Sunday, March 1, 2026

Kamala Harris doesn’t want regime change in Iran: ‘Dangerous and unnecessary’

 On February 27, 2026, President Donald Trump authorized military strikes against Iran, described as Operation Epic Fury, which resulted in the death of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and other high-ranking officials. Former Vice President Kamala Harris publicly opposed this action, arguing against what she termed a “regime-change war” and expressing concern for the safety of American troops.

1. Harris's Opposition to Military Action:

• Kamala Harris criticized Trump for initiating a conflict in Iran, stating that the American public does not support such wars.

• She labeled the operation a dangerous gamble that jeopardizes both American lives and regional stability, emphasizing that it was reckless rather than a show of strength.

2. Concerns over Nuclear Threat:

• While acknowledging the threat posed by Iran’s potential nuclear capabilities, Harris questioned the effectiveness of military strikes as a means of addressing this issue.

• She affirmed that Iran should never have nuclear weapons but reiterated that the current military action is not the solution.

3. Criticism of Trump’s Leadership:

• Harris accused Trump of misrepresenting his intentions regarding military conflicts, claiming he previously stated he would prefer to end wars rather than start them.

• She argued that American troops deserve a leader who is serious and disciplined when making decisions about war.

4. Call for Congressional Approval:

• Harris reminded that under the U. S. Constitution, the President needs Congressional authorization to engage in war, urging Congress to use its power to prevent further military commitments by Trump.

5. Response and Backlash:

• Harris faced significant backlash on social media for her comments, with critics questioning her ability to lead and highlighting perceived inconsistencies in her stance.

• Other political figures, including California Governor Gavin Newsom, expressed concerns over Trump's actions, labeling them illegal while simultaneously condemning the Iranian regime, leading to further public criticism of their mixed messages.

Kamala Harris's statements reflect a strong opposition to Trump's military actions in Iran, framed as unnecessary and dangerous by her. She calls for a careful, law-abiding approach to foreign policy while emphasizing the need for congressional oversight. This situation has sparked debates, criticism, and mixed responses from both political allies and opponents, highlighting the complexities of U. S. foreign relations with Iran.

https://nypost.com/2026/02/28/us-news/kamala-harris-rips-trump-over-iran-attack-a-war-american-people-do-not-want/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Paul Harvey: If I Were the Devil

   If I were the devil. If I were the Prince of Darkness, I’d want to engulf the whole world in darkness. And I’d have a third of its real e...