The ongoing struggle for freedom among the Iranian people, arguing that the West must support these efforts rather than remain neutral or pursue appeasement with the Iranian regime. Historical lessons about the futility of appeasement are presented, emphasizing the need for active support of the Iranian people's quest for liberty.
1. Historical Context and Ignored Lessons: The article emphasizes that previous attempts at appeasement towards the Iranian regime have failed. Instead, the author argues that true support for Iranian freedom comes from actively standing with the people against their oppressive government.
2. Criticism of Western Neutrality: The author points out that some voices in the West believe that supporting Iranian democracy demonstrators could harm their cause. The author vehemently disagrees, arguing that ethical responsibility necessitates support for those who aspire to freedom.
3. Past Failures: Historical references are made to the lack of support during the 2009 protests in Iran, which were crushed without any backing from the Obama administration. This failure led to further repression and suffering for the Iranian people.
4. Current Protests: The article highlights ongoing protests and the death toll among protestors, indicating widespread discontent not just about economic issues, but a fundamental desire for freedom. The author criticizes the narratives that downplay these protests as purely economic.
5. Misunderstandings by Global Leaders: Figures like U. N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres are criticized for being "shocked" by the Iranian regime's violence, ignoring its long history of human rights abuses. Quotes from dissidents stress that the treatment of a regime's people reflects its potential behavior towards others.
6. Support from U. S. Leadership: The article acknowledges President Trump’s expression of support for the Iranian people amidst growing repression. Plans are discussed regarding military options and cyber capabilities, highlighting the need for a firm stance against the Iranian regime.
7. Cautions Against Military Involvement: While supportive of the protests, the author warns against too much U. S. military involvement, suggesting that it could worsen the situation by giving the regime an opportunity to portray itself as a victim.
8. The Role of the Iranian People: Emphasis is placed on the idea that the end of the Iranian regime will come from the Iranian people themselves rather than outside forces. The author believes in their capacity to achieve freedom through their own struggles.
9. Call for Moral Action: A moral imperative to act and support Iranian freedom is reiterated, warning against abandoning those fighting for liberty in the name of neutrality.
The struggle for freedom in Iran is characterized as a pivotal moment in history. The author calls for the West, especially the U. S., to recognize and actively support the aspirations of the Iranian people for liberty. The sentiment is that, while caution is advised, the moral obligation to aid those in pursuit of freedom should take precedence. The article closes with a hopeful tone, asserting that despite the difficulties, the Iranian people are determined to achieve their independence.
https://amgreatness.com/2026/01/17/a-human-wave-of-hope-the-iranian-people-demand-freedom/
No comments:
Post a Comment