Thursday, November 20, 2025

Socialism Is a Political Doctrine, Not an Economic One

 Socialism is primarily a political system disguised with economic language. Despite its historical failures, socialism remains appealing as a political ideology today. It highlights the inadequacies of socialist economic systems and critiques the prevailing narrative that blames capitalism for societal issues.

1. Historical Context: Socialism has existed for over 150 years, with notable implementation during the Soviet Union and various revolutions in Asia, Cuba, and Africa. These periods revealed significant economic failures predicted by theorists like Ludwig von Mises.

2. Economic Calculation Problem: Mises argued that socialism was doomed to fail because it lacks a method for proper economic calculation. Despite claims that socialist economies were uplifting people from poverty, evidence shows they were failing.

3. Recognition of Failure: By the late 1980s, even prominent socialists had to acknowledge that socialism had faltered, with only Cuba and North Korea continuing the experiment. Robert Heilbroner, a once-ardent socialist, admitted that capitalism produced better outcomes than socialism.

4. Contemporary Shift in Blame: Modern issues like poverty and inflation are often unfairly attributed to capitalism, despite evidence pointing to government intervention and policies as root causes. Critics of capitalism frequently overlook these complicating factors.

5. Resurgence of Socialism: Publications like Jacobin indicate a renewed focus among socialists on creating confidence in the feasibility of socialist systems. They seek political success rather than actual economic implementation, promising potential solutions without accountability.

6. Political Strategy: Socialists are increasingly focused on gaining relevant positions within existing political structures, particularly the Democratic Party in the U. S. Noteworthy candidates, like Julia Salazar in New York, exemplify this approach by advocating for radical changes while maintaining power through party affiliation.

7. Failure to Deliver: The article states that socialist leaders often fail to meet their promises once in office. Instead of addressing the real economic questions, they reframe failures as successes due to ideological underpinnings.

8. Contextual Redefinition: Socialists might downplay poverty caused by their systems while uplifting it in a different context, symbolizing a disconnect that allows them to maintain a moral high ground.

9. Critique of Academic Views: Many academics and commentators argue against capitalism without engaging in factual economic analysis, perpetuating a narrative that portrays capitalism as a moral failure.

10. Antieconomics: The article describes socialism as focusing on redistributing wealth rather than understanding production principles. Socialists focus more on winning elections than on articulating coherent economic plans.

The article posits that socialism, while politically appealing, ultimately fails as an economic system. Many socialists today are more adept at political maneuvering than at addressing fundamental economic calculations necessary for a thriving society. They promise change but often produce ineffective outcomes, revealing a significant gap between ideology and practical implementation in economic governance. 

https://mises.org/mises-wire/socialism-political-doctrine-not-economic-one

No comments:

Post a Comment

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna EXPOSES Plot To Protect Dem With Epstein Ties | DC Dive

 The main stories reported by The Gateway Pundit, focusing on significant political events and controversies as highlighted in the "DC ...