How CDC and FDA Defrauded the American Public about Serious Vaccine Harms

 The revelations by lawyer Aaron Siri in his book, "Vaccines, Amen. The Religion of Vaccines," which claims that the CDC and FDA have misled the American public regarding vaccine safety. It highlights the use of legal challenges to uncover hidden information about vaccine harms, critiques vaccine testing methods, and questions the integrity of institutions involved in vaccine approval.

1. Misleading Information:

• Aaron Siri's book argues that the public has been systematically misled about vaccines through inadequate studies and misrepresentations by the CDC and FDA.

• He emphasizes the need for lawyers to expose truths about healthcare.

2. Flawed Trials and Data:

• Many vaccine studies lack proper placebo controls, which raises serious concerns about the accuracy of conclusions drawn regarding vaccine safety.

• The regulatory environment, especially after the 1986 law granting manufacturers immunity, creates a lack of accountability.

3. Issues with Vaccine Safety Monitoring:

• The Health and Human Services (HHS) was required to report vaccine safety every two years but failed to submit reports for over 30 years.

• Critical data on adverse events and vaccine effectiveness is reportedly suppressed or inadequately reported.

4. Historical Context of Vaccines:

• While some vaccines, such as the smallpox vaccine, have had significant public health impacts, claims about the effectiveness of modern vaccines, particularly in reducing mortality, are challenged by historical mortality decline trends prior to widespread vaccine use.

5. Specific Vaccine Studies:

• Studies on the DTP vaccine, particularly by Peter Aaby, suggest it may increase overall mortality, contradicting claims of its safety.

• WHO's reviews are critiqued for favoring vaccine narratives despite evidence that could suggest otherwise.

6. Manipulation of Data and Findings:

• The narrative around vaccine benefits often disregards data showing harm, with studies suggesting increased risks being labeled as unreliable.

• Regulatory bodies are implicated in manipulating data and not publishing negative findings.

7. Inadequate Reporting Procedures:

• Adverse event reporting systems like VAERS are underreported, leading to a misleading understanding of vaccine safety.

• The CDC is accused of misrepresenting the results of its safety monitoring systems.

8. Comparative Studies:

• A significant study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children from Henry Ford Health found higher rates of chronic diseases in vaccinated children, a finding that was reportedly suppressed.

The text concludes with a call for change, stating that the current system fails to ensure adequate vaccine safety testing. It warns that this negligence could lead to significant public health consequences and advocates for reform, suggesting support for officials who challenge current vaccine policies. The emphasis lies on the necessity of transparency and accountability in vaccine research and public health recommendations.

https://brownstone.org/articles/how-cdc-and-fda-defrauded-the-american-public-about-serious-vaccine-harms/