US PRESS CORPS ONLINE

It's becoming increasingly difficult to discern fact from fiction, and unfortunately the media has a strong bias. They spin stories to make conservatives look bad and will go to great lengths to avoid reporting on the good that comes from conservative policies. There are a few shining lights in the media landscape-brave conservative outlets that report the truth and offer a different perspective. We must support conservative outlets like this one and ensure that our voices are heard.

Thursday, May 28, 2026

South Carolina’s Attorney General Alan Wilson and the Lawyer Legislator Syndicate

By Staff Writer

South Carolina Bulletin

The integrity of the South Carolina political system is being systematically dismantled by a web of financial entanglements between the Office of the Attorney General (SCAG) and the very legislators tasked with overseeing its budget. Recent investigations by the Palmetto State Watch Foundation have exposed a systemic pay to play culture where Litigation Retention Agreements (LRAs) serve as a conduit for moving massive public settlement funds into the private law firms of powerful House and Senate leaders.

When the Attorney General decides to outsource legal work to private firms rather than using in house counsel, he utilizes Litigation Retention Agreements. These agreements often involve lucrative contingency fees from massive class action lawsuits, such as the opioid settlements and the Centene healthcare settlement.

The inherent conflict is structural:

The Legislator Lawyer: Sits in the State House, crafting laws and determining the budget for executive agencies.

The Beneficiary: Their private law firm signs an LRA with the Attorney General.   https://samueleburns.substack.com/p/south-carolinas-attorney-general

Inside the FDA’s ‘Cover-Up’ of Child Deaths Linked to Covid Vaccines

In 2025, the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) examined reports of child deaths associated with Covid-19 vaccinations. The investigation led to significant internal conflict regarding transparency and the implications of the findings.

1. Acknowledgment of Deaths: In September 2025, then-FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary confirmed that the FDA was investigating reports of children dying from Covid vaccines. He stated that they were aware of such fatalities.

2. Internal Disputes: The investigation revealed a deep internal dispute within the FDA. Some officials believed that the public should know the complete findings, while others aimed to suppress this information due to fears of damaging public confidence in the vaccines.

3. Review Findings: Dr. Tracy Beth Høeg, a senior scientist at the FDA, led the review of 96 child death reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). After thorough examination, about 25 deaths were considered serious enough for internal discussion.

4. Media Leaks and Backlash: Details of Høeg's review leaked to major media outlets, resulting in her facing scrutiny and criticism. Some FDA officials accused her of overstating preliminary findings, leading to further division within the agency.

5. Additional Investigations: Following public complaints and internal pressure, the then-FDA vaccine chief, Dr. Vinay Prasad, mandated further investigations into the deaths, which classified 10 fatalities as directly linked to Covid vaccinations.

6. Diverging Conclusions: Subsequent analyses employed differing criteria for classifying vaccine-related deaths, leading to further concerns over the accuracy and transparency of the data.

7. Congressional Scrutiny: The ongoing controversy attracted the attention of Congress. Senator Ron Johnson expressed concerns about a possible cover-up regarding vaccine safety risks, noting the classification of several deaths as possibly related to vaccinations.

8. Proposed Warnings: Høeg argued for a black box warning—a serious alert regarding potential risks—specifically about the possibility of child deaths from the Covid mRNA vaccines. However, this recommendation was ultimately rejected by the FDA.

9. Outcome for Dr. Høeg: Høeg was eventually transferred away from the vaccine division after ongoing tension regarding her findings on vaccine safety. She was later fired after refusing to resign from the FDA.

10. Lack of Public Disclosure: To date, the FDA has not released the comprehensive review of child deaths following Covid vaccinations, raising concerns about accountability and transparency from the agency.

