Today, January 10, 2025, marks what would have been Laken Riley's 23rd birthday. Instead of celebrating her life, her family mourns her tragic death caused by an illegal alien with a criminal record who should not have been on the streets. Recently, in her honor, the House of Representatives passed the Laken Riley Act, a significant step toward fixing flaws in immigration enforcement. This act aims to prevent more families from experiencing the grief that Laken's loved ones now feel.
The Laken Riley Act is essential not only as a policy but also as a moral obligation. It requires Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to detain illegal aliens suspected of theft, addressing a clear need. Despite this, many House Democrats opposed the act. This raises the question: what do the Democrats tell grieving families who hope this law would prevent future tragedies? The legislation is named after Laken, highlighting the importance of protecting the innocent from harm.
The act mandates that ICE detain illegal aliens charged with theft or similar crimes. This change is crucial to stop the current practice of releasing criminal aliens back into the community, where they frequently commit further offenses. Those against the act suggest that their priorities lie more with open-borders activists than with the safety of American citizens. This bill targets those who commit crimes beyond simply being in the country illegally, recognizing that theft has real victims and can lead to further violence.
By opposing this bill, House Democrats are putting people at risk. It is hard to understand why someone who is illegally in the country and commits theft should not be detained. However, some in the Democrat party seem uncomfortable with labeling individuals as "citizens", prioritizing a globalist agenda over the rights of Americans. Their policies appear to emphasize the interests of those ignoring U. S. laws rather than focusing on citizens who follow them.
The opposition to the Laken Riley Act stems from an ideological belief system rather than practical concerns. For many in the Democrat party, the borders and laws of America are more of a hindrance than a necessity. Had the act been in place, Laken might still be alive, as her attacker could have been held accountable. Senators who vote against the act must be prepared to justify their decisions if more tragedies happen.
While most Democrats opposed the bill, a few showed bravery by supporting the legislation. Their actions demonstrate a divide within the party concerning the welfare of American citizens versus adherence to radical ideologies. The Senate now has the opportunity to follow the House's lead. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer's past efforts to block this bill have been unwise. This legislation is crucial and specifically targets criminals.
The stakes are too high for party loyalty. Senators must consider whether they choose to protect law-abiding citizens or shield criminals. This act is not just a political challenge; it tests moral responsibility. A government that does not safeguard its people fails its main duty. If the Senate blocks the act, they prioritize the rights of criminals over American safety. This decision will have serious consequences for American families. The Senate must pass the Laken Riley Act quickly to prevent further tragedies. Laken Riley deserved better, and so do all American citizens.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/01/the_laken_riley_act_must_become_law.html
No comments:
Post a Comment