The Five Big Lies of Vaccinology

The field of vaccinology, specifically surrounding new medical studies and changes in vaccine recommendations. It emphasizes perceived dishonesty in vaccine research and presents five main critiques of current vaccine practices.

1. Recent Events in Vaccinology

• The New England Journal of Medicine published results from Pfizer’s study on a new mRNA-based influenza vaccine, which has faced criticism for its methodology and honesty.

• The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted to modify the recommendation for the Hepatitis B vaccine for newborns, aligning U. S. practices closer to those of other developed nations.

2. Controversy in Vaccine Research

• The Pfizer study has been revealed to include deceptive practices such as the use of non-standard placebos, selective data reporting, and misrepresentation of its findings.

• The response to the ACIP’s recommendation change has been characterized by alarmist reactions, claiming an impending public health crisis, which are deemed unsupported by scientific data.

3. The Underlying Issues

• Following the release of the Pfizer article and the ACIP decision, the integrity of vaccine research and the current pediatric vaccine schedule have come under scrutiny. Baker argues these controversies illustrate a larger issue within the vaccine industry regarding transparency and accountability.

4. The Five Big Lies of Vaccinology

• Big Lie 1: Equating antibody production with true immunity to disease.

• Big Lie 2: Use of fake placebos in studies, which undermines the validity of trial results.

• Big Lie 3: The belief that an individual's immunity is dependent on the vaccination status of others.

• Big Lie 4: Claims that receiving multiple vaccines simultaneously is safe.

• Big Lie 5: The broad assertion that vaccines are fundamentally “safe and effective. ”

5. Honorable Mentions

• Declaring mRNA gene therapies as “vaccines,” which the author believes mischaracterizes their nature.

• Permitting pharmaceutical companies to conduct their own clinical trials, raising questions about objectivity and trustworthiness.

Baker asserts that the current state of vaccinology is marred by significant falsehoods requiring critical examination. He suggests that the controversies surrounding vaccine research and recommendations indicate a fundamental problem that must be addressed in order for the vaccine industry to regain public trust. He hints at further discussions on each of these topics in future essays, calling for a re-evaluation of current beliefs and practices in vaccinology. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-five-big-lies-of-vaccinology/