Yes, Democratic Socialists Want Soviet-Style Control of Capital

Democratic socialism is gaining traction in the United States, especially within the Democratic Party, as figures like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez advocate for changes that resemble policies in Scandinavian countries. However, this summary discusses the potential consequences of their ambitions, including concerns about the desire for significant control over private capital and property.

1. Rise of Democratic Socialism:

Members identifying as democratic socialists are increasingly prominent in major cities and congressional primaries. They claim to seek a society similar to those in Denmark or Sweden, focusing on welfare policies and social programs.

2. Claims of Benign Intent:

Proponents, like Bhaskar Sunkara from the socialist publication Jacobin, argue that their initiatives aim to make capitalism more humane, addressing inequalities through taxation and regulation rather than outright nationalization.

3. Core Ideals:

Democratic socialists advocate for "decommodification," which means providing essential services like healthcare and education as rights rather than commodities available only to those who can afford them. This involves greater state control of critical economic sectors.

4. Reality Behind Socialism:

The underlying goals of many self-proclaimed democratic socialists extend beyond mere reforms. They often seek to control private property and capital, resembling historical socialist movements rather than the more democratic versions found in modern Nordic countries.

5. Concerns Over 'Social Control':

There are fears that calls for "social control" of capital will lead to nationalization or extensive government oversight of various sectors, mirroring the authority seen in regimes like the Soviet Union rather than free-market practices.

6. Ambitions of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA):

Although the DSA claims to support democratic values, there is an argument that its left-wing factions are increasingly opposed to traditional liberal democracy, aligning instead with authoritarian regimes. Some members are concerned that this shift threatens basic democratic principles.

7. Implications for the Democratic Party:

Prominent Democrats express concern about the DSA's influence, noting that their strategies might lead to higher taxes on wealthy individuals and alterations in property ownership. Democratic campaigns are increasingly focusing on wealth redistribution rather than increasing private capital investment.

8. Economic Consequences:

Moves toward higher minimum wages, socialized housing markets, and increased taxes on the wealthy may not foster economic growth. The article suggests that this collectivist approach, occurring alongside Republican movements that also lean toward collective measures, could lead to challenging economic times ahead.

The rise of democratic socialism within the U. S. is accompanied by significant ideological shifts regarding economic policy and ownership. While supporters claim to seek improvements to capitalism through social programs, critics warn that their ultimate aim may involve seizing control over private capital. This trend could transform the economy and society, raising questions about the long-term implications for democracy and individual freedoms in the United States. 

https://mises.org/mises-wire/yes-democratic-socialists-want-soviet-style-control-capital