Skip to main content

The Swirling Vortex of Weaponised Lawfare

 The article discusses the intertwining issues of lawfare, the judiciary’s failures, and the political landscape in the context of the United States, particularly regarding the Trump administration and broader judicial actions.

1. Judicial Failures During Covid: The courts did not protect rights and liberties during the Covid years, leading to a perception of judicial failure.

2. Threats to Democracy: Technocratic elites are viewed as a greater threat to democracy than populist movements, with judges seen as the last bastion defending gains made by social justice movements.

3. Judicial Fallibility: Judges are not infallible. Historical cases in Australia illustrate that wrongful convictions can and do occur, and personal biases can influence judicial outcomes.

4. Corruption and Oversight: There are mechanisms for addressing judicial incompetence, but incidents of corruption, such as a recent scandal involving a judge in India, highlight weaknesses in oversight.

5. Judicial Overreach: Questions are raised about judges’ self-discipline and whether they may overstep their boundaries, especially when balancing the urgency of executive actions.

6. The Political Landscape: A significant ideological disconnect exists between judges and public sentiment, as seen in the political donations of American law professors and judges’ decisions aligned with specific political ideologies.

7. National Injunctions: The article notes how district court judges can issue national injunctions, indicating potential judicial overreach and suggesting that these decisions can be influenced by political biases.

8. Calls for Reform: Proposed reforms include forming a three-judge panel from different circuits to handle presidential order challenges, which may help restore balance among branches of government.

9. Global Context: Similar issues are noted in other democracies, such as Australia and Canada, where courts are viewed as interfering with elected officials' powers and exacerbating political crises.

10. Elite Contempt for the People: There is a growing sense of contempt among elites, including judges, towards the general public and their political choices, contrasting with the direct engagement seen with populist leaders.

The article argues that there is a troubling trend in how judicial systems, influenced by ideological biases and elite perspectives, are affecting democratic governance. It calls for reforms to ensure accountability and align the judiciary more closely with the people’s sentiments, suggesting that unchecked judicial power may risk fundamental democratic principles. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-swirling-vortex-of-weaponised-lawfare/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...