Skip to main content

Justice Kagan’s Hypocrisy on Universal Injunctions

 Supreme Court Ruling Overview: Trump v. CASA

- The Supreme Court ruling ended claims of a "judicial insurrection" by President Trump's supporters.

- President Trump’s executive orders faced lawsuits that led to universal injunctions blocking his agenda.

Criticism of Universal Injunctions

- Many legal scholars and some Supreme Court justices, including Justice Kagan, have criticized universal injunctions.

- Justice Kagan expressed concerns that it isn't right for a single district judge to halt a nationwide policy indefinitely.

Majority Ruling Details

- Justice Amy Coney Barrett authored the ruling on December 22, 2023, affirming Kagan's stance against universal injunctions.

- The ruling suggested these injunctions exceed the authority given to federal courts by Congress.

- Despite this, Kagan did not join the Court’s majority and instead supported a dissenting opinion by Justice Sotomayor.

Dissenting Opinion Insights

- Justice Sotomayor accused the Trump administration of manipulating the system through Trump v. CASA to challenge district court jurisdiction.

- Kagan’s dissent is unusual, given her critical views on “forum shopping” and historical absence of universal injunctions from 1789 to 1963.

Controversy Behind Kagan's Decision

- Kagan’s choice to join the dissent raises questions about her motivations, hinting at political rather than legal reasoning.

- Her stance is seen as inconsistent, given her previous statements against universal injunctions.

Concerns about Judicial Principles

- The majority ruling poses risks by allowing the Executive Branch potential unchecked power.

- The dissent from Jackson reflects strong disagreement with the majority opinion and indicates a lack of respect for the justices involved.

Conclusion on Kagan's Position

- Kagan's position is perceived as politically motivated, suggesting she adjusts her views based on who occupies the presidency.

- Hypocrisy in her judicial philosophy is noted, tied to political context rather than a consistent legal framework.

https://spectator.org/justice-kagans-hypocrisy-on-universal-injunctions/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...