Miranda Devine discusses a concerning change in the attitudes of some Democrats, claiming that their unresolved feelings about former President Trump have transformed into a more dangerous form of criticism. This new phenomenon, termed "Trump Projection Disorder," reflects how Democrats have adopted extreme behaviors and accusations originally directed at Trump, showing desperation as they face political challenges.
1. Current Democratic Concerns:
• Democrats are increasingly fixated on trivial matters, such as a new ballroom associated with Trump, with thousands expressing outrage online over its existence.
• Commentary on the ballroom emphasizes how deeply Trump affects Democratic discussions.
2. Evolving Political Malice:
• Devine argues that what was previously referred to as Trump Derangement Syndrome has escalated in intensity and absurdity, now manifesting as Trump Projection Disorder.
• Democrats are accused of becoming mirrors of the behaviors they originally critiqued in Trump, adopting irrational and extreme reactions.
3. Extreme Democratic Candidates:
• The article highlights examples of Democratic candidates with troubling or extreme backgrounds:
• In Maine, a Senate candidate with a Nazi tattoo and a history of far-left affiliations is ahead in polls, while the party continues to support him.
• In Virginia, a candidate is reported to have made violent remarks about a Republican lawmaker, yet remains on the Democratic ticket without any disavowal from his party.
4. Rhetoric Against Republicans:
• Devine discusses the Democratic candidate’s violent rhetoric and links to troubling historical figures, noting a disconnect between their platform and public safety concerns.
• Media personalities and political figures accuse others of fear-mongering while downplaying their own candidates' extreme views.
5. Fearless Leadership and Change:
• While some Democrats mimic Trump’s style in their communications, Devine believes they misunderstand what makes Trump successful, attributing it to genuine policies rather than performative swearing.
• The attempt to imitate Trump’s boldness lacks the substantive policies or clarity that he offers, which could lead to further trouble for the Democratic party.
6. Growing Internal Conflicts:
• The piece indicates ongoing friction within the Democratic party, as younger, more radical candidates challenge traditional leadership, potentially leading to more chaos in their electoral strategies.
• Devine concludes that the strategy of adopting Trump-like rhetoric among Democrats is failing, emphasizing that their current path leads them further from a successful engagement with voters.
• As the party grapples with its identity and makes startling choices in candidates, the continuation of such tactics could predict further political decline.
This summary encapsulates the main arguments presented by Devine while bringing attention to the behavioral shifts noted within the Democratic party in response to Trump’s political presence.
No comments:
Post a Comment