Skip to main content

North Carolina Supreme Court rules federal vaccine immunity doesn’t trump parental rights

 The North Carolina Supreme Court has ruled on a significant case regarding parental rights in relation to vaccination without consent. The case has broader implications for public health mandates and individual freedoms.

1. Case Overview:

• The Supreme Court of North Carolina reinstated a lawsuit claiming that a school and a medical group vaccinated a 14-year-old boy without his parents' consent.

• The court found that federal laws providing immunity to vaccine administrators do not protect against claims of constitutional rights violations.

2. Federal Vaccine Immunity Challenge:

• The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act typically shields healthcare providers from liability during public health emergencies.

• The court ruled that while the PREP Act protects against claims of loss, it does not apply to constitutional harms, such as violations of parental rights.

3. Constitutional Rights Emphasis:

• Chief Justice Paul Newby asserted that protecting the constitutional rights of bodily integrity and parental authority is crucial.

• This ruling allows the case to proceed, differentiating between claims of physical harm and constitutional issues.

4. Concerns About Vaccine Mandates:

• A declassified 2021 intelligence report indicated that vaccine mandates might provoke violence from extremists, highlighting tensions in society regarding vaccination policies.

• This context adds to the ongoing national debate over health mandates and personal freedoms.

5. Judicial and Public Health Intersection:

• The case illustrates the conflict between pandemic emergency powers and the protection of individual liberties.

• The ruling challenges previous understandings of federal supremacy during emergencies, affirming that state laws regarding parental consent still hold significant weight.

6. Future Implications:

• The ruling is seen as a potential turning point for parental rights in the face of emergency health measures.

• Advocates argue that this decision may redefine how legal protections are enforced during health crises.

The North Carolina Supreme Court's decision underscores a significant legal and cultural debate over vaccination protocols, parental rights, and constitutional freedoms. As the case moves forward, it may set important precedents regarding the balance between public health safety and individual rights. The outcome could influence future government responses to health emergencies without compromising fundamental freedoms.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-05-29-federal-vaccine-immunity-doesnt-trump-parental-rights.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...
Post a Comment
Read more

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html
Post a Comment
Read more

EU Ambassador & Munich Security Conference Chair Headline Chinese Communist Party Influence Event.

  The Vice Chairman of the Munich Security Conference and a former Ambassador of the European Union to the U.S. headlined an event sponsored by a leading Chinese Communist Party influence group The China-United States Exchange Foundation (CUSEF) CUSEF has been identified by the US government as part of China’s “United Front” which works “to co-opt and neutralize sources of potential opposition to the policies and authority of its ruling Communist Party.” O’Sullivan Director General of the Institute of International and European Affairs Has held a variety of influential positions within the European Union including Chief Operating Officer of the European External Action Service (EEAS) Ruge also has ties to the EU’s military infrastructure Vice Chairman of the Munich Security Conference https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/10/20/eu-amb-and-munich-chair-headline-cusef-webinar/
Post a Comment
Read more