On Thursday, President Trump signed an executive order cutting federal ties with the major Democrat law firm Perkins Coie and the Spygate incubator. He based this decision on the firm's partisan dishonesty and discrimination against sex and race.
• The president's decision is seen as a valid legal reason to refuse collaboration with any organization, notably extending to entities like the American Bar Association (ABA).
• The ABA is criticized for engaging in racial and sexual discrimination and is viewed as highly partisan, promoting agendas aligned with the Democrat Party.
• It plays a significant role in shaping the legal profession in the U. S. by accrediting law schools, rating judges, and influencing lawyer discipline.
• Concerns are raised that the ABA promotes a legal system that opposes the U. S. Constitution, as evidenced by federal judges it has supported who do not align with constitutional principles.
• There is a call for not just the Trump administration but all lawmakers committed to constitutional governance to replace the ABA with institutions that honor the original Constitution.
• Michael Fragoso, a former legal liaison with the ABA, advocates halting the ABA's role in prescreening judicial nominees due to its partisanship; studies indicate a consistent bias against Republican nominees.
• The ABA is accused of increasingly partisan behavior, evidenced during both the Biden and Trump administrations, including supporting claims related to the Equal Rights Amendment and racial discrimination.
• The ABA holds accreditation power over almost all legal degree programs, thereby monopolizing entry into the legal profession, while pushing an agenda centered on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).
• The ABA's demands for DEI education have led some law schools to replace constitutional law courses with DEI courses, threatening the foundation of constitutional education.
• Given its actions, many believe the ABA needs to be dissolved rather than merely reformed to maintain respect for the Constitution.
The current legal structure, heavily influenced by the ABA, poses a risk to America's foundational principles. To protect the Constitution, swift action is needed to dismantle the ABA's stronghold over legal institutions. This includes implementing alternative accreditation systems and creating agencies focused on constitutional law. The future of the legal profession depends on developing judges and lawyers committed to the Constitution, ensuring that current and future justices can uphold constitutional values.
No comments:
Post a Comment