Skip to main content

DOJ Concludes Illegal Entrants Can Be Prosecuted Anywhere in the U.S.

 June 21 Legal Opinion by the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC)

- OLC issued an opinion on "eluding inspection" under section 275(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

- This allows prosecution wherever illegal aliens are found, potentially causing self-deportation and undermining local sanctuary policies.

- Claims that illegal aliens aren't criminals are challenged by this interpretation.

Section 275 of the INA

- Makes it a crime for an alien to enter the U. S. illegally.

- Penalties include fines or imprisonment up to 6 months for first offenses and up to 2 years for subsequent offenses.

- Most prosecutions occur at the local level; it's commonly charged under section 275(a).

Details on Criminal Charges

- Every illegal entry can lead to potential charges under section 275(a)(1) and (2).

- Paragraph (1) charges are more straightforward; paragraph (2) raises questions about completeness of the offense once an alien eludes inspection.

Section 279 of the INA

- Defines jurisdiction for civil and criminal cases under INA.

- Prosecutions can occur anywhere in the U. S. where a violation may happen or where the person is apprehended.

U. S. v. Wissel Case

- A 1978 case previously stated that offenses under section 275(a)(2) were complete upon illegal crossing.

- This restricted prosecutions to locations where crossings occurred.

New OLC Opinion

- The 1978 opinion lacked independent examination of section 275(a)(2) as a continuing offense.

- The new opinion reversed the previous stance, allowing for prosecution beyond border areas.

- It acknowledges the ongoing duty for aliens to submit to inspection.

Judicial Warrants and Sanctuary Jurisdiction

- Sanctuary jurisdictions claim to comply with ICE but often impose burdensome requirements.

- ICE can obtain judicial warrants for criminal offenses like "eluding examination. ”

- Local ICE offices can now seek warrants from their area federal judges.

- This could change how local police respond to ICE requests.

Impact on Immigration Enforcement

- The opinion implies that illegal entry remains a criminal act until aliens are caught or self-deport.

- Increased prosecutions for section 275(a)(2) offenses expected across the U. S.

- Sanctuary jurisdictions may have to comply with judicial warrants, giving ICE more enforcement power.

- The potential for imprisonment may encourage illegal aliens to self-deport. 

https://cis.org/Arthur/DOJ-Concludes-Illegal-Entrants-Can-Be-Prosecuted-Anywhere-US

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...