Skip to main content

The False Claims of WHO’s Pandemic Agreement

David Bell discusses the issues surrounding the World Health Organization's (WHO) Pandemic Agreement, highlighting misleading claims and the implications for global health.

• The WHO is compared to a car salesman, using flawed arguments to promote the Pandemic Agreement at the World Health Assembly.

• Concerns exist that the WHO relies on false claims, such as rising pandemic risks, expected financial returns from preparedness, and the natural origin of Covid-19.

• The article suggests that influential interests, particularly in the private sector, drive the WHO's current agenda, moving away from traditional health priorities.

• Data show that infectious disease mortality has declined over the past century, contradicting the WHO's focus on hypothetical threats like "Disease X. "

• The WHO's financial projections for pandemic preparedness are criticized as exaggerated, lacking substantive evidence.

• Bell argues that the WHO has shifted from addressing major health issues such as tuberculosis and malaria to promoting corporate interests, losing its focus on general public health and longevity.

• He suggests that better investment in health infrastructure and preventative care could lead to improved health outcomes, reducing the need for pandemic responses.

• The article concludes that the Pandemic Agreement is part of a broader agenda that diverts attention and resources from genuine public health improvements.

The WHO's Pandemic Agreement is seen as a distraction from more pressing health issues, with claims that lack credibility. The author calls for a reevaluation of global health policies to prioritize real health improvements over corporate interests and misinformation. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-false-claims-of-whos-pandemic-agreement/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...
Post a Comment
Read more

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html
Post a Comment
Read more

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...
Post a Comment
Read more