Democrats Fight For A Fractured America

 This article discusses political discourse in the United States, focusing primarily on the comments made by Marjorie Taylor Greene during an interview about her political behavior and its repercussions. It highlights the perceived tension within the political landscape, particularly how certain individuals are treated based on their criticisms of their own party.

1. Interview with Greene:

• Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican congresswoman, expressed remorse for her involvement in "toxic politics," especially in light of the assassination of Charlie Kirk. She acknowledged the fairness of criticisms directed at her.

2. Left and Right Dynamics:

• The article asserts that Greene's admission is being manipulated by the left to create division within the Republican Party. This tactic is compared to previous actions against other Republican figures who criticized their party, implying a coordinated effort to undermine internal cohesion among Republicans.

3. Media Critique:

• The piece criticizes the media, particularly left-leaning networks, for perpetuating inflammatory rhetoric and for failing to retract false narratives about political opponents. It argues that this media behavior fuels division and political violence.

4. Political Violence Acceptability:

• Polling data is discussed, indicating that a significant portion of Democrats (29%) believe political violence can be justified, as opposed to only 6% of Republicans. This pattern is linked to a larger trend of acceptance of violent rhetoric among certain political groups.

5. Historical Context:

• The Oklahoma City bombing is identified as a pivotal moment when the political narrative started turning potentially violent, with Democrats attempting to blame conservative figures unfairly. Historical examples are cited to illustrate a long-standing trend towards demonizing political opponents, exacerbating divisions.

6. Remark on Political Leadership:

• The article attributes some of the current political climate's violence-promoting behavior to influential Democratic leaders such as Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, who have been accused of inciting animosity toward Republicans in their speeches.

7. Conclusions on Political Rhetoric:

• There's a call to reflect on how political divisions have been escalated, with the author questioning whether part of the political left's leadership and their media counterparts should be labeled as promoting subversive or terrorist tendencies based on their inflammatory statements.

The article presents a critical view of the current political climate, emphasizing the manipulation and divisiveness within political discourse, particularly from the left against the right. It highlights the concerning acceptance of political violence by a notable segment of the Democratic Party and stresses the need for introspection regarding political rhetoric's impact on civil society. The author's opinions reflect an intense scrutiny of media practices and political narratives that contribute to a fractured America.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/11/democrats_fight_for_a_fractured_america.html