On her way out, DNI Tulsi Gabbard drops a bio-labs truth bomb on Mitt Romney and news media

In a significant development, former U. S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revealed that the United States has funded 120 biological labs in 30 countries, including Ukraine. This announcement comes after years of controversy regarding the potential risks associated with these labs, particularly concerning dangerous pathogens.

• Background Context: In 2022, Tulsi Gabbard raised concerns about U. S. funding of bio-research labs abroad, specifically in Ukraine. She faced criticism from politicians like Mitt Romney, who labeled her claims as "treasonous lies" and alleged Russian propaganda.

• Declassification of Information: In June 2026, Gabbard declassified information confirming that the U. S. indeed supported numerous bio-labs, some of which conducted research involving dangerous pathogens and gain-of-function techniques. This disclosure indicated that Ukraine was home to several of these labs.

• Research and Risks: The released documents indicated that the labs in Ukraine were working with highly dangerous pathogens, including those that cause anthrax, tuberculosis, SARS, and Ebola. Concerns were raised that if Russia gained control of these facilities, the pathogens could be misused as biological weapons.

• Reactions to the Revelation: Gabbard's announcement received praise from various quarters, including some Republican lawmakers and figures in medical science, who viewed it as a validation of previously dismissed claims regarding biological research activities in Ukraine.

• Media Coverage: The legacy media, including The New York Times, previously downplayed concerns about bio-labs, suggesting they were based on misinformation. Reports from March 2022 asserted that the U. S. was not funding biological weapons labs, contradicting Gabbard's assertions. Despite that, Gabbard's declassification lent credibility to her claims, reversing the narrative that had painted her as spreading conspiracy theories.

• Censorship and Misinformation: The article references a trend of censorship that labeled legitimate concerns as misinformation. Instances were noted where the media ridiculed allegations of biological labs being funded by the U. S., contrary to the reality now revealed by Gabbard's documents.

Tulsi Gabbard's revelation about U. S. funding of bio-labs marks a turning point in the discussion about foreign biological research and its associated risks. Her actions challenge previous narratives and highlight the tensions between government claims and the concerns raised by skeptics. This situation underscores the importance of transparency and rigorous debate on national security issues, especially those concerning public health and safety in volatile regions. 

https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/satanother-conspiracy-theory-confirmed-us-funded-biolabs-other

Indigenous Nonsense

The article "Indigenous Nonsense," authored by Spyridon Andrews, discusses the complex nature of colonialism and indigenous culture through a journey in Mexico. It reflects on the historical significance of the Aztec Empire and the discussions surrounding colonialism and governance. The piece emphasizes that discussions about who arrived first on a piece of land oversimplify the multifaceted nature of human history.

Colonialism and Indigenous Culture

• The author travels through Mexico with a self-taught scholar referred to as "The Professor," who shares insights on Aztec culture.

• The Professor claims that many negative narratives about the Aztecs are false, which the author challenges by acknowledging the reality of Aztec human sacrifices and military conquests.

• There is a tendency among some to romanticize indigenous cultures and blame colonialism without analyzing the complexities involved.

Historical Context of Conflict

• Human history is characterized by migration, conquest, and cultural exchanges, complicating claims of ownership based solely on who was there first.

• The article stresses that this question of being "first" does not hold up when scrutinized, as most modern nations would be deemed illegitimate if judged on ancestral claims.

• Religious claims to land are criticized as unrealistic, pointing out that many conflicts stem from these theological justifications.

Governance and Political Legitimacy

• The legitimacy of governance should be determined by the ability to create conditions that enable human flourishing.

• Historical examples show that colonial regimes were not all purely exploitative; some laid foundations for future prosperity (e.g., British colonial influence in India and Singapore).

• Conversely, indigenous governance has sometimes led to economic failures and political repression.

Cultural Outcomes

• The article highlights that not all cultures lead to equal outcomes; varied approaches to governance result in different societal conditions.

• Certain cultures encourage innovation and civil liberties, while others may perpetuate oppression and economic stagnation.

• Historical repercussions of governance—good or bad—are essential in assessing the merit of both colonial and indigenous leadership.

Historical Judgments

• The author reiterates that the evaluation of civilizations should focus on their achievements rather than on genealogical claims of superiority or entitlement.

• Notable empires, including Rome and Britain, are remembered not for who was there first but for what they constructed and contributed to society.

• Ultimately, legitimacy is earned through competence, justice, and governance rather than through inheritance or historical claims.

In conclusion, the article argues that the discourse surrounding colonialism and indigenous rights should shift focus from simplistic notions of historical priority to the efficacy of governance. The essence of a society’s value lies not in ancestry but in its outcomes and ability to foster liberty, opportunity, and justice for its people. The vital question that remains is not who arrived first but who governs well and enriches human life. 

https://amgreatness.com/2026/06/13/indigenous-nonsense/

Leftism in Action: UK Gave Billions to Jihad Terrorist Groups

Recent reports highlight serious issues in Britain concerning justice and the handling of taxpayer money. Critics argue that Muslim migrants receive better treatment than native Britons, while the government is accused of ignoring serious crimes and funding hostile entities.