The FDA's investigation into child deaths linked to Covid vaccines sparked intense internal debate over the handling of the findings, transparency, and public communication regarding vaccine safety. The organization continues to be scrutinized for its decisions not to release detailed reviews and handle adverse event reports publicly. The situation remains a pivotal point of contention in the ongoing discussion around vaccine safety and government oversight.

https://brownstone.org/articles/inside-the-fdas-cover-up-of-child-deaths-linked-to-covid-vaccines/

SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler Reveals $200 BILLION in Fraudulent PPP Loans Were Hidden by Biden Admin – “People Are Going to Jail”

During a White House cabinet meeting on May 27, 2026, SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler disclosed significant findings regarding fraudulent Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans. She highlighted that her agency had identified $200 billion in fraudulent loans that were allegedly concealed by the Biden administration. This announcement came amidst a broader discussion about fraud elimination led by Vice President JD Vance.

1. Fraud Discovery: Kelly Loeffler stated that $200 billion in fraudulent PPP loans were uncovered. This amount was claimed to have been hidden or forgiven by the previous administration.

2. Action Taken: Of the fraudulent loans identified, $22 billion has already been returned to the U. S. Treasury for further collection and prosecution efforts. Additionally, at least 140,000 individuals have been barred from obtaining any future SBA loans due to their involvement in stealing approximately $9 billion.

3. Crackdown on Fraud: Loeffler emphasized the commitment to combating fraud within the SBA, under Vice President Vance’s leadership. Arrests have already been made, with some individuals serving jail sentences for their fraudulent activities.

4. Impact on Small Businesses: Loeffler highlighted the adverse effects of such fraud on honest small businesses, which are vital contributors to the economy. She called attention to the hardworking nature of small business owners who face unfair competition from fraudsters.

5. California's Fraud Case: Earlier announcements by Loeffler indicated that 111,620 borrowers in California had been connected to $8.6 billion in suspected pandemic fraud. This was portrayed as a significant effort to hold accountable those exploiting federal programs.

6. Ongoing Investigations: Loeffler mentioned that investigations into fraudulent loans continue; for instance, nearly $400 million in potentially fraudulent loans were discovered in Minnesota, leading to the suspension of 6,900 borrowers in that state.

7. Future Measures: The SBA plans to continue its investigation and prosecution processes, aiming to ensure that responsible financial practices are upheld to protect taxpayer money. Loeffler expressed gratitude for the collaborative efforts with Vice President Vance to expedite these actions.

Kelly Loeffler's revelations concerning the fraudulent PPP loans represent a critical insight into the attempts to clarify and rectify misappropriated funds. With substantial amounts of fraud being identified and action taken against those involved, the SBA is committed to protecting small businesses and taxpayers while promoting accountability. The collaborative leadership under Vice President Vance is seen as essential to enhancing the efficacy of ongoing fraud investigations.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/05/watch-sba-administrator-kelly-loeffler-reveals-200-billion/

Let's Stop Paying to Bankrupt America

The alarming growth of the national debt in the United States, highlighting the disconnect between political rhetoric regarding fiscal responsibility and reality. The author, Jim Cardoza, stresses the long-term consequences of this growing debt on future generations.

1. Deteriorating National Debt: The U. S. national debt has surpassed $35 trillion, a figure that seems abstract to many but has significant implications for future generations, who will be burdened with this debt.

2. Normalization of Debt: Politicians discuss large deficits as if they are commonplace, while ordinary citizens are expected to adhere to strict budgeting in their own finances. This creates an illusion that government can operate free from standard economic rules.

3. Borrowing to Pay Interest: A substantial portion of federal revenue is now going towards interest payments rather than productive investments. This resembles a family using one credit card to pay off another, a situation often described as headed for bankruptcy.

4. Consequences of Debt: The growing national debt hinders economic growth, keeps wages stagnant, and diminishes productivity. It also raises inflation, hurting savers and working Americans as prices rise and incomes do not keep pace.

5. National Security Risks: A heavily indebted nation faces vulnerabilities, as dependence on foreign creditors can limit policy choices and weaken overall national security.

6. Moral and Political Implications: Current spending practices obligate future taxpayers to liabilities without their consent, effectively passing the buck to later generations. This practice is criticized for its lack of accountability.

