Skip to main content

Covid Response at Five Years: The First Amendment Versus the U.S. Security State

 This document discusses how the Covid pandemic led to a significant attack on First Amendment rights in the United States. It describes a coordinated effort by government officials and health agencies to control information, suppress dissent, and evade accountability for their roles in the pandemic.

• A virus from a foreign adversary sparked a domestic crisis that allowed the U. S. government to expand its power.

• Bureaucrats coerced private companies to align with government directives, restricting what people could share about the crisis.

• Key figures in public health were implicated in the virus's creation and subsequently worked to cover up their involvement.

• They manipulated scientific findings through bribes and targeted journalists who questioned the narrative.

• A shadow government emerged that bypassed normal accountability mechanisms, impacting civil liberties heavily.

• The internet, once seen as a tool for free expression, was weaponized against dissidents, leading to increased censorship.

• The Democratic Party shifted from supporting an open internet to combatting perceived disinformation.

• During the Covid response, First Amendment rights were significantly undermined, framing dissent as a threat to democracy.

• Government officials suppressed discussion about the origins of Covid, particularly the lab-leak hypothesis.

• An email from January 2020 warned of potential implications for Anthony Fauci regarding funding that may have contributed to the virus's origin.

• Research funding for gain-of-function studies at the Wuhan Institute of Virology raised concerns about safety and accountability.

• Fauci and his associates engaged in efforts to silence discussions around the virus's origins, leading to fears for their reputations and careers.

• Discussions among virologists reflected deep concerns that the virus appeared engineered, but political ramifications influenced the scientific narrative.

• The drafting of contradictory scientific papers and avoidance of official communication channels reveals ongoing cover-up strategies amidst rising tensions.

The narrative emphasizes a troubling trend of censorship and encroachment on free expression in the face of the Covid pandemic. It highlights how the government's response involved tactics that undermined foundational democratic principles in an effort to maintain control and mitigate reputational risks. The evolution of this situation showcases the delicate balance between public health, government authority, and individual rights. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/covid-response-at-five-years-the-first-amendment-versus-the-u-s-security-state/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...