Modern historians often claim to apply scientific methods in their studies, but Ludwig von Mises, in his work "Theory and History," challenges this notion of “scientism. ” Mises argues that history cannot be fully understood through the methodologies of the natural sciences and highlights the limitations of these approaches in understanding human action and individual experiences.
1. Court Historians and Interpretation:
• Some historians assert they provide the only correct view of history, claiming their interpretations are based solely on primary sources.
• They often overlook the distinction between the facts represented in these sources and their interpretations of their significance.
• This selective emphasis on certain sources reflects personal biases and preferred theories rather than impartial truth.
2. Bias in Historical Understanding:
• Historical figures like John C. Calhoun and Alexander Stephens are labeled “biased,” while figures like Abraham Lincoln are presented as objective.
• The representation of historical events is shaped by the importance assigned to certain narratives while neglecting others.
3. Mises' Critique of Scientism:
• Mises criticizes the approach of historians who use collectivist methods akin to the natural sciences, focusing on groups rather than individuals.
• He explains that this approach detracts from a true understanding of history, as individual actions and motivations are essential to grasping human behavior.
4. Historical Methodology According to Mises:
• Historians should employ two components in their work:
1. Examining primary sources to ascertain factual content.
2. Applying insights from non-historical sciences to contextualize and interpret these facts.
• The first component is reliable and can be objectively checked against the available sources.
5. Disagreement Over Significance, Not Facts:
• Historians may agree on factual evidence but disagree about the implications and importance of those facts.
• Mises argues that the process of understanding history is subjective, influenced by the historian's perspective and personal views.
6. Unique Nature of Historical Understanding:
• Unlike scientific principles that are universally accepted, historical interpretations are not universally valid; they can vary widely among different historians.
• Mises maintains that history is not a deterministic science but a narrative that reflects individual actions and decisions.
7. Critique of Universality in Historical Theories:
• Historians may attempt to derive universal principles from their studies, but these principles often lack substantive proof when compared to established scientific laws.
• Mises asserts that to claim historical statements as scientific merely because they apply across multiple circumstances doesn't yield the same certainty as the laws of physics.
8. Redefining Historical Science:
• Efforts to draw universal statements about human behavior from historical evidence must contend with local contexts that limit their applicability.
• Observing mass phenomena reduces the complexity of human actions and leads to oversimplified conclusions.
9. Case Study of Generalizations:
• The example of apples being universally found across various contexts illustrates the misunderstanding of applying descriptive observations from history to achieving scientific laws.
• Historical narratives should shed light on human nature, but should not be misconstrued as universally true scientific claims.
10. The Nature of Historical Inquiry:
• Clyde Wilson's assertion that history is a vast drama highlights the need for continual learning, challenging the notion that it can be fully understood through scientific methods.
Ludwig von Mises' critiques of modern historiography emphasize the importance of individual action and the subjective nature of historical interpretation. While modern historians attempt to apply scientific methodologies, Mises argues that true historical understanding cannot mirror the certainty of the natural sciences. Historians must acknowledge their biases and the complexity of human behavior, ensuring the discipline recognizes its unique and non-scientific nature.
No comments:
Post a Comment