Arctic Frost’s Spying on Members of Congress is a Constitutional Crisis

Louie Gohmert discusses the implications of the FBI's actions during the 'Arctic Frost' investigation, which involved the subpoenaing of cell phone records from various members of Congress. This situation is presented as a significant constitutional crisis, raising concerns about privacy rights and the potential abuse of government power.

1. Subpoenas Issued: Jack Smith, appointed as Special Counsel, issued subpoenas for the cell phone records of several Republican members of Congress, including Gohmert himself, spanning nearly three months.

2. Constitutional Concerns: Gohmert asserts that the subpoenas represent a grave constitutional issue due to their lack of probable cause, which is normally required for search warrants under the Fourth Amendment.

3. Manipulation of the Grand Jury: He believes that the grand jury, composed largely of individuals who opposed Trump politically, was misled to prove a conspiracy narrative against him and his associates.

4. Potential Violations of Congressional Privilege: Gohmert emphasizes the importance of Congressional privilege in protecting information shared by constituents, particularly whistleblowers, which could be endangered if such records can be seized without proper legal justification.

5. Past Abuse of Power: The article recalls previous instances where the DOJ and FBI overstepped constitutional boundaries, such as the raid of Congressman William Jefferson's office. Gohmert argues that the current situation reflects an escalation in unauthorized government scrutiny.

6. Implications for Democracy: The overarching theme is that the Federal Government’s unchecked power could undermine the republican form of government, which relies on maintaining checks and balances.

7. Judicial Review: Gohmert advocates for courts to distinguish between lawful and unlawful subpoenas and emphasizes the necessity of protecting citizens’ rights from government overreach.

8. Historical Context: The article references Watergate as a historical comparison to illustrate the severity of the current situation, suggesting that the actions taken under the 'Arctic Frost' investigation are significantly more alarming.

Gohmert warns that these actions signify potential abuses of power that threaten the foundational principles of American democracy. The implications of such systemic issues extend beyond individual members of Congress, reflecting a broader threat to civil liberties and the proper functioning of government. He calls for accountability and reform to protect the constitutional rights of individuals against government overreach. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/arctic-frosts-spying-on-members-of-congress-is-a-constitutional-crisis/