Position: Despite the setback, there is encouragement for Hong to retry in future elections. As a candidate who faced manipulation from party insiders, her experience highlights the challenges within the political landscape.

The mishandling of election results in the Wisconsin primary has sparked heated debates concerning electoral integrity. With accusations of vote theft and political maneuvering, the case of Francesca Hong serves as a critical reminder of the vulnerabilities within party primaries. The unfolding dynamics will continue to impact electoral confidence and future political strategies within the state. 

https://spectator.org/poor-francesca-hong-a-victim-of-milwaukees-missing-election-results/

How to Destroy a State, in Five Easy Steps

Jason S. Miyares discusses the decline of Virginia's progress under Democratic governance, particularly focusing on the actions of Governor Abigail Spanberger. Miyares outlines how Democrats have reversed the state’s economic improvements through various policies.

1. Past Achievements: Under Governor Glenn Youngkin (2022-2026), Virginia improved its job creation ranking from 46th to one of the top five states, marked by fiscal responsibility and budget surpluses. The murder rate decreased, and drug overdose deaths also fell due to new initiatives.

2. Current Political Climate: Spanberger's administration has quickly shifted away from the previous achievements. Miyares accuses her of implementing detrimental policies, leading her to become one of the least popular governors in Virginia’s history.

3. Policies in Action:

Tax Increases: Spanberger’s team proposed over $37 billion in new taxes despite a fiscal surplus, including payroll and carbon taxes that could stifle business growth.

Energy Tax Policies: The administration is focusing on green energy but is criticized for neglecting reliable energy sources like natural gas and nuclear power.

Criminal Justice Changes: A program allowing early release for criminals has led to high rates of re-offending, while cooperation with federal law enforcement on deportations of violent offenders has ended, increasing public safety risks.

Labor Regulations: Efforts to abolish right-to-work laws and enforce collective bargaining could lead to increased costs for local governments and taxpayers.

Gerrymandering Efforts: Spanberger has proposed a partisan gerrymander that undermines nonpartisan redistricting reforms, leading to legal challenges.

Miyares asserts that the recent Democratic policies threaten to undo Virginia’s economic and social progress. He warns that this could lead to businesses and families leaving the state, affecting Virginia's future as voters respond to these changes. The ongoing conflict between elected officials and the interests of Virginia residents will likely determine the state's direction in upcoming elections. 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/abigail-spanberger-virginia-glenn-youngkin