The ‘No Kings’ Protests Against Democracy Itself

Following Donald Trump's significant victory in the 2024 presidential election against Kamala Harris, a wave of protests labeled “No Kings” erupted across the United States. These protests, which involve a multitude of leftist groups, are seen as ironic acts against democracy itself, primarily as they oppose a democratically elected president.

1. Election Results: Donald Trump won the 2024 election decisively, securing 312 Electoral College votes to Kamala Harris's 226 and receiving just under 77.3 million votes compared to her nearly 75 million.

2. Nature of Protests: Around 2,500 protests were organized by over 200 left-wing groups, including the ACLU and Antifa. Many prominent Democratic figures have expressed their support for these rallies, which have been referred to cynically by some as "Hate America" rallies.

3. Demographics of Protestors: The protests primarily feature older individuals, referred to as “Boomers,” alongside younger activists. The tone of these demonstrations is described as self-righteous and somewhat out of touch with mainstream concerns, as they often focus on grievances against Trump rather than specific policies.

4. Irony of the Theme: The central message of the “No Kings” protests is criticized as ironic since Trump is not a king but a democratically elected president who adheres to constitutional processes, unlike certain actions seen in other political contexts.

5. The Left's Perspective on Democracy: While proclaiming their commitment to democracy, the “No Kings” protestors are alleged to support undemocratic tactics when it serves their purposes, such as Kamala Harris being selected as a candidate without going through the democratic process.

6. Trump's Promises: Trump's election was based on a campaign focused on four main goals: border security, immigration control, opposition to "woke" ideology, and economic rejuvenation. The protests are, in part, reactions to these policies.

7. Contrast with Biden’s Rule: The article argues that while Trump is portrayed as a tyrant, the Biden administration's actions represent a more autocratic approach, involving censorship and political prosecution.

8. Rallying Call for Conservatives: There's a suggestion that conservatives should organize their protests and challenges as countermeasures to leftist activism, as the political landscape may offer more opportunities for dissent during the current administration.

9. Debate and Action: It is argued that civil discourse has limits and that, given the hostility toward differing opinions, conservatives may need to adopt more action-oriented strategies rather than relying solely on debate.

10. Cultural Reflection: The protests reflect broader societal and cultural divisions, with commentary pointing to a tendency among certain groups to engage in outrage without understanding the principles that underpin democratic systems.

The “No Kings” protests illuminate a complex interaction between protest culture and democratic values. While the rallies claim to stand against autocracy, they seem to reject the outcomes of democratic processes, highlighting a division in understanding what democracy entails. The conversation encourages a deeper reflection on how both sides engage with their political realities and the effectiveness of their strategies in the current political climate. 

https://amgreatness.com/2025/10/19/the-no-kings-protests-against-democracy-itself/