• Britain is noted for a two-tier justice system where Muslim migrants are favored over locals, leading to protests and legal action against dissenters.

• A leaked dossier claims that over £28 billion in taxpayer funds has been given to adversaries, including terrorist groups like ISIS, foreign nations like Russia, and criminal gangs.

• The British welfare system has been described as an “ATM for terrorists,” funding activities that threaten national security.

• Reports indicate that funds also supported companies linked to the Chinese military, highlighting economic vulnerability.

• Critics argue that the influx of migrants is based on false assumptions of safety and integration, leading to negative impacts on society.

• Experts stress a clear link between fraud and terrorist financing, suggesting that Britain is facing significant economic warfare.

• Current political leaders are blamed for the crisis, perceived as prioritizing short-term gains over national security and integrity.

The situation in Britain reflects a troubling combination of ineffective governance, misplaced priorities, and potential national peril, marking a significant shift from its historical strength. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/leftism-in-action-uk-gave-billions-to-jihad-terrorist-groups/

The SpaceX IPO Is a Bet on Human Ingenuity

SpaceX's recent IPO has made it one of the most valuable public companies globally, raising nearly $75 billion and achieving a valuation of $1.77 trillion. This event is viewed as a significant step in harnessing human innovation and opening new industries.

• Valuation and Expectations: Despite a net loss of $5 billion in 2025, SpaceX is valued at approximately 94 times its revenue, reflecting investor confidence in its future potential rather than current earnings.

• Innovative Ventures: SpaceX's merger with xAI has positioned it at the forefront of several potential industries, including affordable access to space, global satellite internet, and space-based manufacturing and computing.

• Future Possibilities: Investors see the IPO as a gateway to new commercial opportunities in low-Earth orbit, such as data centers powered by solar energy and industrial processes benefiting from microgravity.

• Impact on Entrepreneurship: The IPO is expected to create wealth for many SpaceX employees and investors, possibly leading to a surge in new space startups—similar to the innovation boom in Silicon Valley. Entrepreneurial activity in the space sector could see significant growth as resources become available.

• Cautious Optimism: While there is excitement surrounding the potential of SpaceX, there are also risks that some projects may take longer or require more resources than anticipated.

The SpaceX IPO symbolizes a commitment to exploring new frontiers in technology and industry. Investor support reflects a belief in continued human ingenuity and innovation, suggesting a hopeful future for the commercialization of space and the development of new industries.

https://www.city-journal.org/article/spacex-ipo-valuation-stock 

Plankton Production Same As 20 Years Before–Climate Scientists Panic!

Recent research conducted by scientists at Plymouth Marine Laboratory (PML) has shown a concerning decline in ocean productivity in the north-east Atlantic, specifically focusing on phytoplankton, which form the basis of the marine food web. The study, using over 20 years of satellite data, analyzes changes in net primary production (NPP) from 1997 to 2018.

1. Study Findings:

• The research indicates an initial increase in NPP from 1998 to 2003, followed by a significant decline from 2003 to 2018.

• The decline was particularly noted in areas like the north-west European coastal waters, Irish Sea, North Sea, and parts of the Norwegian Sea.

• Changes in sea surface temperature and mixed layer depth were identified as primary factors affecting phytoplankton productivity.

2. Significance of Phytoplankton:

• Phytoplankton are essential to the marine ecosystem as they convert sunlight and carbon dioxide into organic matter.

• The decline in their productivity raises alarms about the future of marine food webs, fisheries, and the ocean's capacity to sequester carbon dioxide.

3. Thermal Stratification:

• As ocean temperatures rise, stronger thermal stratification occurs, affecting the mixing of water layers.

• This reduced mixing limits the transport of nutrients to the surface that phytoplankton need to thrive.

4. Critical Analysis of the Study:

• Some experts criticize the study for relying on a short 21-year time period, which may not reflect long-term trends.

• Historical patterns in ocean temperatures and currents in the North Atlantic suggest that fluctuations may be natural and not necessarily indicative of a long-term decline.

5. Data Issues:

• The study's authors acknowledged significant error margins in the satellite data, which could affect the conclusions drawn regarding NPP changes.

• There is skepticism about the short data period's validity and whether it accurately represents longstanding trends.

6. Community Reactions:

• Various commenters have expressed doubts regarding the methodology and conclusions of the study, emphasizing the complexity of oceanographic data and trends.

• Some argue that perceived declines in productivity might be a result of short-term fluctuations rather than a consistent downward trend.

The research indicating a decline in ocean productivity in the north-east Atlantic raises important questions about marine ecosystems’ health. While the findings highlight critical environmental shifts affecting phytoplankton and, subsequently, the food web, skepticism remains regarding the significance of the data period used and the implications of the study. Further long-term studies may be necessary to understand better the natural variability in ocean productivity before drawing definitive conclusions about trends. 

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2026/06/12/plankton-production-same-as-20-years-before-climate-scientists-panic/

Piketty’s Eco-Marxist Utopia: Why Degrowth and Global Redistribution Will Trap the Poor in Poverty

At the World Inequality Conference in Paris, economist Thomas Piketty and his team announced the Global Justice Report, which outlines a radical plan for global equality while addressing climate change. They argue that with heavy taxation on billionaires and the creation of a Global Justice Fund, nearly 90% of the world's population could double their incomes by 2100 while working significantly fewer hours.

1. Proposed Vision:

• The report envisions all countries reaching a monthly income of €5,000 per person by 2100.

• It projects a decrease in annual working hours from 2,100 to 1,000.

• A global shift to renewable energy is expected to be completed during this period.

2. Critique of Current Inequalities:

• Piketty states that the existing global order favors the wealthy and needs to be replaced by a more democratic system.

• He claims the share of global wealth held by billionaires should drop drastically from 6% to 0.05%.

3. Economic Feasibility:

• The Global Justice Fund is set to spend over 10% of world GDP annually from 2030 to 2060, a proposal critics deem unrealistic without unprecedented global governance or coercion.

• There's skepticism regarding Piketty's reliance on contested data and his long-term projections on income inequality.

4. Underlying Assumptions:

• Piketty connects wealth inequality to climate change, suggesting that the wealthy should pay reparations for historical emissions linked to capitalism.

• Critics argue that the report simplifies complex issues by blaming wealth accumulation solely on environmental degradation and ignores the positive effects of market economies.

5. Work Reduction Claims:

• The recommendation to halve working hours is positioned as necessary for achieving climate goals.

• This notion is viewed as impractical by critics who emphasize that productivity does not naturally lead to reduced working hours but to increased living standards.

6. Political Naivety:

• Piketty assumes that a coalition of countries could effectively impose these policies globally, even without participation from major economies like the U. S. or China.

• Such proposals risk economic sanctions that would not realistically resonate with nations' interests and capabilities.

7. Implications for Developing Nations:

• While the report suggests significant income increases for poorer nations, it simultaneously imposes restrictions on wealth growth for wealthier countries.

• Critics highlight that development should be driven by market access and reliable energy rather than global taxation and redistributive policies.

8. Rejection of Practical Development Models:

• The report is criticized for disregarding successful growth models used by countries like South Korea and China, which prioritized industrialization through affordable energy rather than wealth redistribution.

9. Overall Perspective:

• The Global Justice Report is described as a politically motivated document that rests on shaky empirical foundations.

• Advocates for a more practical approach stress that the focus should be on empowering the poor through market mechanisms, rather than proposing a technocratic utopia directed by global elites.

The Global Justice Report proposes ambitious plans for creating global equality and tackling climate change through heavy taxation on the wealthy and radical changes to the international order. However, it faces significant criticism regarding the feasibility of its proposals, the assumptions underlying its economic models, and its implications for both developed and developing countries. Critics argue that meaningful progress for the world's poor is best achieved through open markets, access to energy, and self-determined growth rather than top-down global redistribution efforts. 

https://www.realclearenergy.org/articles/2026/06/11/pikettys_eco-marxist_utopia_why_degrowth_and_global_redistribution_will_trap_the_poor_in_poverty_1187897.html

Everyone Wants Affordable Energy. Nobody Wants to Cut the Ribbon.

This provides a summary of recent discussions and articles regarding climate change impacts, energy policies, and the Constitution Pipeline project aimed at addressing energy costs in the northeastern United States.

Climate Change Impacts

1. Wildfires and Water Levels: Climate change is leading to increased wildfires in the U. S. and lower water levels in the Great Lakes.

2. Coral Reefs: The impact of climate change is causing significant coral reef die-offs.

3. Extreme Weather Events: Climate change is associated with more severe weather events such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, and droughts.

4. Global Temperature Rise: 2023 was reported as the hottest year in 125,000 years, and temperatures are rising dramatically across the U. S., indicating a climate emergency.

The Constitution Pipeline Project

1. Project Overview: The Constitution Pipeline is a proposed 125-mile pipeline intended to transport natural gas from Pennsylvania to New York and New England. It aims to alleviate energy shortages and raise affordability.

2. Regulatory Challenges: After initial approvals, the project stalled due to regulatory hurdles, particularly a water-quality permit denial in New York.

3. Current Status: Williams Companies has resubmitted applications, with hopes to begin service by early 2028, arguing that this pipeline could save New England consumers billions in energy costs.

4. Economic Impact: The pipeline is projected to create jobs and provide substantial economic benefits due to its capacity to deliver natural gas to millions of homes.

Energy Affordability Concerns

1. Northeast Energy Costs: The northeastern states are facing rising energy costs, which is prompting some state leaders to reconsider stringent emissions policies.

2. Natural Gas Demand: There is increasing demand for natural gas in the New England area, which has faced supply disruptions leading to reliance on costly imported gas.

The discussions surrounding climate change highlight the urgent need for effective energy policies. The Constitution Pipeline represents both the challenges of energy project development and the potential economic benefits of addressing natural gas supply limitations in the northeastern U. S. Balancing climate concerns with energy affordability continues to be a critical issue as states evaluate their energy strategies amidst rising costs. 

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2026/06/12/everyone-wants-affordable-energy-nobody-wants-to-cut-the-ribbon/