Senate GOP Breaks for Vacation, Delays Reconciliation Vote to Fund ICE – Thune Admits It’s Political Hit Against President Trump

The Senate Republicans have postponed the vote on a reconciliation package meant to fund ICE (U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and Border Patrol. Majority Leader John Thune has acknowledged that this decision is politically motivated, specifically targeting former President Trump.

• Vacation and Delay: The Senate Republicans are on recess until June, delaying the crucial reconciliation vote intended for funding ICE and Border Patrol.

• Political Admission: Thune admitted the delay is a political maneuver against Trump. He stated that the decision is influenced by the current political climate and Trump's recent endorsements and snubs of Senate Republicans.

• Reconciliation Package Issues: The Senate's proposed $72 billion reconciliation package faced setbacks after the Senate Parliamentarian struck down key provisions. Senators expressed concerns over included funding for the Secret Service, which further complicated the proposal.

• Justice Department Fund: The delay is also linked to disagreements over the Department of Justice's new “anti-weaponization” fund, which has been criticized by some Republicans.

• House of Representatives: The House had already passed a funding package for the Department of Homeland Security, but the Senate plans to revisit the funding for ICE and Border Patrol separately.

The Senate GOP's decision to delay the reconciliation vote on ICE funding not only leaves key immigration agencies unfunded but also signals the intertwining of political strategy with legislative decisions. The upcoming recess will prolong this uncertainty regarding immigration funding until the Senate reconvenes in June. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/05/senate-gop-breaks-vacation-delays-reconciliation-vote-fund/

Authoritarianism Doesn’t Arrive With a Coup. It Arrives With a Login

Sam Lowry's article discusses the gradual shift toward authoritarianism in Britain, illustrating how increasing regulations and compliance measures subtly erode personal freedoms without overtly appearing tyrannical. Lowry emphasizes that this shift does not occur through sudden events like coups but rather through incremental and seemingly reasonable policy changes that restrict individual rights and freedoms.

The Nature of Authoritarianism

• Authoritarianism often creeps in slowly, unnoticed by many.

• It manifests through compliance forms, property regulations, and fines for minor infractions.

• The focus has shifted from overt political control to the management of everyday life via bureaucratic measures.

Housing Regulations

• Starting in 2030, landlords in Britain must comply with energy performance standards, making many properties unlettable due to government regulations rather than structural issues.

• Proposed future measures could extend such standards to owner-occupied homes, controlling the sale and mortgage processes.

• Local regulations include hefty fines for burning certain fuels or even keeping livestock like chickens without registration, creating financial burdens for non-compliance.

Control Over Consumption

• The government is mandating a rapid transition to electric vehicles, imposing costs on those unable to afford such changes.

• Numerous regulations target food and drink, altering products without accountability for potential health effects.

• Alcohol and tobacco laws restrict sales and consumption based on government policies, reflecting a broader trend of the state influencing personal lifestyle choices without public consent.

Restrictions on Speech

• While Britain lacks formal censorship laws, recent legislations impose strict regulations on speech, particularly in employment settings.

• The Online Safety Act enables regulators to remove online content deemed harmful, stifling free speech.

• There's increased policing of social media, leading to frequent arrests for innocuous posts, indicating a troubling trend toward criminalizing free expression.

Surveillance and Trust in Government

• The government has ramped up surveillance, including facial recognition technologies and retention of internet browsing histories, often without public consent.

• Public trust in key institutions has eroded due to perceived bias and politicization, reflecting a broader crisis of confidence in the rule of law and democratic processes.

Political Targeting and Selective Enforcement

• The article highlights how political figures such as Nigel Farage face intensified scrutiny and punitive actions under dubious legal justifications, showing a pattern of selectively enforcing laws against political opponents.

• Surveys indicate fear among teenagers of expressing political opinions, underscoring a culture of silence rather than open debate.

Legislative Overreach

• Recent legislative moves align UK laws with EU regulations, reversing Brexit gains and prompting concerns over sovereignty without public input.

• The government has attempted to extend electoral terms without proper public authorization, hinting at a disregard for democratic processes.

The Role of Political Parties

• Both major political parties—Labour and Conservative—are implicated in building the framework for increased state control, suggesting that such a power grab transcends party lines.

• The author argues that the machinery of the state for managing citizens has become the default approach, regardless of which party is in power.

Lowry warns that democratic freedoms are not lost in single dramatic episodes, but through a series of rationalized rules. The erosion of personal liberties in Britain reflects a broader trend of increasing state control over everyday life driven by compliance and surveillance rather than overt authoritarian measures. Recovery of these freedoms will depend on public awareness and recognition of what is at stake before the existing system becomes too entrenched to change. Therefore, a concerted effort is needed to reclaim personal liberties and uphold democratic principles. 

https://dailysceptic.org/2026/05/20/authoritarianism-doesnt-arrive-with-a-coup-it-arrives-with-a-login/

Reparations: Who Pays Whom?

