Tuesday, December 9, 2025

The Ops Against Pete Hegseth Are Designed To Further A Color Revolution

Recent discussions around U. S. military leadership, specifically comments made by Senator Mark Kelly about Pete Hegseth, reveal a growing concern that the left may be facilitating a "color revolution" aimed at undermining the current government. This concept involves the perceived orchestration of events by left-leaning politicians to alter the fundamental principles of the country.

1. Criticism of Military Messaging: Senator Kelly criticized Pete Hegseth for promoting a warrior ethos, arguing that such messaging is not suitable for the Secretary of Defense. Critics suggest that military leaders should focus on non-violent, diplomatic solutions rather than talk about combat.

2. Historical Context of Militaries: The piece argues that the military's primary role has always involved deadly force to protect a nation. The author references historical perspectives to suggest that the purpose of military forces remains unchanged, especially in the face of global threats.

3. Emerging Color Revolution: The article claims that elements of a color revolution are currently manifesting in the U. S. through attempts to discredit leadership, instigate civil disobedience, and delegitimize supporters of the current administration. This includes accusations of fascism against political opponents, signaling unrest against authority figures.

4. Military Allegiance and National Identity: The author emphasizes the importance of a militarily loyal to the U. S. Constitution and its founding principles as a safeguard against revolutionary attempts. There are concerns that attempts to alter the ethos of the military could weaken its effectiveness against challenges to democracy.

5. Cultural Shift Towards 'Wokeness': The left’s promotion of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within the military is cited as a tactic to dilute traditional values associated with the military. The argument suggests that the left wants to create a military that reflects progressive values rather than the warrior mindset that has historically defined it.

6. Warrior Ethos in American History: The article discusses the idea that American identity is linked to a warrior spirit, citing historical figures and events that reflect perseverance against challenges. The author argues that the current political climate aims to diminish this spirit, which they believe is essential for maintaining individual and national strength.

7. Fear of Historical Awareness: Lastly, there is an assertion that the left fears historical narratives that emphasize American independence and conflict. By discouraging a strong warrior ethos and revising historical teachings, the goal appears to be the disempowerment of the nation's character.

The text posits that recent military discussions are indicative of a larger trend where the left is allegedly attempting to weaken core American values through a systematic color revolution. The author warns that this shift could undermine not only military effectiveness but also the nation's overall identity as a resolute and courageous society. 

https://thefederalist.com/2025/12/08/the-ops-against-pete-hegseth-are-designed-to-further-a-color-revolution/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Why Governments Prefer Cigarette Revenue over Safer Alternatives

Roger Bate discusses the economic and regulatory dynamics surrounding tobacco harm reduction in the United States, particularly in light of ...