America is Driven to Act by Guilt to Our Ruination

 The debate surrounding illegal immigration in America, particularly the criticism of generous government support for undocumented immigrants. It contrasts this approach with traditional American values, suggesting that contemporary arguments for supporting illegal immigrants stem from a distortion of American founding principles.

1. Critique of Generosity to Illegal Immigrants:

The author argues that the current Democratic proposals to support illegal immigrants represent a break from the Founding Fathers’ vision, which was to establish a “City on a Hill.” They claim these support programs evoke guilt rather than true generosity, positioning them as part of Marxist ideology rather than American values.

2. Foundational American Ideals:

The notion of America as a “City on a Hill” originates from John Winthrop's sermon in 1630, symbolizing a moral standard for how Americans should behave. Ronald Reagan later echoed this idea, reinforcing it as a core value of American identity.

3. Government Spending on Illegals:

Current proposals could lead to nearly $200 billion spent on healthcare for illegal immigrants, which the author claims violates federal law. This spending is seen as excessive compared to traditional charitable efforts tied to citizenship.

4. Marxism and Political Guilt:

The text posits that Leftist views on immigration are rooted in Marxist socialism, which holds that wealth should be shared globally. This perspective views American prosperity as unearned and creates a moral obligation to assist others based on shared humanity rather than national boundaries.

5. Understanding Guilt in Politics:

There are discussions about “political guilt,” suggesting that societal guilt influences liberal ideologies and calls for equality. This guilt is framed as collective, leading to policies that may not align with sound governance.

6. Progressive Christianity:

Progressive Christians argue for welcoming illegal immigrants based on Biblical teachings that emphasize justice and kindness to the marginalized. They reference scripture calling for the protection of foreigners and view the treatment of immigrants as a reflection of moral duty.

7. Historical Legal Framework:

The Pilgrim Code of 1636 is highlighted as a significant early American legal document emphasizing community consent and rights that inform modern views of governance and law.

8. Cost of Social Programs:

The author critiques the economic implications of social programs, suggesting current spending on welfare is unsustainable, labeling it as “creeping socialism.” Projections for implementing socialist policies are discussed, indicating potential massive deficits and costs per household.

The content argues against the current approach to immigration regulations and welfare in America, asserting that it deviates from historical principles of justice and charity. Instead of promoting egalitarianism, it suggests that contemporary policies driven by guilt may harm both public policy and moral fabric, urging a return to the Founding Fathers' vision of a society governed by personal responsibility, justice, and mercy.

https://canadafreepress.com/article/america-is-driven-to-act-by-guilt-to-our-ruination