Skip to main content

President Trump Plans for 25% Border Security Tariffs on Mexico and Canada Remain Set to Begin Saturday

President Trump announced plans to implement 25 percent tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico starting Saturday, January 31, 2025. These tariffs are seen as part of a dual approach: the long-term MARCRO tariffs focused on economic fairness and the more urgent border security tariffs aimed primarily at national security and combating fentanyl distribution. The media has reacted strongly to this announcement, but Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnik has explained the reasons behind the urgency of these measures. Trump explained that the tariffs are necessary due to illegal migration, drug issues, and trade deficits with these countries. While he mentioned that these tariffs could increase over time, he was ambiguous about whether they would include Canadian oil imports.

Additionally, Trump hinted at potential actions regarding China due to their involvement in fentanyl distribution but did not provide specifics on upcoming tariffs. The announcement comes amid negotiations with Canada and Mexico, where officials are trying to convince the Trump administration to enhance border security to avoid tariffs. Both countries have warned that they would retaliate if the tariffs are imposed.

There are opinions within the community that favor even higher tariffs, suggesting 100 percent tariffs on all imported goods. Advocates argue that such measures would bring back manufacturing jobs in the U. S. and change the current economic situation. They believe that previous data from 2017 to 2020 showed that targeted tariffs did not raise prices for consumers, and recent sanctions on Russia have provided further justification for implementing strict tariffs. They argue that these tariffs could redirect wealth back to the American middle class and support reindustrialization.

Several comments reflect on historical perspectives regarding the fentanyl trade and relationships between nations, mainly focusing on the past interactions between the U. S. , Britain, and China. Some commenters draw parallels between historical events and current policies, suggesting people educate themselves on history and the real nature of international friendships. Debates regarding U. S. foreign policy, military interventions, and historical relationships with countries like Russia and China are also part of the conversation, with varying opinions on the complexities of those relationships.

Discussions extend into criticisms of how history is taught in schools and how propaganda shapes public perception about nations and their actions over time. Various commenters argue about the motives of countries such as China regarding their trade practices and position in global economics.

Overall, the dialogue conveys a mixture of support for Trump's tariffs and broader discussions about historical context, international relations, and the implications of U. S. policymaking on its foreign partners. There are repeated calls for individuals to question mainstream narratives and understand the deeper historical roots of America’s current political landscape. 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/01/31/president-trump-plans-for-25-border-security-tariffs-on-mexico-and-canada-remain-set-to-begin-saturday/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...