Carter Page, a figure involved in the Russiagate investigation, has taken his legal battle to the Supreme Court. He claims that federal officials violated his constitutional rights by obtaining a surveillance warrant with incorrect information.
• Background: Carter Page worked as an adviser for Donald Trump's 2016 campaign and was investigated by the FBI for potential Russian interference.
• Lawsuit: In 2020, Page filed a lawsuit against former FBI officials, claiming they misled the court to obtain a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to surveil him, which he argues damaged his reputation and career.
• Court Decisions: Initially, federal courts dismissed Page's lawsuit, even after the Justice Department acknowledged serious errors in the FISA process regarding Page. The courts ruled that these mistakes did not qualify him for monetary damages.
• Current Status: His case reached the Supreme Court after the U. S. Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal. The Supreme Court is currently deciding whether to hear the case, titled "Carter Page v. James B. Comey," with the government's response delayed until mid-March.
• Legal Arguments: Page’s lawyers emphasize the importance of this case for civil liberties, contending that victims of false FISA warrants should have the ability to sue government officials for redress.
Carter Page's case at the Supreme Court could have significant implications for civil liberties and the accountability of federal surveillance practices. The justices have yet to make a final decision on whether to hear the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment