Skip to main content

Ketanji Brown Jackson Was Appointed To Be A Political Activist, Not A Judge

Supreme Court’s 2024 Term and Trump v. CASA Decision

- The Supreme Court's 2024 term has concluded, yet the Trump v. CASA decision remains a key topic in political discussions.

- The decision overturns lower courts' use of universal injunctions against executive power.

Ketanji Brown Jackson's Dissent

- Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote a dissent described as emotionally charged.

- She criticized the majority for limiting the ability of lower courts to challenge executive actions.

- Jackson views the ruling as a threat to the rule of law, claiming it allows the executive branch to violate personal liberties without checks.

Concerns Over Judicial Role

- Amy Coney Barrett argued that Jackson's view could damage confidence in judicial authority.

- Jackson’s dissent promotes a vision where the judiciary has great power over other branches, potentially undermining checks and balances established by the founders.

Implications of Jackson's View

- Jackson believes courts should have the authority to ensure compliance by all branches of government to the law.

- Critics argue this perspective risks creating a strong judiciary that eclipses the power of the executive and legislative branches.

Reaction to Jackson's Dissent

- The majority described her dissent as disconnected from legal precedents and established doctrines.

- Jackson's rhetoric and style have been compared to that of political commentators rather than a Supreme Court justice.

Conclusion on Jackson’s Judicial Role

- Despite occasional agreement on specific cases, Jackson is expected to pursue a leftist agenda that strays from constitutional principles. 

https://thefederalist.com/2025/07/02/ketanji-brown-jackson-was-appointed-to-be-a-political-activist-not-a-judge/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...
Post a Comment
Read more

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html
Post a Comment
Read more

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...
Post a Comment
Read more