US PRESS CORPS ONLINE

It's becoming increasingly difficult to discern fact from fiction, and unfortunately the media has a strong bias. They spin stories to make conservatives look bad and will go to great lengths to avoid reporting on the good that comes from conservative policies. There are a few shining lights in the media landscape-brave conservative outlets that report the truth and offer a different perspective. We must support conservative outlets like this one and ensure that our voices are heard.

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

U.S.-Iran Still Talking, California’s Vote Joke, ICE Gets Paid . . . And More

Iran War: Trump Still Sparring With Iran As Talks Go On

US Hitting Iran (Again) With ‘Self-Defense Strikes’ — RedState

Putting Iranian assets to good use — Las Vegas Review-Journal, via MSN

Trump Says US in ‘Final Throes’ of Iran Deal, Strait of Hormuz Could Reopen Within Days — The Epoch times

Trump says peace deal with Iran could come in ‘two or three days’ — Politico

City of Angels

Sofia Karstens discusses the mismanagement and corruption surrounding California's infrastructure, particularly in light of the 2024 fires and the handling of the Santa Ynez Reservoir. The article raises serious concerns about the priorities of governmental agencies and the implications for public safety and disaster preparedness.

1. Recent California Fires and Infrastructure Problems

• California faced significant fires resulting from neglect of infrastructure, such as the empty Santa Ynez Reservoir, which was drained for repair but left unattended for over 11 months before the crucial fire season.

• Despite the known risks associated with California's climate and fire history, government agencies like the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) prioritized unrelated initiatives over public safety.

2. Misallocation of Resources

• The LADWP's focus was on costly projects, including a $750 million recycling sewer water plant and alternative energy research, while ignoring deteriorating infrastructure needed for firefighting.

• Spending on initiatives like Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is criticized, suggesting that public safety should take precedence over these priorities.

3. Budget Cuts and Public Safety

• Significant budget cuts, including $17 million to the fire department, have been made while over $1 billion was spent on ineffective homelessness programs.

• These cuts threaten the readiness and effectiveness of fire response, raising fears about the city's preparedness for disasters.

4. Fraud and Corruption

• California has seen billions lost to fraud within government programs and unemployment benefits, suggesting systemic issues that contributors have failed to address adequately.

• Laws aimed at preventing reporting on corruption are enacted, making it difficult for media to cover these topics openly.

5. Elections and Voting Integrity

• The piece discusses the role of problematic voting systems in California, particularly with the use of Smartmatic, a company tied to foreign interests and election interference.

• Concerns are raised about fraudulent voter registrations and the implication for democratic elections.

6. Call to Action

• Karstens emphasizes the importance of voter participation, particularly in Los Angeles County, as a means to reclaim democratic processes.

• She urges citizens to demand changes in leadership and address inefficiencies and corruption.

Sofia Karstens' article details alarming trends in California regarding infrastructure management, budget priorities, and electoral integrity. She stresses that current leaders' decisions prioritize ideology over effective governance and calls for civic action to counter these issues. The piece concludes with a strong message that voter engagement in the upcoming elections could influence the broader political landscape beyond California.

https://brownstone.org/articles/city-of-angels/

China Unveils Nuclear-Powered Floating Hub For Green Shipping

China has introduced an innovative offshore logistics platform powered by nuclear energy, aimed at transforming maritime transport. This proposal was presented by Jiangnan Shipyard at the Posidonia International Shipping Exhibition in Greece.

• The floating hub will serve as a cargo transfer station and a refueling/charging center for ships.

• It combines port infrastructure, energy generation, and cargo handling to lower emissions in shipping.

• The primary energy source will be a molten salt reactor, enhanced by renewable energy sources like solar and wind power.

• It will also produce hydrogen, synthetic green fuels, and distribute electricity.

• Advantages of the molten salt reactor include improved safety and quick solidification in case of coolant release.

• Designed for international shipping, this modular platform can be duplicated at various strategic ports.

• Jiangnan Shipyard is also developing a large container vessel powered by a thorium-based molten salt reactor, with recent advancements in thorium fuel conversion by Chinese scientists.

