Skip to main content

Gabbard’s Senate Critics Are More Interested In Protecting America’s Spy Agencies Than Fixing Them

 Tulsi Gabbard, President Trump’s choice to lead the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, has openly criticized America’s surveillance powers. During her Senate confirmation hearing, senators questioned her about the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), particularly its misuse to spy on Americans and on Trump’s 2016 campaign. Section 702 of this law enables federal agencies to collect communications of noncitizens abroad without a warrant, while allegedly protecting Americans from surveillance. However, the CIA was caught using this law to spy on Americans in 2022.

While in Congress, Gabbard supported reforms to FISA and sought to revoke the Patriot Act. At the hearing, she faced pressure from senators to clarify her current stance on the law. When discussing FISA reforms, Senator Mark Warner interrupted her attempt to explain her views. Senators John Cornyn and Mike Rounds also pressured her to express support for FISA, emphasizing its role in national security while stressing the need for protections of civil liberties.

Gabbard was also questioned about Edward Snowden, who gained attention for leaking classified information in 2013. She stated that while Snowden broke the law, he also revealed illegal and unconstitutional government programs, which led to reforms. Gabbard, who has praised Snowden in the past, also indicated she would not push for his pardon if confirmed as DNI. Senators hounded her to label Snowden as a “traitor,” which she did not do.

The hearing highlighted concerns over the misuse of surveillance by U. S. agencies, which have shifted focus from foreign adversaries to domestic political opponents. The FBI's involvement in various controversies, including spying on Trump’s campaign and targeting specific groups, showed a pattern of politicization within intelligence agencies. Critics noted the lack of questioning from senators about how to prevent these abuses in the future, indicating a preference for protecting the current system rather than reforming it.

Gabbard's skepticism towards the surveillance powers of U. S. intelligence agencies is presented as justified given the documented abuses. The commentary suggests that any Republican who does not share this skepticism should not be in public office.

https://thefederalist.com/2025/01/30/gabbards-senate-critics-are-more-interested-in-protecting-americas-spy-agencies-than-fixing-them/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html

The Biden-Harris White House Has An Iranian Spy Leaking U.S. Intelligence In It

 The question is, how did classified intelligence from the United States, showing Israeli military movements that suggest broader action against Iran, get to Tehran? The answer raises uncomfortable questions for the Biden-Harris White House, which has opposed Israel every step of the way in responding to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. Defying Biden got Israel the entire leadership of Hezbollah and Hamas, with the ultimate threat still looming: Iran and its nuclear program. Operations against Iran are being assessed also because Iran has started firing ballistic missiles into Israel, targeting civilian centers across the country. If Israel is close to launching a broader offensive against Iran, leaking U.S. intelligence would be a way to both try and deter Israel and give more warning to Iran. In 2012, similar allegations were made against the Obama administration when U.S. intelligence leaks showed that Israel was working towards using "Azerbaijan as a base of operations in the event...