OpenAI demands 100GW of new energy capacity per year

 OpenAI has made a significant request for the U. S. to generate 100 gigawatts (GW) of new energy capacity annually to support the booming demand from AI data centers. This situation raises important questions about energy priorities between machinery and human needs, as well as geopolitical competition, especially against China.

1. AI's Energy Demand:

• OpenAI emphasizes that electricity is crucial for AI development, referring to it as "the new oil."

• The request for 100 GW of energy equates to the power consumption of approximately 80 million households.

• There is concern over a potential "electron gap" where the U. S. may lag behind China in energy capacity and AI advancements.

2. Comparative Energy Capacity:

• In 2024, China added 429 GW of new energy capacity, nearly nine times that of the U. S., which only added 51 GW.

• OpenAI foresees this energy gap could jeopardize America's position as a leader in AI technology.

3. Nuclear Power Reconsideration:

• Amidst the energy crisis, tech giants, including OpenAI and Google, are turning to nuclear energy. Google is reviving a previously closed nuclear plant, while OpenAI advocates for quickly permitted new reactors.

• Critics are worried about the reliability and costs associated with nuclear power, citing past issues with companies like Westinghouse.

4. Water Scarcity Issues:

• AI data centers consume vast amounts of water for cooling, exacerbating drought conditions in already water-scarce regions.

• OpenAI's strategy to stock critical minerals suggests efforts to control supply chains, but this has led to speculation about deeper globalist agendas concerning resource distribution and population control.

5. Shift from Climate Advocacy:

• Big Tech is shifting its priorities from sustainability to securing cheaper energy sources.

• Meta recently initiated a gas plant project, moving away from earlier environmental commitments in favor of economic incentives.

6. Control Over Resources:

• The competition for energy resources poses a dilemma: prioritizing AI growth could lead to reduced energy availability for humans, which raises ethical concerns about AI's autonomy over energy needs.

• The ongoing challenge remains whether humans or machines will dictate energy consumption in the future.

As the AI industry continues to expand, the immediate demand for energy sets the stage for a crucial battle for control over resources between technology and human needs. The U. S. faces critical decisions regarding energy infrastructure, environmental concerns, and geopolitical competition, particularly in relation to China. The unfolding scenario calls into question the long-term implications of prioritizing AI growth over sustainable human energy consumption. The world watches to see whether control will lie in the hands of people or machines. 

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-11-01-openai-demands-100gw-energy-capacity-per-year.html