Influenza is rare, loads more agents causing the same signs and symptoms are lumped under the appalling term “flu”, and population interventions such as inactivated vaccines do not stand a chance against a relatively rare moving target like influenza.
We have published posts presenting evidence that the influenza threat has been inflated.
We wrote protocols and published reviews on the effects of influenza vaccines on children, adults, asthmatics, the elderly, and those who care for the elderly.
The so what is that randomised placebo-controlled trials give you a good idea of the incidence of influenza.
The trials spanned 50 years of data, so we had all the highs, the lows, and the maybes and even 2 influenza pandemics.
Once we started looking at the verified influenza deaths in the placebo arm, we saw that the number of cases was in the hundreds.
So influenza is rare, loads more agents causing the same signs, symptoms are lumped under the appalling term "Flu," and population interventions such as inactivated vaccines do not stand a chance against a relatively rare moving target like influenza.
Trials are studies where researchers can control things, verify, and follow up on cases. The placebo arm incidence is essential for an accurate view of what is happening. Models are not required. Once we started looking at the verified influenza deaths in the placebo arm, we saw that the number of cases was in the hundreds. Complications were very rare; for deaths, we found zilch—certainly not the figures put forward by the CDC, which not even Anthony Fauci believed. This fits with the data we showed here and here.
https://brownstone.org/articles/is-the-influenza-threat-exaggerated/
No comments:
Post a Comment