Skip to main content

Here’s Why the Supreme Court Striking Down Nationwide Injunctions Won’t End the Judicial Insurrection

 Overview of Trump v. CASA Case

- The Supreme Court case addresses district court judges blocking Trump's policies.

- Justice Amy Coney Barrett criticized nationwide injunctions as violating the 1789 Judiciary Act.

- Nationwide injunctions offer broad relief based on just one successful plaintiff suit.

Key Points of the Ruling

- Justice Barrett’s ruling limits the use of universal injunctions.

- The ruling allows two remaining ways judges could still block Trump’s policies.

- The judicial insurrection continues, showcasing resistance to Trump's administration.

Class Action Lawsuits

- The ruling does not impact class action lawsuits.

- Justice Samuel Alito emphasized adherence to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

- He warned against judges certifying nationwide classes without strict compliance, which could revive universal injunctions.

Administrative Procedure Act

- The 1946 Administrative Procedure Act provides grounds for district court judges to challenge administration policies.

- A footnote in Barrett’s ruling suggests unresolved questions about the Act’s application.

- Potential lawsuits from leftist groups may challenge Trump’s actions under this Act.

Defying the Supreme Court

- Some district court judges may defy the Supreme Court’s rulings.

- Example: Judge Brian Murphy issued an injunction against Trump administration’s deportation actions despite the Supreme Court’s strike down.

- His actions highlight the authority some judges believe they possess.

Ongoing Legal Issues

- While Trump v. CASA addresses injunctions, questions remain about enforcing federal regulations or executive orders during legal challenges.

- Justice Kavanaugh stressed clarity, stability, and the importance of the Supreme Court’s role in these matters.

- The judicial insurrection remains a threat to Trump's administration and policies. 

https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/06/30/3-ways-judicial-insurrection-may-circumvent-supreme-courts-ruling-against-nationwide-injunctions/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...