Dear ICE Protestors: We Need to Talk

 Jenna McCarthy addresses the actions and motivations of recent protestors against the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency. She explores the implications of a hypothetical scenario in which protestors succeed in abolishing ICE and examines the realities of crime and public safety associated with such actions.

• Protest Actions: McCarthy acknowledges the dedication protestors have shown through rallies, chants, and signs while also noting their more aggressive actions, such as damaging property and assaulting officers.

• Hypothetical Victory: She asks the protestors to imagine winning their fight against ICE, urging them to consider what happens next. If ICE is abolished, McCarthy questions the plan for dealing with dangerous individuals who are in the community but not being deported.

• Public Safety Concerns: McCarthy highlights that many individuals currently targeted by ICE are serious criminals, suggesting that their removal is necessary for community safety. She argues that simply removing ICE does not address the larger issue of violent crime.

• Perspective on Crime: The article notes that while statistics may show illegal immigrants committing fewer crimes, the focus should be on the specific violent offenders who are in the U. S. unlawfully. McCarthy suggests that the presence of these individuals poses a continued threat to public safety.

• Historical Context: McCarthy emphasizes that immigration enforcement has existed under every administration, debunking the notion that it is solely a product of the Trump administration.

• Branding of ICE: She points out the negative perception of the ICE agency, suggesting that its name contributes to public sentiment against it. A more positively framed agency might receive more support despite similar functions.

• Call for Productive Activism: McCarthy encourages protestors to channel their energy into productive changes within the system, such as advocating for better regulations and oversight rather than calling for abolition of the agency.

• Consequences of Abolition: She warns that eliminating ICE could lead to dangerous offenders remaining in neighborhoods, potentially endangering families, and emphasizes the need for a balanced discussion about immigration enforcement.

Jenna McCarthy's article serves as a critical evaluation of the current protests against ICE, urging activists to reconsider their approach and consider public safety in their demands. She challenges them to propose realistic alternatives for dealing with violent offenders instead of merely opposing immigration enforcement as a whole. The piece calls for a more constructive dialogue about the complexities of immigration and law enforcement.

https://jennasside.rocks/p/dear-ice-protestors-we-need-to-talk?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1598754&post_id=186211600&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=r9734&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email