Skip to main content

Will Dems Disrupt Certification of Trump’s Triumph?

 When the Electoral College confirmed Donald Trump’s victory over Kamala Harris on December 17, many thought the certification would be straightforward. However, Democrats have a history of attempting to block Republican victories. The ongoing debate includes claims that Trump should not hold office due to Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, with some arguing he is an insurrectionist.

Some critics, like lawyers Evan Davis and David Schulte, labeled Trump as an “oath-breaking insurrectionist” in a recent piece, asserting that there is overwhelming evidence against him, despite the fact that he has never been charged with insurrection. They reference previous forums that allegedly labeled Trump as guilty, but these include his impeachment trial, which acquitted him, and other decisions that were later rejected.

Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin expressed strong views on the role of Congress in possibly preventing Trump from taking office again, suggesting that Congress would be responsible for communicating disqualification to supporters on January 6, 2025. There are concerns that he and other left-leaning Democrats may try to disrupt the certification process again. The Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022, however, makes it harder for such disruptions to occur by requiring more members from both chambers of Congress to challenge electors.

Additionally, Evans and Schulte's claims seem to lack credible evidence, as they argue that because Trump was not formally charged, it would somehow invalidate the electoral votes. They misinterpret the law, claiming that voting for a disqualified candidate does not constitute a regular vote.

Furthermore, the ECRA aims to clarify the Vice President's role in determining elector disputes, indicating that Kamala Harris will not have sole power over these decisions during the certification process. Analysts note that the ongoing rhetoric around Trump continues to reflect a lack of critical reasoning among some of his detractors.

In summary, discussions surrounding Trump’s eligibility, particularly concerning Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, reveal significant divisions and strategies among Democrats in the face of ongoing electoral processes. The hope remains that absurd claims will not derail the electoral system. 

https://spectator.org/will-dems-disrupt-certification-of-trumps-triumph/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...
Post a Comment
Read more

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies

  Multiple U.S. states governed by Republicans are withdrawing state funds from BlackRock's management, as they disapprove of the ESG investment policies of the world's top asset manager, the Financial Times reports. In recent weeks, Louisiana, South Carolina, Utah, and Arkansas have announced they would divest funds from... For months now, Republican states have said they would not do business anymore with asset managers who have ESG-aligned investment policies, which, the states say, show that those financial firms are boycotting the oil and gas industry. Texas is leading the campaign against this movement The Lone Star State published a list of financial firms that could be banned from doing business with Texas, its state pension funds, and local governments. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html
Post a Comment
Read more

EU Ambassador & Munich Security Conference Chair Headline Chinese Communist Party Influence Event.

  The Vice Chairman of the Munich Security Conference and a former Ambassador of the European Union to the U.S. headlined an event sponsored by a leading Chinese Communist Party influence group The China-United States Exchange Foundation (CUSEF) CUSEF has been identified by the US government as part of China’s “United Front” which works “to co-opt and neutralize sources of potential opposition to the policies and authority of its ruling Communist Party.” O’Sullivan Director General of the Institute of International and European Affairs Has held a variety of influential positions within the European Union including Chief Operating Officer of the European External Action Service (EEAS) Ruge also has ties to the EU’s military infrastructure Vice Chairman of the Munich Security Conference https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/10/20/eu-amb-and-munich-chair-headline-cusef-webinar/
Post a Comment
Read more