Tuesday, February 3, 2026

U.N. is disseminating ‘consensus’ science. which is not real science

Extreme weather phenomena and critiques the prevailing narratives surrounding climate change. It addresses the validity of global warming claims and the implications of carbon dioxide (CO2) levels on the environment and human health.

1. Extreme Cold Conditions:

• For ten days, vast areas remain covered in thick, resistant ice, with no melting occurring despite sunlight.

• Animals hesitated to traverse this icy landscape, reinforcing the severity of the cold.

2. Skepticism towards Global Warming:

• Global warming advocates, including Al Gore, continue promoting expensive solutions like carbon sequestration despite a lack of warming over the past decade.

• Scientific predictions claiming dire consequences have not materialized, undermining credibility.

3. Scientific Views on CO2:

• Dr. Happer of Princeton argues that current CO2 levels are historically low, suggesting that an increase could benefit agriculture and ecosystems.

• He emphasizes that water vapor and clouds are primarily responsible for greenhouse warming, not CO2.

4. Global Temperature Trends:

• Reports indicate no significant global warming in the last ten years and minor cooling, contradicting IPCC models.

5. Concerns Over CO2 Management:

• The urgency to reduce CO2 appears driven by interests in funding and research rather than genuine environmental concern.

• Examples of hazardous CO2 pipeline incidents raise alarms about safety issues associated with carbon capture projects.

6. Accidents and Health Risks:

• Notable incidents involving CO2, such as a pipeline rupture in Mississippi and the Lake Nyos disaster, highlight potential dangers and health complications from high CO2 exposure.

The discussion questions the motives behind carbon neutrality efforts. It raises doubts about the effectiveness of climate change initiatives that may be more harmful than beneficial. The reliance on consensus-driven science by organizations like the UN also comes into scrutiny, suggesting a disconnect between genuine environmental science and political agendas. 

https://canadafreepress.com/article/icemageddon-and-icecrete

No comments:

Post a Comment

Miracles in the (In)famous Pfizer Trial

Eyal Shahar examines the Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccine trial conducted five years ago, questioning its design and trustworthiness. It discusses ...