David Bell discusses the issues surrounding the World Health Organization's (WHO) Pandemic Agreement, highlighting misleading claims and the implications for global health.
• The WHO is compared to a car salesman, using flawed arguments to promote the Pandemic Agreement at the World Health Assembly.
• Concerns exist that the WHO relies on false claims, such as rising pandemic risks, expected financial returns from preparedness, and the natural origin of Covid-19.
• The article suggests that influential interests, particularly in the private sector, drive the WHO's current agenda, moving away from traditional health priorities.
• Data show that infectious disease mortality has declined over the past century, contradicting the WHO's focus on hypothetical threats like "Disease X. "
• The WHO's financial projections for pandemic preparedness are criticized as exaggerated, lacking substantive evidence.
• Bell argues that the WHO has shifted from addressing major health issues such as tuberculosis and malaria to promoting corporate interests, losing its focus on general public health and longevity.
• He suggests that better investment in health infrastructure and preventative care could lead to improved health outcomes, reducing the need for pandemic responses.
• The article concludes that the Pandemic Agreement is part of a broader agenda that diverts attention and resources from genuine public health improvements.
The WHO's Pandemic Agreement is seen as a distraction from more pressing health issues, with claims that lack credibility. The author calls for a reevaluation of global health policies to prioritize real health improvements over corporate interests and misinformation.
https://brownstone.org/articles/the-false-claims-of-whos-pandemic-agreement/
No comments:
Post a Comment