Skip to main content

DOJ Dusts Off Civil War-Era Statute to Replace 1512(c)(2)

 Obsessed with targeting Trump supporters, the DOJ is now charging multiple defendants with a Civil War-era statute-18 U.S.C. 372-which punishes those who intimidate "Officers of the United States" from their posts.

Title 18 U.S.C. 372 punishes conspiracies "To prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof, or to induce by like means any officer of the United States to leave the place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed[.]" The DOJ's position is that Members of Congress hold the "Offices" and are the "Officers of the United States" that are covered by Section 372 and, accordingly, that J6ers can be prosecuted for allegedly causing their evacuation from Capitol Hill.

A Member of Congress does not receive a "Commission" because he or she, unlike federal judges, executive branch appointees, and military officers, is not an "Officer of the United States" and does not hold an "Office, trust, or place confidence."

In court filings, the DOJ has not disputed that, under the Constitution, Members of Congress are not "Officers of the United States." Instead, the DOJ argues that the 1861 Congress that enacted Section 372 used the term "Officer of the United States" in a sense broader than the technical, constitutional definition.

Binding Supreme Court precedent from the 19th century holds that, when used in federal criminal statutes, the terms "Office," "Officer," and "Officer of the United States," absent unambiguous language to the contrary, refer to individuals who received positions via the Appointments Clause of the Constitution.

In one of those cases decided in 1878, United States v. Germaine, a surgeon hired by the Commissioner of Pensions was indicted for extortion while serving as, in the words of the statute, an "Officer of the United States." Arguing for the indictment's dismissal, the surgeon argued that because he was not appointed to his position pursuant to the Appointments Clause, he could not be convicted of violating a statute, which applied only to "Officers of the United States." The Supreme Court agreed, ruling that absent unambiguous language to the contrary, the term "Officer of the United States," when used in criminal statutes, is limited to individuals appointed pursuant to the Appointments Clause.

This statute punishes conspiracies aimed at preventing individuals "From accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States[.]" Members of Congress, obviously, do not "Accept" their positions-instead, they assume or take office.

https://www.declassified.live/p/guest-column-doj-dusts-off-civil 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fauci Files Reveal Pfizer Helped Biden Rig 2020 Election

 Pfizer secretly colluded with Joe Biden's team to help him rig the 2020 election against Trump, according to new Fauci documents. In his new book, "On Call," Fauci admits that Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, called him the night after Biden was declared the winner of the election, to inform him of Pfizer's "Game-changing results" from the rigged mRNA trial. "On November 7, after the absentee ballots were counted, Joe Biden was declared the winner of the presidential election. It was the very next night that Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, called me away from my neighbors' fire pit to inform me about the game-changing results from the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial. I finally thought we had truly turned a corner in defeating this terrible disease." Today reports: In another interesting tidbit, Fauci discusses Trump's FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn declaring that he would not go along with the Trump Administration's plan to roll out the vac...
Post a Comment
Read more

FDA & U.S. Postal Service Linked to Black Market Abortion Pill Cartels.

 Mexico-based drug cartels facilitating an increase in unauthorized, self-conducted abortions in the United States continue unimpeded partly due to insufficient regulation by the Food and Drug Administration and the United States Postal Service, according to a report by the American Life League. Katie Brown, ALL's national director, criticizes the FDA and USPS for failing to adequately regulate the distribution and screening of abortion-inducing drugs like Mifepristone and Misoprostol. Subscribe here The report, titled Beneath the Surface: Exposing the Abortion Pill Drug Cartel, highlights the operations of Las Libres, a Mexico-based organization that advocates for universal abortion access. It promotes the distribution of abortion pills through online networks, reaching women and girls across the U.S., often sending the drugs via USPS. RISKS. ALL emphasizes that these pills frequently come from unregulated sources, heightening the risks of additional harmful substances being prese...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Revolution Under the Cloak of Normalcy

  Like braids of a rope, scientific and technical knowledge, policy and law intertwine to produce rules and permissions, inserting tech into daily life These processes lie on a continuum between the democratic - where scientific knowledge arises through a social process and its values that underpin how decisions are made - and technocratic, a perspective favoured by commercial and industrial interests, where the'solution is to get more and better science into the decisions.' Risk Beyond Privacy New technological frontiers weld biometric and digital identity data into the mainframes of governments and large private institutions Partnerships with the private sector are ordinary, industry consultants provide expertise, apps and plugins enhance framework operability, while creating new opportunities to manage information The closed-door public-private arrangements carry with them the potential for systemic and sustained abuse of power New Zealand In New Zealand, new legislation, th...
Post a Comment
Read more