Skip to main content

What Does the BBB Say About Medicaid for Illegal Immigrants?

Overview of the BBB and Medicaid Funding for Illegal Immigrants

- Senate passed the BBB today

- Focus on Medicaid funding for illegal immigrants

- Confusion surrounding future plans and funding

Background on Medicaid Funding for Illegal Immigrants

- Federal government does not directly fund Medicaid for illegal immigrants

- Some states use state funds to cover certain illegal immigrants

- California expanded Medicaid (Medi-Cal) to include all low-income immigrants

- This expansion resulted in a significant budget gap for California

California's Budget Changes

- Governor Newsom cut new enrollment for undocumented immigrants in Medi-Cal

- Existing enrolled adults (ages 19-59) will pay a $30 monthly premium starting in 2027

- Newsom's decision contradicts his earlier promise to cover all low-income residents

- A $12 billion deficit influenced these changes, removing pressures on citizen programs

Provisions in the BBB Related to Medicaid

- Two provisions addressed illegal immigrant coverage

- One aimed at cutting federal reimbursement for states funding coverage for illegal immigrants

- Concerns raised on states’ capacity to cover shortfalls without federal support

- California could lose up to $3 billion annually from these cuts

Senate Parliamentarian's Decisions

- Key provisions related to Medicaid funding were removed from the bill

- Decisions were based on what could be approved under reconciliation rules

- Cuts to non-citizen eligibility and funding percentages also eliminated

Current Confusions and Future Considerations

- Unclear effects of the remaining bill section on eligibility for illegal immigrants

- Ongoing complexities in determining potential coverage cuts

- Anticipation for further clarification and explanation of the bill’s impact 

https://hotair.com/john-s-2/2025/07/01/what-does-the-bbb-say-about-medicaid-for-illegal-immigrants-n3804379

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...