Many of you may remember that it was also Crowdstrike that was working with the Democrat Party when they blamed the leak of Hillary Clinton's emails on a suspicious Russian hack.
On March 8, 2020 and before on June 16, 2019, we presented arguments against the Mueller gang's assertion that the DNC was hacked by Russians.
Cyber expert Yaacov Apelbaum posted an incredible report with information basically proving that the DNC was not hacked by the Russians.
Next Apelbaum questioned the Mueller gang's assertion that the 'hacker' named Guccifer 2.0 was a Russian - Any evidence that Guccifer 2.0 is Russian should be evaluated while keeping these points in mind: He used a Russian VPN service to cloak his IP address, but did not use TOR. Using a proxy to conduct cyber operations is a SOP in all intelligence and LEA agencies.
Why waste the time and effort doing this? About 4 hours after creating the 'Russian' version of the document, he exported it to a PDF using LibreOffice 4.2.
His poor Romanian language skills were later used to unmask his Russian identify.
After providing a couple more examples of why the Russian story doesn't stick, Apelbaum closes with this - The bottom line is that if we want to go beyond the speculative trivia, the pseudo science, and the bombastic unverified claims, we have to ask the real tough questions, mainly: is Guccifer 2.0 even the real attacker and how did he circumvent all of the logs during several weeks of repeated visits while downloading close to 2 GB of data? Esteemed NSA whistleblower Bill Binney reported in June 2019 that there was no way Russians hacked the DNC based on the speed of the transfer of the data that was hacked.
No comments:
Post a Comment