U. S. Rejection of WHO Amendments to Preserve Sovereignty
- U. S. government rejects WHO amendments to International Health Regulations (IHR).
- Decision aims to protect national sovereignty and individual liberties.
- Concerns raised over risks of global surveillance, censorship, and unchecked WHO power.
Why the U. S. Rejected the IHR Amendments
- IHR amendments give WHO expanded authority to declare emergencies and access health data.
- Critics label the amendments as a "technocratic control system. "
- Issues include:
- Increased surveillance through mandatory health data sharing.
- Censorship of dissent against WHO guidelines.
- Loss of sovereignty with compliance to WHO mandates.
- Kennedy warns against a future of constant surveillance.
Historical Context: Trump’s Exit to Biden’s U-Turn
- Rejection mirrors Trump's 2020 withdrawal from the WHO due to corruption.
- Biden administration initially supported IHR reforms for global health collaboration.
- Senate Republicans like Rubio criticize WHO’s pandemic response as politicized.
- Debate continues between pro-sovereignty and global health framework supporters.
WHO’s Defense
- WHO claims it does not control governments, serving only as an advisory body.
- Director-General asserts WHO's mission is to save lives through science.
- U. S. officials argue IHR’s vague language permits overreach in health measures.
Impending Deadline for Global Decisions
- December 1 deadline for WHO member states to accept or reject the amendments.
- Global activists are mobilizing against the proposals, fearing a “health security state. ”
Crossroads for Global Health and Freedom
- The U. S. stance highlights the conflict between maintaining sovereignty and embracing global governance.
- Nations face a critical decision on prioritizing democracy versus pandemic preparedness.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-07-22-us-rejects-who-amendments-to-protect-liberty.html
No comments:
Post a Comment