The complex issue of reparations, particularly focusing on the debate regarding payments from white Americans to black Americans in recognition of slavery and its lasting impacts. The author raises practical questions about who should pay reparations and the fairness of such payments.

• Historical Context: Advocates for reparations argue that white Americans owe payments to black Americans for the injustices of slavery, which ended 163 years ago.

• Practical Payment Questions: The article argues that since only about 4% of American households owned slaves in 1860, the vast majority of Americans today should not be financially liable. It questions if descendants of slaveholders or non-slaveholders should pay reparations.

• Complex Ancestry: There are complications about who qualifies for reparations. Not all black Americans are descendants of slaves, and some may even be descendants of slaveholders or belong to groups that were also enslaved, such as Native Americans.

• Global Context: The article suggests that reparations should not just be considered within the U. S. context. It raises questions about the accountability of slave traders from England and African communities that participated in slavery.

• Racial Identity and Reparations: The author questions how one should determine if a person qualifies as black for reparations and what percentage of black ancestry is necessary.

• Current Socioeconomic Status: The article posits that any economic disparities linked to slavery have largely been addressed through policies like affirmative action over the past decades. The argument is made that America has made efforts to level the playing field for black Americans.

• Theoretical Financial Estimation: The piece humorously suggests calculating reparations based on the income difference between black Americans and what they might have earned had slavery not existed, implying it could lead to absurd conclusions.

The article concludes that many complexities regarding reparations remain unresolved and questions the fairness and logic of implementing such a policy today. The author states that any financial obligations owed should consider historical context, individual circumstances, and the current societal framework. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/05/reparations_who_pays_whom.html

Illegals Are Killing America

 The serious issue of violent crimes committed by illegal immigrants in America, highlighting specific tragic incidents and calling for stronger immigration enforcement measures.

1. Recent Violent Crimes:

• A 51-year-old woman was murdered by Rolbert Joachin, an illegal Haitian immigrant, in Ft. Myers, Florida. This incident was shocking and gained attention from President Trump.

• In Virginia, Stephanie Minter, 41, was stabbed to death by Abdul Jalloh, an illegal immigrant with a significant criminal history. Virginia's Governor Abigail Spanberger signed an executive order that may hinder police cooperation with ICE, further complicating deportations.

2. Response from Officials:

• President Trump criticized the leniency shown by liberal judges who repeatedly release dangerous criminals instead of deporting them.

• There is a noted frustration with state officials who oppose collaboration with federal immigration authorities (ICE), undermining efforts to detain and deport serious offenders.

3. Calls to Action:

• The article emphasizes the urgent need to support ICE in removing criminals from the country, arguing that failure to do so endangers citizens.

• It suggests that political leaders who resist these actions may be contributing to ongoing violence and crime in the nation.

4. Impact of Illegal Immigration on Public Safety:

• The text posits that crimes committed by illegal aliens are significant and constitute a growing threat. It argues that these crimes could potentially be prevented with better immigration enforcement.

• The author believes that the number of murders could drastically decrease if violent illegal immigrants were detained or deported.

The violent acts discussed in the article serve as a wake-up call regarding the broader implications of illegal immigration on American society. The author argues that enhanced collaboration with ICE is essential for maintaining public safety and preventing further tragedies similar to those who lost their lives in Ft. Myers and Virginia. The necessity for political accountability and immigration reform is strongly emphasized.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/05/illegals_are_killing_america.html

More Voter Fraud Charges Scream For The Senate To Pass The SAVE America Act

A recent case has raised concerns regarding voter fraud in the U. S., involving a Canadian man living in Massachusetts who allegedly voted in multiple elections without being a U. S. citizen. This incident highlights ongoing debates about election integrity and the necessity for laws like the proposed SAVE America Act aimed at ensuring that only U. S. citizens can vote.

1. Charges Against Sunny Manhertz: Sunny Manhertz, a Canadian citizen residing in Saugus, Massachusetts, has been charged with voting unlawfully as a noncitizen. He allegedly registered to vote in federal elections for several years, including in 2008, and voted in elections up to 2024. Court documents assert that he falsely claimed to be a U. S. citizen on his voter registration form.

2. Possible Penalties: If convicted, Manhertz could face significant penalties, including up to five years in prison and fines up to $350,000. His case is being treated seriously by the Department of Justice, which emphasizes the legal importance of citizenship verification for voters.

3. Background on Citizenship: Manhertz has been a lawful permanent resident since 1987 but has never pursued U. S. citizenship. Despite knowing he was not a citizen, he continued to vote, indicating awareness of the laws against noncitizen voting.

4. Electoral Impact of Noncitizen Voting: This case is part of a broader narrative where similar incidents of noncitizen voting have been reported, notably in New Jersey and Alabama. Advocates for stricter voting laws argue that such incidents undermine electoral integrity and trust in the democratic process.