This project represents a significant step towards sustainable maritime transport, showcasing China's commitment to integrating advanced energy technologies in shipping logistics. The innovative design and dual function of the platform could greatly impact the future of the shipping industry.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/china-unveils-nuclear-powered-floating-hub-green-shipping

The Sacrifice Of Innocents

Henry Nowak, an 18-year-old university student, was murdered in Southampton on December 3, 2025, by Vickrum Digwa using a religiously exempted knife. This incident has sparked a critical discourse on Britain's state of multiculturalism, raising questions about legal exemptions and the implications of societal tolerance towards different cultures.

• Incident Overview: Nowak was killed in a stabbing incident attributed to cultural polarization. His assailant used a blade protected by religious exemptions, leading to debates about safety against cultural practices.

• Response from Authorities: Upon arrival, police allegedly prioritized Digwa's false claims of racism over assisting Nowak, illustrating perceived institutional biases in handling such cases. Officers reportedly arrested the victim even as he struggled for breath.

• Family Grief: The emotional toll on Nowak's family has been profound, with his mother and sister expressing an unfillable loss and reflecting on the personal devastation caused by his murder.

• Multicultural Critique: The case has been cited as emblematic of Britain’s challenges with state-sponsored multiculturalism. Critics argue that certain cultural practices have been allowed to override public safety and the well-being of native citizens.

• Statistical Context: Knife crime remains a significant issue in Britain, with over 50,000 reported offenses involving knives in a recent year, indicating a broader societal problem beyond this individual tragedy.

• Calls for Change: Figures like Hampshire Police and Crime Commissioner Donna Jones have called for reviewing laws on religiously permissible blades. Reform UK is pushing to ban ceremonial knives in public, reflecting a demand for more equitable law enforcement.

• Reflection on Society: The writer suggests that multiculturalism has led to legal and moral inconsistencies, benefitting certain communities while endangering others. This imbalance fosters a climate where cultural relativism can thwart justice.

Henry Nowak's death, along with the police's handling of the incident, highlights deep-rooted issues in Britain's approach to multiculturalism and public safety. Advocates argue for a restoration of cultural confidence and equal application of justice to prevent future tragedies. The call is clear: Britain must reassess its cultural policies to protect all citizens and preserve its societal integrity.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/06/the_sacrifice_of_innocents.html

Even ‘Trust the Election’ Pundits Are Suspicious

J. B. Shurk discusses allegations of election fraud in California, specifically in the context of the recent mayoral race in Los Angeles. It highlights growing skepticism about the integrity of elections in the state and nationwide.

1. Allegations of Rigging: The piece claims that California Democrats have manipulated election results, notably in the Los Angeles mayoral race where candidate Spencer Pratt was unexpectedly removed from the ballot despite leading initially. Nithya Raman's late surge to secure a spot in the election is presented as statistically improbable.

2. Punditship and Skepticism: Acknowledgment by some political commentators, like Dan McLaughlin, of suspicions regarding the Los Angeles voting raises concerns about widespread electoral integrity. The article critiques the reluctance of pundits to outright declare issues without hard evidence, likening it to dismissing a burglary without assessing clear signs of wrongdoing.

3. Past Election Concerns: The author references historical allegations of fraud and misconduct in U. S. elections, including voter intimidation and irregularities during the past several presidential elections. Notable events include accusations surrounding the 2000 election, as well as claims about illegal voting and ballot handling.

4. Voting Process Critique: The article discusses issues such as inconsistent requirements for voter identification and the prevalence of mail-in voting, which some suggest complicates the trustworthiness of votes. It notes that "ballot harvesting," where ballots are collected by campaign workers, undermines the direct control of voters over their choices.

5. Widespread Distrust: There is a strong sentiment expressed that Americans of all political backgrounds do not trust the electoral process. The article argues that both parties have reasons to question election outcomes, pointing out that political authority figures often promote mistrust rather than transparency.

6. Call for Accountability: The author advocates for a reassessment of established narratives about election integrity. There’s a suggestion that the public should demand verification and transparency in election processes instead of relying on reassurances from political figures and media.

The article highlights an increasing awareness and distrust among Americans regarding the electoral process, especially in California. It urges readers to critically evaluate the legitimacy of elections and encourages questioning of established political narratives surrounding electoral integrity. The overarching message is a call for more accountability and transparency in the voting system to restore trust in democratic processes.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/06/even_trust_the_election_pundits_are_suspicious.html

SCOTUS Has The Chance To Deliver Decisive Blow To The EPA’s Unconstitutional Overreach

A new legal case involving the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and a small business, Choice Refrigerants, addresses significant issues regarding the separation of powers in the U. S. government. The case could change how federal agencies exercise authority and decide which companies can participate in certain industries.