7. Congressional Accountability Proposal: To address the problem, the author proposes that Congress members should not be paid if they exceed spending beyond the previous year's revenues. This idea aims to change the incentive structure so that lawmakers suffer personal consequences for fiscal irresponsibility.

8. Restoring Fiscal Discipline: The article emphasizes the need to enforce accountability to ensure Congress takes fiscal responsibility seriously, asserting that government must be bound by sound budgeting principles similar to individual families and businesses.

The text concludes with a call to restore fiscal discipline to avoid economic crises caused by unsustainable borrowing and spending practices. Cardoza warns that the U. S. cannot continue to rely on future generations to pay for today's expenses. It is crucial to confront the reality of fiscal responsibility now to prevent severe consequences later.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/05/let_s_stop_paying_to_bankrupt_america.html

Judge Hands Russia Hoaxer Marc Elias Major Loss By Upholding Florida’s New Congressional Map

Recent legal developments have seen a Florida judge reject an attempt by Marc Elias, a controversial lawyer, to block a newly drawn congressional map. This map is expected to favor Republican candidates in the upcoming 2026 midterm elections.

1. Court Decision and Context: Judge Joshua Hawkes denied Elias's request for a preliminary injunction to prevent the new congressional map from taking effect. The new map was signed into law by Governor Ron DeSantis and shifts four U. S. House seats toward Republicans.

2. Legal Arguments: The Elias Law Group argued that the new map should not be enacted due to alleged racial intentions in its design. However, Judge Hawkes determined that the evidence presented was not sufficient to warrant blocking the established map.

3. Judge's Reasoning: Hawkes emphasized that it was presumptive to overturn the new map based on the limited evidence available at this early stage. He stated that any issues with the 2022 map would require a constitutional review and potential re-drawing by the Legislature, rather than a direct court order to revert to the previous map.

4. Implications of the Ruling: The judge cited the need for certainty as elections approach, noting that the primary is only three months away. He stated that public interest weighs against making sudden judicial changes to election maps.

5. Elias's History of Legal Challenges: This ruling adds to a series of legal defeats for Elias, who has previously faced setbacks in various states regarding election laws and redistricting efforts. Despite his long history of legal campaigns, he has struggled to achieve favorable outcomes.

The decision to uphold Florida's new congressional map marks another significant loss for Marc Elias ahead of the 2026 elections. As electoral processes advance, challenges to the integrity and design of electoral maps continue, reflecting ongoing political tensions. Elias and his team plan to appeal the ruling, signaling that this legal battle is not yet over.

https://thefederalist.com/2026/05/27/judge-hands-russia-hoaxer-marc-elias-major-loss-by-upholding-floridas-new-congressional-map/

Judge clears Trump’s voter citizenship checks and mail-in voting crackdown, slapping down Democrats

A federal judge has ruled that President Donald Trump can move forward with an executive order to tighten mail-in voting and conduct citizenship checks on voter rolls, rejecting arguments from Democrats.

• Ruling Details: U. S. District Judge Carl Nichols, appointed by Trump, stated that Democrats lacked the standing to challenge the executive order. They did not prove they suffered any harm necessary for a legal challenge.

• No Immediate Harm: The judge emphasized that since the executive order does not require immediate action and no harm has yet occurred to the plaintiffs, they have no grounds for a preliminary injunction.

• Democratic Arguments Rejected: The court dismissed concerns from Democrats that the order would disenfranchise voters or cause privacy violations. The judge noted the speculation about inaccuracies in state citizenship lists and maintained that sharing voter information among government agencies does not establish sufficient harm to warrant legal standing.

• Executive Order Requirements: While the order includes creating citizenship lists for voter verification, it also contains provisions for correcting any inaccurate information that may arise.

The ruling enables Trump to proceed with measures aimed at enhancing the integrity of mail-in voting, suggesting that the legal challenge from Democrats was insufficient at this time. The focus remains on how these policies will impact voters as procedures are developed further.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/judge-clears-trumps-voter-citizenship-checks-and-mail-voting-crackdown