How Herbert Hoover Became Known as an Economic Non-Interventionist

 The widely held belief that Herbert Hoover was a staunch advocate of laissez-faire economics who “did nothing” during the Great Depression is challenged in this analysis. This summary seeks to clarify Hoover's actual approach to economic policy and the reasons behind the myths surrounding his presidency.

Hoover’s Actual Interventionism

• Contrary to popular belief, Hoover was not a passive president. He and Franklin D. Roosevelt both pursued heavy government intervention to address the Great Depression.

• Hoover's administration initiated unprecedented governmental interventions in the economy, indicating his belief that immediate action was necessary.

• One of the key myths perpetuated about Hoover is that he failed to respond effectively to the economic crisis, which is historically inaccurate.

The Myth of Inaction

• The characterization of Hoover as ineffective stems from historical misrepresentations and repeated misinformation.

• Hoover actively sought to cushion the economic fallout using government powers, as documented by his own writings and actions.

• The notion that he favored a hands-off approach was perpetuated by various factions who believed he did not go far enough in his interventions.

Origins of the Myth

1. Austerity Myth: Hoover's government was engaged in spending, but this was perceived as austerity when compared to previous spending rates. The narrative claimed he was cutting back when, in reality, he maintained government activities.

2. Democratic Campaign Strategies: The Democratic National Committee under FDR’s leadership used a deliberate campaign to tarnish Hoover’s image, coining phrases like "Hoovervilles" to associate him with the negative aspects of the Depression.

3. Historians’ Tendency: Early historians adopted the Democratic narrative, portraying Hoover as aloof and ineffective. This approach skewed public perception and shaped academic interpretations for decades.

4. Comparison with FDR: Hoover's reluctance to embrace more extreme progressive measures created a contrast with Roosevelt, whose more aggressive policies contributed to the belief that Hoover was non-interventive.

Reassessment of Hoover’s Presidency

• While some historians have acknowledged Hoover’s progressive tendencies and actions, they often do not link his policies and those of FDR to the prolongation of the Depression.

• Hoover's reluctance to adopt extreme measures led to a distortion of his image, portraying him erroneously as a champion of free-market principles.

The belief that Hoover was a non-interventionist president is rooted in misconceptions and has persisted through political campaigns and historical interpretations. Recognizing Hoover's significant, though flawed, interventions provides a more nuanced understanding of his presidency and highlights the ongoing misrepresentation of economic history surrounding the Great Depression. The need to correct these records is essential, as the narratives around Hoover impact modern interpretations of market policies and state intervention. 

https://mises.org/mises-wire/how-herbert-hoover-became-known-economic-non-interventionist