The Challenge of Distinguishing History from Fiction

 The blurred lines between historical facts and fictional narratives, particularly in the context of how historical figures like Abraham Lincoln are portrayed in popular culture and literature compared to academic history.

• Historical Fiction vs. Actual History: Writers of historical fiction can create compelling narratives that may not strictly adhere to historical events. They take creative liberties, including inventing characters or altering key facts to enhance storytelling.

• Entertainment and Learning: Although one can learn history through fiction, it is crucial to remember that such narratives are primarily meant for entertainment. Well-crafted stories can teach lessons about history and human nature, but this does not equate to factual accuracy.

• The Dilemma for Historians: Problems arise when historians present fictional accounts as factual history. Tom Woods highlights how Thomas DiLorenzo's "The Real Lincoln" challenges the glorified perceptions of Lincoln, exposing a narrative often suppressed by traditional historical accounts.

• Plausibility in Fiction: Good historical fiction must closely align with what is plausible or relatable to readers. Ludwig von Mises suggests that effective fiction reflects an understanding of human behavior, making it believable even when depicting imaginary events.

• Thymological Experience: Mises defines "thymological experience" as understanding human motivation and behavior, which is crucial for creating believable characters in fiction. If characters act in ways contrary to human nature, the story risks losing its credibility.

• Lincoln's Historical Portrayal: The portrayal of Lincoln as an abolitionist aligns with contemporary moral views but misrepresents historical motivations. Lincolns primary objective in the Civil War was to preserve the Union, not necessarily to abolish slavery.

• Emancipation Proclamation: Lincolns proclamation aimed to free slaves in Confederate states but did not affect slaves in Union-supporting states. This distinction reveals the tension between popular narratives and historical facts surrounding his actions.

• Self-Perception of Americans: The narrative that frames Lincoln as a hero conforms to Americans' self-image as do-gooders, leading to a distorted understanding of history. This delusion can obscure the more complex and often harsh realities of past events.

• Understanding Historical Truth: Mises emphasizes that history should strive for accuracy in representing past events, focusing on factual correspondence rather than appealing narratives that make people feel good about themselves.

The distinction between historical fact and fiction often becomes blurred, particularly when popular narratives do not align with the actual motivations and actions of historical figures. A comprehensive understanding of history requires a commitment to uncovering truth rather than merely constructing appealing stories.

https://mises.org/mises-wire/challenge-distinguishing-history-fiction