Skip to main content

Newsom Hits The Gas

 California Governor Gavin Newsom has shifted his position on oil refineries, moving from a critical stance to a more supportive one as he prepares for a potential presidential run in 2028.

• Recently, Newsom advocated for allowing oil refineries to operate profitably, contrasting his earlier comments about preventing high profits from Big Oil. Last summer, he criticized refiners for making excessive profits and implemented measures to curb them.

• Following Newsom's legislation aimed at limiting profits, Phillips 66 announced the closure of its Los Angeles refinery complex, leading to concerns about a diminishing number of refineries in California. This closure will be the fourth since 2020, leaving only around a dozen refineries to produce the state's unique gasoline blend.

• In a recent letter to energy regulators, Newsom urged them to support refiners and ensure they see value in their services as demand for fossil fuels declines.

• Valero’s CEO remarked on the strict regulatory environment in California, which has resulted from two decades of policies aimed at reducing reliance on fossil fuels.

• The reduction of oil refineries could severely impact California’s economy, causing job losses, increased gasoline prices, and decreased tax revenue.

• California lacks pipeline connections to other regions, making it heavily dependent on its own refineries for oil supply. Any state takeover of these facilities may not solve the underlying problems.

Governor Newsom's recent actions indicate a shift towards supporting oil refineries in California, driven by economic considerations and his political aspirations. If the current regulatory climate continues, it could lead to serious consequences for the state’s economy and energy supply.

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/04/29/newsom-hits-the-gas/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...
Post a Comment
Read more

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html
Post a Comment
Read more

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...
Post a Comment
Read more