There is one aspect of "The sex question" that is well worth diving into: the perception driven home by the mainstream media, the pop culture, and the Democrat side of the aisle, that Kamala Harris, and all female Democrat candidates, are automatically better choices for female voters - "For women's issues." Now, no male candidate of either party ever campaigns as being better "For men's issues." It never happens.
Female Democrats campaign for office all the time, claiming that they are the clear choice "For women's issues." It is fair to ask the question: what are these "Women's issues" they speak of? Accuse them of just using the term as cover for the abortion issue, and they will tell you that No, they're not talking about abortion alone; they're talking about health insurance and women's rights and employment law too.
The voter needs to ask a question: aren't any other issues also women's issues? And if so, where do the candidates stand on them? For example: Our cities and suburbs are undergoing a severe explosion of crime, from robbery to rape to other physical attacks.
Women are right to be concerned about it, and are right to demand answers from candidates seeking their support.
No matter how many tragic occurrences prove the case - from Laken Riley to Melody Waldecker, from Kate Steinle to Catalina Andrade and Merced Ballon - the press will never admit it's a women's issue.
Women buy gasoline for their cars; women need power in their wall outlets for air conditioning, light, and appliances.
The press plays along with the Democrat party talking points, using the term "Women's issues" as a handy euphemism for "Abortion on demand." Because the press is just as wrong on all those other actual women's issues as they are about that one.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/08/women_s_issues_and_the_2024_election.html
No comments:
Post a Comment