An investigation reveals that key officials from Donald Trump’s administration may have unintentionally aided the narrative around the Russian interference claims during his presidency. This summary outlines findings based on declassified documents and interviews, indicating that even Trump’s own appointed officials had roles in concealing evidence that could counter the accusations of Russian collusion.
1. Manufacturing Intel:
• Obama administration officials allegedly created intelligence linking Trump to Russia following his 2016 election win.
• This intelligence formed the basis for the Russiagate narrative, which suggested Trump had colluded with Russia to win.
2. Trump Officials' Involvement:
• Key members of Trump’s administration, including John Bolton and Mike Pompeo, reportedly suppressed evidence doubting the credibility of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) crafted under Obama, which asserted Russian involvement in Trump’s election.
3. Failures to Communicate:
• Fred Fleitz, Bolton's chief of staff, discovered flaws in the ICA but claims Bolton did not pass this information to Trump.
• This lack of communication meant Trump remained unaware of potentially exculpatory evidence that could have cleared him of collusion suspicions.
4. CIA's Role in Obstruction:
• Evidence suggests the CIA, under Pompeo and Haspel, was not only uncooperative with congressional investigations into the ICA but actively obstructed their efforts.
• Investigators faced numerous technical issues and restrictions, which hampered their work in reviewing the ICA.
5. Secrecy and Classification:
• Haspel allegedly kept vital reports classified until after the 2020 election, which may have prevented transparency regarding the accuracy of the ICA and its claims against Trump.
6. Impact of Durham's Investigation:
• John Durham, appointed to investigate the origins of the Russiagate claims, opted not to release information that could have cleared Trump’s name prior to the 2020 election.
• His investigation raised questions but focused less on undermining the established narrative linking Trump to Russia.
7. Current Legal Consequences:
• Declassified documents are now used in ongoing criminal investigations targeting former Obama administration officials, indicating that the narratives surrounding Russiagate may still have repercussions.
8. Criticism of Investigations:
• Many Trump supporters and former officials criticize Durham’s investigation as inadequate, claiming he failed to pursue significant leads that could have exposed misdeeds from the Obama era.
9. Allegations of Intelligence Manipulation:
• Claims have surfaced indicating that the intelligence used to accuse Trump was politicized, shifting focus away from concrete evidence and relying on unverified reports, such as the Steele dossier.
The investigation into the actions of Trump's cabinet and their implications reveals a complex interaction between intelligence, politics, and presidential accountability. While information was suppressed that could have potentially cleared Trump's narrative of collusion with Russia, the controversy surrounding these actions continues to evolve as new details emerge from ongoing investigations. The dynamics of U. S. intelligence and governance during and after the 2016 election remain a contentious issue, reflecting broader political tensions.
No comments:
Post a Comment