Skip to main content

The Radical Left's New Lawfare Tactic

 Supreme Court Ruling on Universal Injunctions

- The Supreme Court's decision limits universal injunctions that allow judges to block executive actions.

- Seen as a victory for the Trump administration, enhancing its ability to enforce policies.

- The ruling dismisses about 340 nationwide injunctions filed against Trump's policies.

Reactions to the Ruling

- The political left, including the Huffington Post, expresses outrage over the decision.

- A notable dissent by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is cited, suggesting executive lawlessness may result.

- Justice Amy Coney Barrett refutes Jackson's argument stating it contradicts constitutional precedent.

Implications for Trump's Administration

- The Trump administration's defense against federal injunctions was strategically sound.

- The ruling secures more executive power and improves efficiency in law enforcement.

- By mid-May 2025, approximately 40 nationwide injunctions against Trump exist; many now dismissed.

Future Legal Strategies from the Left

- NPR discusses the radical left's new tactic: class action lawsuits.

- Legal experts predict a shift from universal injunctions to class actions for broader protection.

- Other potential strategies include state lawsuits and organizational standing for groups harmed by policies.

Ongoing Birthright Citizenship Issues

- Class-action lawsuits concerning birthright citizenship are anticipated following the ruling.

- An example includes the A. A. R. P. v. Trump case, which challenges the removal of Venezuelan nationals.

- The Supreme Court ruled to grant provisional relief in urgent immigration cases and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Organizational Responses

- Immigration rights groups adapted quickly, filing new class action lawsuits against Trump's immigration policies.

- Such organizations aim to halt deportations of children born to illegal immigrants as well as their families.

- Many lawsuits are being revised to align with the class action framework for federal court submissions.

Concluding Remarks

- The ruling's impact does not conclude the conflict; a legislative and judicial battle continues.

- The political left remains determined to challenge Trump’s administration through legal avenues despite electoral losses. 

https://www.malone.news/p/the-radical-lefts-new-lawfare-tactic?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=583200&post_id=167034056&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=1mr4m3&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...