Ten years of the same script. Who is paying?

A concerning trend where financial resources seem to promote disorder in major cities. The narrative suggests that chaos is not only tolerated but encouraged, with significant funding backing organized protests and anti-law enforcement sentiments.

1. Funding Patterns:

A clear pattern has emerged since 2016, where financial resources flow into cities experiencing heightened chaos. Cities that showcase disorder attract attention and financial support from organizations and foundations.

2. Organized Protests:

Protests in cities like Minneapolis show signs of organization rather than spontaneity. Participants used advanced tools for coordination and were equipped with professionally produced materials, suggesting a well-funded operation.

3. Examples of Violence:

Incidents in cities such as Los Angeles, where bricks were strategically placed for use against police, exemplify how violence may be orchestrated rather than accidental.

4. Grant-Driven Chaos:

The events surrounding the 2020 Black Lives Matter movement raised questions about the sources of funding that fueled public disorder. Many organizers were alleged to have mismanaged financial support intended for the movement.

5. Political Implications:

Some politicians openly criticize federal law enforcement agencies, aligning themselves with activism that seeks to undermine traditional policing. This undermining of law enforcement is often supported by grant funding that prioritizes political ideology over public safety.

6. Financial Gains for Leaders:

There are growing concerns over how public servants, like certain members of Congress, accumulate wealth while in office. Notable examples include Ilhan Omar and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who face scrutiny regarding their financial activities.

7. Impact on Public Safety:

Policies fueled by financial incentives often disregard public safety, leading to dangerous outcomes as offenders are released with minimal consequences. The expectation to downplay risks has resulted in serious crimes being committed shortly after release.

The interplay between financial resources and social disorder raises critical questions about who benefits from the chaos. The narrative suggests that the funding is not mere coincidence but a structured approach to influence urban environments, putting public safety at risk for financial gain. Understanding the source and motives behind this funding is paramount to addressing the root causes of unrest in these communities. 

https://spectator.org/crime-and-chaos-pays-for-the-people-at-the-top/