The debate surrounding the SAVE Act, which requires proof of citizenship for voter registration, has sparked new criticisms, particularly regarding its potential impact on women who have changed their names after marriage. Opponents argue that this requirement could disenfranchise these women, implying they can't manage necessary paperwork.
• The argument that married women cannot obtain documents to prove citizenship is seen as patronizing. Most American women regularly handle name changes for various legal documents, showing their capability in this area.
• Previous debates about voter ID laws for minority voters used similar language, assuming these groups lack the ability to acquire basic identification.
• Critics overlook that many women already possess valid identification such as REAL IDs, which require proof of identity and citizenship. This suggests they can provide documentation for voter registration.
• The SAVE Act focuses solely on voter registration and verifying citizenship, aligning with practices in numerous countries worldwide that require some form of identification to vote.
• The assertion that the Act would disenfranchise women ignores the real issue of ensuring that only citizens are added to federal voter rolls.
The criticism of the SAVE Act hinges on misconceptions of women's capabilities regarding legal documentation. It suggests that women are fully capable citizens, and the true condescension lies in suggesting otherwise. The Act does not disenfranchise women but aims to enforce citizenship verification in the voting process.
https://canadafreepress.com/article/new-democratic-argument-against-save-act-insults-women
No comments:
Post a Comment