1. Background of the Case:

• Choice Refrigerants, a small Georgia-based company, has challenged the EPA's allocation of market shares in the hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) industry.

• The EPA's rules have reportedly prioritized "new market entrants" based on "equity" considerations, marginalizing existing businesses like Choice Refrigerants.

2. AIM Act Overview:

• The American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020 (AIM Act) mandated a significant reduction (85%) in HFCs in the U. S. using a cap-and-trade system.

• While the AIM Act specified reduction goals, it did not provide clear guidance on how the EPA should allocate allowances for HFC production or importation.

3. EPA’s Allocation Method:

• The EPA created its standards for distributing allowances without input from Congress.

• They set aside millions of allowances for "new entrants," which includes businesses deemed "worthy" based on social equity considerations.

4. Legal Challenges:

• Choice Refrigerants argues that the EPA's methods violate the nondelegation doctrine, which states that Congress cannot delegate its legislative powers to federal agencies.

• The lower courts upheld the EPA's actions, allowing it to dictate which businesses participate in a lucrative industry based on arbitrary policies.

5. Supreme Court Consideration:

• The Supreme Court will consider this case, and its decision could either support or challenge the current delegation of powers to federal agencies.

• Previous justices have expressed concern about the overreach of federal agencies, indicating a growing sentiment for clearer lines regarding their powers.

6. Concerns About Agency Power:

• Critics argue that the EPA's current practices undermine the free market and allow for bias in favor of certain businesses based on race or gender.

• If the Supreme Court rules in favor of Choice Refrigerants, it may limit the EPA's ability to make regulatory decisions that favor specific groups over others.

The Supreme Court's upcoming review of the case between Choice Refrigerants and the EPA represents a critical moment for regulatory authority in the U. S. This case brings attention to fundamental constitutional principles about the separation of powers and could reshape the landscape for how federal laws are enforced and interpreted in relation to businesses. The outcome may significantly affect both the administrative state and the ongoing discussions about social equity in regulatory frameworks.

https://thefederalist.com/2026/06/09/scotus-has-the-chance-to-deliver-decisive-blow-to-the-epas-unconstitutional-overreach/

SC GOP backs Trump-favored lawmakers, Maine Dems rally behind progressive

The recent primary contests in South Carolina and Maine showcased Trump-aligned candidates performing well in South Carolina while Democrats favored a progressive candidate in Maine. Results mostly aligned with pre-election polling, and there were no significant upsets.

• South Carolina Republican Primaries:

• Pamela Evette, endorsed by Trump, led the gubernatorial primary with 29.3%, followed closely by Attorney General Alan Wilson with 25.9%.

• Other candidates included Ralph Norman (16.8%), Rom Reddy (14.6%), and Nancy Mace (11.8%), with Mace's fifth-place finish being unexpected given her Trump-aligned stance.

• The gubernatorial race will head to a runoff as no candidate achieved the required majority vote.

• In the Senate race, Lindsey Graham easily defeated challenger Mark Lynch, who criticized Graham's foreign policy.

• Maine Democratic Primaries:

• Susan Collins was unopposed for the Republican nomination.

• Graham Platner won the Democratic nomination, defeating incumbent Governor Janet Mills. The Senate Leadership Fund cautioned that Platner could be a “dangerous deviant. ”

• Governor's Race in Maine:

• Robert Charles is projected to face the Democratic candidate in the gubernatorial race, leading by 20 points in his primary. The Democratic primary remains close, with Troy Dale Jackson at 25.8% leading Nirav Shah (23.0%).

Overall, Trump's favored candidates succeeded in South Carolina, while Maine's primaries indicated a shift towards progressive leadership. The outcomes emphasize the continuing influence of Trump within the Republican Party in South Carolina and the emergence of unconventional candidates in Maine.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/wedsc-gop-backs-trump-favored-lawmakers-maine-dems-rally-behind-progressive

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

Iran War: Trump Still Sparring With Iran As Talks Go On

California’s Wild And Woolly Election: Is It All A Fraud?

U.S. Immigration: Still Broke, But Getting Better

Britain Remains Afire As Rage Over Migrant Violence Grows

Are States And Feds Committing Mass Fraud With Tax Dollars?

Some Headlines We didn’t Expect . . .