Yes, Let’s Give An America ‘Without A Meaningful Government’ A Try

This article discusses the criticisms made by university professors regarding the Trump administration's approach to government. The professors argue that eliminating certain government functions could lead to a harmful lack of regulation. The editorial board counters their points by defending the idea of limited government and emphasizing the effectiveness of free markets.

1. Love for Government: The authors express concern about those who favor government intervention and believe in its inherent necessity. They argue this perspective is misguided and limits freedom.

2. Critique of Shapiro and Tomain: Professors Sidney Shapiro and Joseph P. Tomain argue that President Trump's agenda to reduce government could lead to unregulated markets. The editorial board believes they misunderstand the benefits of a free market.

3. Free Market Regulation: Political science professor James Rogers states that free markets effectively regulate themselves. The pursuit of self-interest by business owners, when operating in a competitive market, can actually benefit the public.

4. Federal Bureaucracy Defense: Shapiro and Tomain defend bureaucratic agencies and suggest that eliminating them is unprecedented. However, the editorial board argues that all government entities should be accountable and can be dismantled if necessary.

5. Effectiveness of Government Projects: While acknowledging significant government projects, the board poses questions about their efficiency. It criticizes previous projects, like the Hoover Dam, as potential misallocations of resources.

6. Waste and Inefficiency: The piece highlights the waste and inefficiencies tied to government projects, using examples like California's high-speed rail and comparing it unfavorably to private sector initiatives.

7. Regulation's Economic Impact: The proponents of regulation often ignore the negative effects it has on economic growth, as every regulatory position may correspond to job losses in the private sector.

8. Balancing Government and Markets: In their book, the professors suggest finding a balance between government and markets but do not explain how this balance should be determined or by whom.

9. Efficacy of Government: The board underscores that while government is necessary for maintaining order, it must be closely monitored to ensure it does not infringe on rights or liberties. This viewpoint is rooted in historical examples of government overreach.

The editorial board strongly advocates for a reduced role of government in economic life, believing that a free market can thrive without extensive government regulation. They propose that government should focus solely on enforcing laws and maintaining civil order, thus allowing individuals and businesses the freedom to prosper. Overall, the piece calls for a critical reassessment of the role government plays in citizens' lives, affirming that less government could lead to a more liberated society. 

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/03/27/yes-lets-give-an-america-without-a-meaningful-government-a-try/