Buried Before Ivermectin: Meet Chlorine Dioxide

 The issues surrounding pharmaceutical treatments during the Covid-19 pandemic, specifically focusing on the treatments of hydroxychloroquine and chlorine dioxide. It discusses the perceived corruption within the pharmaceutical industry and how certain effective treatments may have been overlooked or suppressed for financial gain.

1. Corruption in Big Pharma: The author initially viewed corruption within the pharmaceutical industry as minor discrepancies. However, the Covid-19 pandemic led to a belief that effective and inexpensive treatments were overlooked or hidden to maintain profits through vaccines and other treatments.

2. Understanding Covid-19: The article claims that effective treatments for Covid-19 existed from the beginning but were not utilized. It asserts that lockdowns were unnecessary and maintained that many deaths were primarily driven by profit motives rather than public health.

3. Hydroxychloroquine Trials: Hydroxychloroquine became a controversial topic during the pandemic. The author cites cases where the medication was ridiculed and labeled ineffective by major health authorities, despite emerging studies challenging these conclusions. A recent study from the University of Oxford reportedly found hydroxychloroquine effective, which contradicts previous dismissals and frames a grave narrative of the pandemic's management.

4. Questions Surrounding the Oxford Study: The delay in publishing the Oxford study results and its shift in outcome measures raises questions about transparency in medical research and potential motives behind the long wait before results were released.

5. Introduction to Chlorine Dioxide: Chlorine dioxide is presented as a potentially transformative treatment, with claims of efficacy against various diseases, albeit lacking extensive scientific validation at the same level as previous hydroxychloroquine studies. The authors of a book on this subject propose that its widespread use could undermine the pharmaceutical industry's business model.

6. Concerns Over Consequences: The discussion extends to the personal risks faced by proponents of chlorine dioxide, including alleged threats and violence against researchers advocating for its use. The testimonials and anecdotal evidence concerning its effectiveness against severe medical conditions challenge conventional medical narratives.

7. Skepticism of Medical Research: There is a significant focus on bias and the challenges faced by those proposing alternate treatments, with a challenge to readers to question the reasons behind medical recommendations and public health policies that appear to prioritize economic interests over health.

The article calls into question the motives of the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies during the Covid-19 pandemic. It presents a narrative that promotes skepticism toward established health guidelines while noting the controversial and potentially revolutionary treatment of chlorine dioxide. Readers who are critical of conventional treatment methods are urged to explore this topic further while considering the implications of hidden efficacies in the management of public health.

https://brownstone.org/articles/buried-before-ivermectin-meet-chlorine-dioxide/