Executive Orders Are Not a Panacea for America

 David Thunder discusses the excitement among conservatives following Donald Trump's election, highlighting key policy changes he may bring. However, he warns against getting lost in the moment and urges a broader perspective on the implications of such centralization of power.

1. Conservative Celebration:

The return of Donald Trump to the presidency is met with enthusiasm among conservatives, particularly in contrast to the policies proposed by Kamala Harris, such as the ending of certain government programs and reducing censorship.

2. Polarized Society:

The U. S. is increasingly divided into progressives and conservatives, leading to fierce competition for federal power, especially during presidential elections.

3. Growing Federal Power:

The significant control of federal power over various aspects of life puts everyday freedoms at risk, with political outcomes hinging greatly on the president's decisions.

4. Messianic Presidency:

There is a tendency to see the president as a savior figure who will fight against powerful interests, such as Big Pharma and bureaucracy, which can lead to unrealistic expectations.

5. Centralized Political Systems:

In a centralized political environment, desiring a strong candidate is rational. However, waits for reform to return power to the people often rely on further centralization, which can unwittingly increase government power.

6. Temporary Change:

Even assuming a wise president restores common sense policies, their time in office is limited. Future leaders can reverse such reforms with new executive orders, leading to an ongoing cycle of instability.

7. Instability of Reforms:

Political changes, despite being impactful, remain unstable in a centralized system, as exemplified by potential shifts back and forth in policies associated with executive orders.

8. Call for Structural Reform:

To promote long-term health and stability in the U. S. , more extensive structural reforms are needed to weaken both Congress and the presidency, returning authority to state and local governments.

9. Local Solutions:

By devolving power to local governments, divisive issues can be addressed more effectively, allowing communities to adapt solutions that best suit their needs.

For those invested in the future of America, advocating for changes that decentralize power is crucial. This would help mitigate the instability and polarization seen in U. S. politics, allowing for more customized and effective governance at local levels.

https://brownstone.org/articles/executive-orders-are-not-a-panacea-for-america/