Skip to main content

Egalitarian Interventionists: Why Politicians Love “Equality”

 The term "equality" is often viewed as an unquestionable good in modern Western society, especially in America, where it's considered part of the national identity that "all men are created equal. " However, the concept is complex and heavily debated among politicians and scholars.

1. Definition and Usage of Equality: Politicians appreciate "equality" because it seems just, is difficult to define, and is hard to achieve. It can refer to fairness before the law or broader concepts like egalitarianism which includes “equality of outcome” or “equality of opportunity. ”

2. Rule of Law vs. Egalitarianism: Equality before the law aims for impartiality in justice but is often opposed to egalitarian principles, which seek equal outcomes and may require treating individuals unequally to achieve these ends.

3. Human Nature and Scarcity: Human diversity and individuality make true equality nearly impossible. According to scholars like Rothbard, true equality would mean complete uniformity among individualsa situation devoid of personal characteristics and creativity.

4. Perception of Equality by Politicians: Many politicians might favor the idea of "equality" because it allows them to justify state interventions, claiming that disparities in society reflect injustices. This allows them to position themselves as defenders of justice while perpetuating a system where they hold significant power.

5. Statistical Measures of Inequality: Statistical measures can drive political agendas, as any observed difference is seen as an injustice that requires correction, justifying continued state intervention and power acquisition.

6. Historical Context and Consequences: Historical attempts to accomplish egalitarianism often resulted in greater state control and oppression rather than genuine equality. Figures like Mao in China believed that continuous revolution was necessary to create an egalitarian society, which often led to tragedy and hardship.

7. The Irony of Equality in Governance: Achieving equality often necessitates a powerful elite to enforce fairness through coercive means, ironically leading to increased inequality of power and privilege among individuals.

The pursuit of egalitarianism, often cloaked in the language of "equality," cannot be realized without significant societal and legal consequences. Politicians exploit the notion of equality to justify their power and actions, yet the reality is that not only is true equality unachievable in diverse societies, but striving for it may enable greater inequality through state intervention. The dilemma of balancing rule of law and egalitarian ideals remains a contentious issue in political discourse. 

https://mises.org/mises-wire/egalitarian-interventionists-why-politicians-love-equality

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...