5. Political Reactions: Following this incident, there is increased pressure on lawmakers to pass the SAVE America Act. This proposed legislation, championed by former President Donald Trump, seeks to enforce strict identification requirements, including proof of citizenship to register and vote.

6. Voices for Election Integrity: Groups focused on election integrity, such as the Public Interest Legal Foundation, have highlighted the necessity for thorough vetting of voter rolls to eliminate noncitizen registrations. Critics argue that the current voter registration system is flawed and insufficient in preventing such abuses.

7. Resistance to Noncitizen Voting Proposals: In Massachusetts, proposals to extend voting rights to noncitizens have traditionally faced opposition, even among some Democrats. Local officials recognize the importance of citizenship with respect to voting rights and express concerns over maintaining public trust in the electoral system.

The case of Sunny Manhertz exemplifies ongoing issues related to voter fraud and noncitizen voting in the U. S. As calls for reform through measures like the SAVE America Act gain momentum, the need for clear identification protocols becomes increasingly important. This situation underscores the complex relationship between election laws, citizenship, and voter integrity in America. 

https://thefederalist.com/2026/05/21/more-voter-fraud-charges-scream-for-the-senate-to-pass-the-save-america-act/

News roundup:

 In apparent reversal, Trump says he’s sending 5,000 troops to Poland

SCOTUS ruling allows lawsuits over property seized by Cuban government

US diplomats undergoing divisive new review process

Why Trump’s AI executive order was pulled

GOP Rep. Burchett: ‘Both Parties, Somehow, It’s Acceptable’ to Be Antisemitic

Trump Calls to Make Daylight Saving Time ‘Permanent’

Exclusive: Chip Roy Issues Plan to Tax Illegal Aliens at 25% for Remittances

Financial Software Giant Intuit Lays Off 17% of Workforce as It Embraces AI

Senate Abandons Trump’s ICE, Border Funding Bill for Early Vacation; Thune Admits Paxton Endorsement Played Role

US arrests sister of powerful Cuban official over alleged ties to communist regime

Philadelphia pizza shop sells $55 slices topped with caviar, served on gold plate with keepsake spoon

Democrats revolt over ‘biological’ wording in women’s history museum bill

Singham Network mobilizes to defend Raul Castro and Communist Cuban policies after DOJ indictment

Chinese coffee giant rivaling Starbucks plots California takeover

Park Slope Food Coop under fire over anti-Jewish hostility ahead of Israel boycott vote

Democrats Skip Hearing On Billion-Dollar Fraud Scheme Uncovered By Daily Wire

The Soros Network Exposes its Jewish Front Groups

 The connections between various groups funded by the Soros network, which reportedly undermine the fight against anti-Semitism while promoting an anti-Israel agenda. It focuses on allegations that certain organizations portray themselves as defenders against anti-Semitism but are tied to groups that support it.

1. Soros Network Funding:

• The Open Society Foundations, led by George Soros and now his son Alex Soros, have reportedly funded organizations like Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor and the Nexus Project.

• Euro-Med has connections to Hamas, yet received over $2 million from Soros.

2. Public Relations Controversies:

• A false claim made by the New York Times about Israeli dogs was sourced from the Euro-Med group, leading to defense from the Nexus Project, which claims to combat anti-Semitism.

• Alex Soros has announced a $30 million fund to "fight Islamophobia and anti-Semitism," raising questions about the true intentions of these groups.

3. Anti-Israel Activities:

• Some groups, including Bend the Arc and the JCPA (Jewish Council for Public Affairs), are criticized for their opposition to Israel and failure to address anti-Semitism effectively.

• The JCPA, which has ties with the Soros network, has been accused of prioritizing criticism of Jewish safety measures while defending anti-Israel sentiments.

4. Misleading Philanthropy:

• Organizations within the Soros network are said to operate under the guise of fighting anti-Semitism while they support political movements that could empower anti-Israel perspectives.

• The coordinated appearance of these organizations diminishes their claims of representing the Jewish community.

5. Media Dynamics:

• The article claims that mainstream media has failed to adequately cover the funding and activities of these organizations, inadvertently allowing them to continue operating without challenge.

• The visibility of Alex Soros’ funding strategies might backfire, exposing the true nature of these groups as part of a wider agenda against Israel.

The connections between the Soros-funded groups and their alleged anti-Semitic agendas raise serious concerns about the representation of Jewish interests. The article emphasizes the need for awareness regarding the impact of these organizations on the Jewish community and the fight against anti-Semitism. It urges readers to critically evaluate the affiliations and claims of groups that present themselves as defenders of anti-Semitism while engaging in actions perceived as detrimental to Jewish safety and Israel's existence.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/the-soros-network-exposes-its-jewish-front-groups/