Skip to main content

Collusion, Coercion, and the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Directives

 Concerns have been raised about unelected regulators and global financial firms using people's money to pressure businesses into addressing climate change and social issues through Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) initiatives. This has particularly impacted the energy sector and financial stability in Europe.

• The EU is enforcing ESG mandates via the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directives (CSRD), which apply to both European and U. S. -based companies operating in the EU.

• A coalition of state financial officers, including the author, has urged President Trump to investigate the CSRD under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, arguing it imposes unfair burdens on U. S. businesses.

• The CSRD requires companies to detail their ESG impacts and establish climate change plans, even mandating disclosures about their supply chains.

• The introduction of "double materiality" expands reporting obligations beyond traditional financial risks to include societal impacts, complicating compliance for U. S. firms.

• The CSR's influence extends to U. S. companies, undermining their sovereignty.

• Many U. S. financial institutions are distancing themselves from ESG practices due to their negative economic effects, while the EU remains committed to such policies.

• Legal challenges are expected as the CSRD invites frivolous lawsuits based on speculative climate assumptions.

• The EU’s ESG policies have already harmed European economies, and there are calls within Europe for a delay in the CSRD's implementation.

The U. S. must oppose the EU's ESG directives to safeguard American businesses, uphold market principles, and influence European policy reconsideration. 

https://realclearwire.com/articles/2025/02/27/collusion_coercion_and_the_eus_corporate_sustainability_directives_1094273.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...
Post a Comment
Read more

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html
Post a Comment
Read more

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...
Post a Comment
Read more